Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 15:09 UTC

zhangsen540445123 / claw-manager

TypeScript · JavaNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

zhangsen540445123/claw-manager holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 7 days ago.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

zhangsen540445123Personal account
0 followers68 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@claw-manager/document-parser2026.8.2294230 days ago
npm@claw-manager/miniapp-bridge-plugin2026.7.20100957 days ago
npm@claw-manager/workspace-file-plugin2026.8.2248430 days ago
npm@claw-manager/openclaw-weixin2026.8.45961113 days ago
npm@claw-manager/openviking-openclaw-plugin2026.6.415501511 days agoopenclawopenvikingplugincontext-enginememoryremote-memoryragsemantic-retrievalcontext-databaselong-term-memoryauto-recallauto-capture
npm@claw-manager/openclaw-api-channel2026.6.586153213 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
17.8/18Commit volume96 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year96
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
43.3/80Monthly downloads1,761 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@claw-manager/openclaw-weixin, @claw-manager/openviking-openclaw-plugin, @claw-manager/openclaw-api-channel
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,761
unverified_packages_excluded@claw-manager/document-parser, @claw-manager/miniapp-bridge-plugin, @claw-manager/workspace-file-plugin
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach0 followers of zhangsen540445123
25/25Track record68 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginzhangsen540445123
public_repos68
account_age_days2,654
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable6 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history32 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@claw-manager/document-parser, @claw-manager/miniapp-bridge-plugin, @claw-manager/workspace-file-plugin, @claw-manager/openclaw-weixin, @claw-manager/openviking-openclaw-plugin, @claw-manager/openclaw-api-channel
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities108 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
11.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: pdfjs-dist 5.7.284 (high), xlsx 0.18.5 (high 7.8)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.5/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,238 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages48
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the npm:@claw-manager/document-parser@2026.8.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 48 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.2/40Legible commit history67 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.698
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,967
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapbackend/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingfrontend/tsconfig.json, packages/document-parser/tsconfig.json, plugins/miniapp-bridge-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openclaw-api-channel-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openclaw-weixin-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openviking-openclaw-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-file-plugin/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 96
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json, packages/document-parser/tsconfig.json, plugins/miniapp-bridge-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openclaw-api-channel-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openclaw-weixin-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/openviking-openclaw-plugin/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-file-plugin/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbackend/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes4/557 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes105,528
source_files_sampled557
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

0GitHub stars
-contributors
96commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
0releases
-bus factor
0open issues
Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Contributor list unavailable
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.clawbotforall:claw-manager-api' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 15:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities108 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 36
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-actuatorbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-redisbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-securitybackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-validationbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-websocketbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.mybatis.spring.boot:mybatis-spring-boot-starter${mybatis-spring-boot.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavencom.mysql:mysql-connector-jbackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.flywaydb:flyway-corebackend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.flywaydb:flyway-mysqlbackend/pom.xml
Mavencom.github.docker-java:docker-java${docker-java.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavencom.github.docker-java:docker-java-core${docker-java.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavencom.github.docker-java:docker-java-transport-httpclient5${docker-java.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.springdoc:springdoc-openapi-starter-webmvc-ui${springdoc.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on${bouncycastle.version}backend/pom.xml
Mavenorg.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit${jgit.version}backend/pom.xml
npm@stomp/stompjs^7.1.1frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/vue-query^5.80.7frontend/package.json
npmelement-plus^2.9.11frontend/package.json
npmlucide-vue-next^0.468.0frontend/package.json
npmpinia^2.3.0frontend/package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4frontend/package.json
npmvue^3.5.13frontend/package.json
npmvue-router^4.5.0frontend/package.json
npmjszip^3.10.1packages/document-parser/package.json
npmmammoth^1.10.0packages/document-parser/package.json
npmpdfjs-dist^5.4.54packages/document-parser/package.json
npmxlsx^0.18.5packages/document-parser/package.json
npm@sinclair/typebox^0.34.33plugins/miniapp-bridge-plugin/package.json
npm@claw-manager/document-parser2026.8.2plugins/openclaw-weixin-plugin/package.json
npmqrcode-terminal0.12.0plugins/openclaw-weixin-plugin/package.json
npmzod^4.3.6plugins/openclaw-weixin-plugin/package.json
npm@sinclair/typebox0.34.48plugins/openviking-openclaw-plugin/package.json
npmfflate^0.8.2plugins/openviking-openclaw-plugin/package.json
npm@sinclair/typebox^0.34.33plugins/workspace-file-plugin/package.json
npm@claw-manager/document-parser2026.8.2plugins/workspace-file-plugin/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing npm:@claw-manager/document-parser@2026.8.2 pulls in 48 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pdfjs-dist5.7.284directhigh16.2.108
xlsx0.18.5directhigh2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.