Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 22:22 UTC

yarpc / yarpc-go

A message passing platform for Go

GoMIT★ 440 stars⑂ 126 forkssince Jan 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

yarpc/yarpc-go holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

yarpcOrganization
18 followers4 public repossince Jan 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogo.uber.org/yarpcv1.89.6-18313 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
16.1/18Commit volume — 61 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year61
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.89.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases9.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.9/60Stars — 440 stars
17.5/25Forks — 126 forks
7.6/15Watchers — 24 watchers
Inputs used
forks126
stars440
watchers24
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgoreportcard.com
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 89 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled89
top_contributor_share0.242
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
24.4/30PR acceptance — 1,729/2,129 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,729
open_issues11
closed_issues358
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d12
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.97
closed_unmerged_prs400
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.2/25Owner reach — 18 followers of yarpc
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginyarpc
public_repos4
account_age_days3,898

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history — 183 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgo.uber.org/yarpc
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgo, message-passing, rpc, grpc, protobuf, thrift, yarpc, microservices
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: google.golang.org/grpc 1.27.1 (critical 9.1), google.golang.org/grpc v1.67.3 (critical 9.1), github.com/gogo/protobuf 1.3.1 (high 8.6), +3 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
19.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,973 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories70
affected_packages11
assessed_packages80
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 5, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 80 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 88 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.88
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, internal/examples/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, internal/examples/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, internal/crossdock/go.mod, internal/examples/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 13/900 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes624,530
source_files_sampled900
oversized_source_files13
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — encoding/protobuf/internal/testpb/test.proto, encoding/protobuf/internal/testpb/v2/test.proto, encoding/protobuf/protoc-gen-yarpc-go/internal/tests/annotations/annotations.proto, encoding/protobuf/protoc-gen-yarpc-go/internal/tests/withuuid/withuuid.proto, internal/crossdock/crossdockpb/crossdock.proto, internal/examples/protobuf/examplepb/example.proto, internal/examples/streaming/stream.proto, internal/prototest/examplepb/example.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_extension.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message_extension.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message_nest.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_service.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_service_method.proto, x/reflection/testdata/main.proto, x/reflection/testdata/other.proto, x/reflection/testdata/otherroot/main.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesencoding/protobuf/internal/testpb/test.proto, encoding/protobuf/internal/testpb/v2/test.proto, encoding/protobuf/protoc-gen-yarpc-go/internal/tests/annotations/annotations.proto, encoding/protobuf/protoc-gen-yarpc-go/internal/tests/withuuid/withuuid.proto, internal/crossdock/crossdockpb/crossdock.proto, internal/examples/protobuf/examplepb/example.proto, internal/examples/streaming/stream.proto, internal/prototest/examplepb/example.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_extension.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message_extension.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_message_nest.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_service.proto, x/reflection/testdata/conflict_service_method.proto, x/reflection/testdata/main.proto, x/reflection/testdata/other.proto, x/reflection/testdata/otherroot/main.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

440GitHub stars
89contributors
61commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
11open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 126 ⇿
0Stars
126Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515012632016-122021-092026-07
Major 0Minor 49Patch 42

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 22:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/dgryski/go-farmv0.0.0-20200201041132-a6ae2369ad13go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/googleapisv1.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/statusv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.7.0-rc.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv0.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/kisielk/errcheckv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-shellwordsv1.0.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-gov1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/uber-go/mapdecodev1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/uber-go/tallyv3.5.8+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-client-gov2.30.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/uber/ringpop-gov0.8.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/uber/tchannel-gov1.34.4go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.22.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/net/metricsv1.4.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/thriftrwv1.32.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/toolsv0.0.0-20190618225709-2cfd321de3eego.mod
Gogo.uber.org/yarpc/internal/examplesv0.0.0-20230831212929-ccef8c01afa8go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/lintv0.0.0-20210508222113-6edffad5e616go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.45.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.67.3go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.34.2go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.4.3go.mod
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 47 direct and 33 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/dgryski/go-farmv0.0.0-20200201041132-a6ae2369ad13direct
Gogithub.com/gogo/googleapisv1.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2direct
Gogithub.com/gogo/statusv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/golang/mock1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.7.0-rc.1direct
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4direct
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv0.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/kisielk/errcheckv1.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.4direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-shellwordsv1.0.12direct
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-go1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-gov1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/uber-go/mapdecodev1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/uber-go/tallyv3.5.8+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-client-go2.22.1+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-client-gov2.30.0+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/uber/ringpop-gov0.8.5direct
Gogithub.com/uber/tchannel-go1.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/uber/tchannel-gov1.34.4direct
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/fx1.10.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.22.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.4.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/net/metricsv1.4.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/thriftrw1.22.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/thriftrwv1.32.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/toolsv0.0.0-20190618225709-2cfd321de3eedirect
Gogo.uber.org/yarpc/internal/examplesv0.0.0-20230831212929-ccef8c01afa8direct
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.13.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/lintv0.0.0-20210508222113-6edffad5e616direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20200202094626-16171245cfb2direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.45.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20240814211410-ddb44dafa142direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.27.1direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.67.3direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.34.2direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.4.3direct
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.6.1direct
Gogithub.com/anmitsu/go-shlexv0.0.0-20200514113438-38f4b401e2beindirect
Gogithub.com/apache/thrift0.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perksv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cindirect
Gogithub.com/cactus/go-statsd-client/statsdv0.0.0-20191106001114-12b4e2b38748indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/crossdock/crossdock-gov0.0.0-20160816171116-049aabb0122bindirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/structtagv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flagsv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/konsorten/go-windows-terminal-sequencesv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensionsv1.0.2-0.20181231171920-c182affec369indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/samuel/go-thriftv0.0.0-20191111193933-5165175b40afindirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/twmb/murmur3v1.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/uber-common/barkv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/uber/jaeger-libv2.4.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogo.uber.org/digv1.17.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/yarpc1.42.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20221208152030-732eee02a75aindirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20231108232855-2478ac86f678indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools/go/expectv0.1.1-deprecatedindirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 80 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpc1.27.1directcritical91.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
google.golang.org/grpcv1.67.3directcritical71.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.1directhigh21.3.2
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20200202094626-16171245cfb2directhigh3412.0.2
github.com/apache/thrift0.13.0indirecthigh20.24.0
github.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.4.1indirecthigh21.11.1
github.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.4.2indirecthigh21.9.3
golang.org/x/netv0.54.0directmoderate81.27.0-rc.3
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.4directunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/modv0.36.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.