Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-31 10:14 UTC

yjl9903 / Breadc

🥪 Yet another Command Line Application Framework desgined for TypeScript.

TypeScriptMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

yjl9903/Breadc holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (58/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

XLorPersonal account
296 followers142 public repossince Jul 2017Afterglow

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@breadc/tui1.0.0-beta.188151733 days agobreadcclicommand-line
npm@breadc/core1.0.0-beta.187851733 days agobreadccliframeworkcommand-linetypescript
npm@breadc/color1.0.0-beta.181,1503533 days agobreadcprogressclicommand-line
npm@breadc/death1.0.0-beta.1829,9062233 days agobreadcdeathterminalsignalclicommand-line
npmbreadcpack1.0.0-beta.181081833 days agobreadccliframeworkcommand-linetypescript
npmbreadc1.0.0-beta.189725633 days agobreadccliframeworkcommand-linetypescript
npm@breadc/complete1.0.0-beta.181843533 days agobreadcautocompletioncompleteclicommand-line
npmcreate-breadc1.0.0-beta.181701833 days agobreadccliframeworkcommand-linetypescript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume301 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year301
human_commit_share0.16
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases57 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 33 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tagv1.0.0-beta.18
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases18
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars11 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars11
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
60.4/80Monthly downloads34,090 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@breadc/tui, @breadc/core, @breadc/color, @breadc/death, breadcpack, breadc, @breadc/complete, create-breadc
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads34,090
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.991
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution80% of issues closed
29.6/30PR acceptance1,301/1,317 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,301
open_issues1
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.8/25Owner reach296 followers of yjl9903
25/25Track record142 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers296
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginyjl9903
public_repos142
account_age_days3,338
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history56 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@breadc/tui, @breadc/core, @breadc/color, @breadc/death, breadcpack, breadc, @breadc/complete, create-breadc
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, command-line, framework, typescript, vscode, breadc
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:breadc@1.0.0-beta.18 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,730
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapmise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingapps/breadcpack/tsconfig.json, apps/create-breadc/tsconfig.json, packages/breadc/tsconfig.json, packages/color/tsconfig.json, packages/complete/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/death/tsconfig.json, packages/tui/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance83 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsapps/breadcpack/tsconfig.json, apps/create-breadc/tsconfig.json, packages/breadc/tsconfig.json, packages/color/tsconfig.json, packages/complete/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/death/tsconfig.json, packages/tui/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.83
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/86 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes30,536
source_files_sampled86
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars
3contributors
301commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
57releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-31 10:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@breadc/colorworkspace:*apps/breadcpack/package.json
npm@breadc/coreworkspace:*apps/breadcpack/package.json
npmbreadcworkspace:*apps/breadcpack/package.json
npm@breadc/colorworkspace:*apps/create-breadc/package.json
npm@breadc/coreworkspace:*apps/create-breadc/package.json
npmbreadcworkspace:*apps/create-breadc/package.json
npm@breadc/colorworkspace:*packages/breadc/package.json
npm@breadc/coreworkspace:*packages/breadc/package.json
npm@breadc/deathworkspace:*packages/breadc/package.json
npm@breadc/tuiworkspace:*packages/breadc/package.json
npmomelette^0.4.17packages/complete/package.json
npm@breadc/colorworkspace:*packages/core/package.json
npm@breadc/colorworkspace:*packages/tui/package.json
npm@breadc/deathworkspace:*packages/tui/package.json
npmfast-string-width^3.0.2packages/tui/package.json
npmstd-env^4.2.0packages/tui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:breadc@1.0.0-beta.18 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.