Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 15:15 UTC

zeitlos / lucity

Lucity is an open-source Vercel/Railway/Heroku alternative deliberately designed to avoid lock-in. Push to deploy, one-click PostgreSQL, Redis and S3 object storage.

Go · Vue · TypeScriptAGPL-3.0★ 39 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#deployment#helm#kubernetes#cloud#self-hosted

zeitlos/lucity holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Security (36/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

zeitlosOrganization
6 followers15 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/zeitlos/lucityv26.7.2+incompatible-1554 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 869 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year869
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 47 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv26.7.3-rc.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk
How it's scored
25.6/60Stars — 39 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars39
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good
How it's scored
31.1/42Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 39/39 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues13
closed_issues37
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.74
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of zeitlos
19.5/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginzeitlos
public_repos15
account_age_days1,958

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/zeitlos/lucity
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://lucity.cloud
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdeployment, helm, kubernetes, cloud, self-hosted
has_wikino
homepagehttps://lucity.cloud
docs_sitehttps://lucity.cloud
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 67 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.6

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

70Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, services/dashboard/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://lucity.cloud/llms.txt)
9.6/40Legible commit history — 18 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://lucity.cloud/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.18
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, services/dashboard/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,922

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — services/dashboard/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsservices/dashboard/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscharts/go.mod, cli/go.mod, pkg/go.mod, services/builder/go.mod, services/cashier/go.mod, services/conductor/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes — 5/323 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,131,941
source_files_sampled323
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — pkg/cashier/cashier.proto, pkg/conductor/conductor.proto, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/apitoken.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/auth.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/backup.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/billing.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/database.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/eject.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/environment.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/github.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/keyvaluestore.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/logs.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/metrics.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/objectstorage.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/project.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/registry.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/release.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/scan.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/schema.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/service.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/variable.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/volume.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/vulnerability.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/workspace.graphqls
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filespkg/cashier/cashier.proto, pkg/conductor/conductor.proto, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/apitoken.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/auth.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/backup.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/billing.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/database.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/eject.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/environment.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/github.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/keyvaluestore.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/logs.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/metrics.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/objectstorage.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/project.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/registry.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/release.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/scan.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/schema.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/service.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/variable.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/volume.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/vulnerability.graphqls, services/conductor/internal/api/graphql/schema/workspace.graphqls
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

39GitHub stars
1contributors
869commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
13open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456622026-032026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 15:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities67 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.15cli/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.6.1cli/go.mod
Gogithub.com/zeitlos/lucity/pkgv0.0.0-20260706084318-3ef7184f18d8cli/go.mod
Gogithub.com/bradleyfalzon/ghinstallation/v2v2.19.0pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.19.0pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v68v68.0.0pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/lmittmann/tintv1.1.3pkg/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0pkg/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0pkg/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afpkg/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with zeitlos/lucity. Read them side by side →

96cozystack/cozystackCozystack: Free Cloud Platform based on KubernetesExceptional99argoproj/argo-cdDeclarative Continuous Deployment for KubernetesExceptional99cloudposse/atmosAtmos is the open-source runtime for infrastructure — it builds, authenticates, and ships Terraform, OpenTofu, Packer, Ansible, Kubernetes, Helm, and containers the same way on your laptop, in CI, and with AI agents.Exceptional98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional97kptdev/kptAutomate Kubernetes Configuration EditingExceptional97mckinsey/agents-at-scale-arkProvider-agnostic operations for agentic resources. ARK codifies patterns and practices developed across dozens of agentic application projects.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.