Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 00:46 UTC

zaidoon1 / rust-rocksdb

rust wrapper for rocksdb

RustApache-2.0★ 45 stars⑂ 28 forkssince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗

zaidoon1/rust-rocksdb holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (67/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Zaidoon Abd Al HadiPersonal account
15 followers23 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iorust-rocksdb0.53.0294,8384712 days agodatabaseembeddedlsm-treepersistence
crates.iorust-librocksdb-sys0.48.1+11.8.1294,9584212 days agobindingsffirocksdbdatabaseexternal-ffi-bindingsapi-bindings

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 131 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year131
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 47 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~26.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv0.53.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release12
mean_days_between_releases26.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.7/60Stars — 45 stars
11.9/25Forks — 28 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks28
stars45
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
76.9/80Monthly downloads — 589,796 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrust-rocksdb, rust-librocksdb-sys
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads2,385,191
monthly_downloads589,796
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 27% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 57 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.271
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 251/267 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs251
open_issues3
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of zaidoon1
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginzaidoon1
public_repos23
account_age_days2,932
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20Version history — 47 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrust-rocksdb, rust-librocksdb-sys
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/rust-rocksdb
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/rust-rocksdb
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

86Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

82Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 57 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate8.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages114
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 114 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.885
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — librocksdb-sys/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_fileslibrocksdb-sys/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes — 4/113 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes457,749
source_files_sampled113
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

45GitHub stars
99contributors
131commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
47releases
3bus factor
3open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 28 ⇿
0Stars
28Forks
33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242322024-052025-072026-08
Major 0Minor 27Patch 6

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.2 / 10
8.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 00:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 57 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-librocksdb-sys0.48.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iotikv-jemalloc-sys0.7librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iolz4-sys1.11librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd-sys2.0librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibz-sys1.1librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iobzip2-sys0.1librocksdb-sys/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 127

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 113 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobzip2-sys—direct
crates.iobzip2-sys0.1.13+1.0.8direct
crates.iolibc—direct
crates.iolibc0.2.189direct
crates.iolibz-sys—direct
crates.iolibz-sys1.1.29direct
crates.iolz4-sys—direct
crates.iolz4-sys1.11.1+lz4-1.10.0direct
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5direct
crates.ioserde1.0.229direct
crates.iotikv-jemalloc-sys—direct
crates.iotikv-jemalloc-sys0.7.1+5.3.1-0-g81034ce1f1373e37dc865038e1bc8eeecf559ce8direct
crates.iozstd-sys—direct
crates.iozstd-sys2.1.0+zstd.1.5.7direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobindgen—indirect
crates.iobindgen0.73.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc—indirect
crates.iocc1.4.5indirect
crates.iocexpr0.6.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclang-sys1.8.1indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.2indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.ioconst-str—indirect
crates.ioconst-str1.1.0indirect
crates.iocriterion0.8.2indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iodiff0.1.13indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.12indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioglob—indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.4indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.34indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iolibloading0.8.9indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.ionom7.1.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopkg-config—indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.34indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.iopretty_assertions1.4.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.2indirect
crates.iorustflags—indirect
crates.iorustflags0.1.7indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iouuid—indirect
crates.iouuid1.26.0indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.ioyansi1.0.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.55indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.55indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 114 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.