Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 21:14 UTC

zdavatz / oddb2xml

oddb2xml, create xml files using refdata, swissmedic and bag xml files

Ruby · HTMLGPL-3.0★ 9 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Aug 2012View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

zdavatz/oddb2xml holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Zeno R.R. DavatzPersonal account
143 followers136 public repossince Apr 2008ywesee GmbH

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsoddb2xml3.0.35-2323 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume110 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year110
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases11 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~13.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv3.0.35
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases13.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars9
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.3/80Total downloads512,702 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesoddb2xml
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads512,702
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.587
How it's scored
38.5/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance30/32 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs30
open_issues8
closed_issues87
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.916
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.5/25Owner reach143 followers of zdavatz
25/25Track record136 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers143
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginzdavatz
public_repos136
account_age_days6,728
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history232 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesoddb2xml
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://www.ywesee.com/Oddb2xml/Index
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrefdata, bag, swissmedic, xml, open, source, ruby, switzerland, drug, data
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://www.ywesee.com/Oddb2xml/Index
docs_sitehttp://www.ywesee.com/Oddb2xml/Index
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages78
unassessed_packages26
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 78 resolved dependencies against OSV. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history78 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.78
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes38,964
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice99 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.99
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
52.6/55Manageable file sizes2/45 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes88,170
source_files_sampled45
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

9GitHub stars
4contributors
110commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
8open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512013-122019-032024-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 21:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemspry-byebugGemfile
RubyGemspry-docGemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri>= 1.18.10Gemfile
RubyGemsrack>= 3.1.20Gemfile
RubyGemsmutex_mGemfile
All dependencies 104

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0direct
RubyGemsnokogiridirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4direct
RubyGemspry-byebug3.12.0direct
RubyGemspry-doc1.7.0direct
RubyGemsrackdirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6direct
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.0.1indirect
RubyGemsbundlerindirect
RubyGemsbyebug13.0.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscsvindirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.5indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdomain_name0.6.20240107indirect
RubyGemsflexmockindirect
RubyGemsflexmock3.0.2indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshtmlentitiesindirect
RubyGemshtmlentities4.4.2indirect
RubyGemshttp-cookie1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmechanizeindirect
RubyGemsmechanize2.14.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0203indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitarindirect
RubyGemsminitar1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-http-digest_auth1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http-persistent4.0.8indirect
RubyGemsnkf0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsoptimistindirect
RubyGemsoptimist3.2.1indirect
RubyGemsoxindirect
RubyGemsox2.14.23indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.10.2indirect
RubyGemsparsletindirect
RubyGemsparslet2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspry0.16.0indirect
RubyGemspsychindirect
RubyGemspsych3.3.4indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrakeindirect
RubyGemsrake13.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrdocindirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.3.4.1indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrexmlindirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspecindirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.84.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.49.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-ole1.2.13.1indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyntlm0.6.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyXLindirect
RubyGemsrubyXL3.4.33indirect
RubyGemsrubyzipindirect
RubyGemsrubyzip3.0.2indirect
RubyGemssax-machineindirect
RubyGemssax-machine1.3.2indirect
RubyGemsspreadsheetindirect
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.3.4indirect
RubyGemsstandard1.54.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandardrbindirect
RubyGemsstandardrb1.0.1indirect
RubyGemstimecopindirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.10indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsvcrindirect
RubyGemsvcr6.4.0indirect
RubyGemswebmockindirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.1indirect
RubyGemswebrickindirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemswebrobots0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsxml-simpleindirect
RubyGemsxml-simple1.1.9indirect
RubyGemsyard0.9.44indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 78 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.