Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 02:38 UTC

zhlhaohao / doclens

doc index\search\exploer\aiask utility

Python · TypeScript · JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolTerminal interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

zhlhaohao/doclens holds a health index of 44 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Security (22/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

44
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

44
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

loongPersonal account
1 follower87 public repossince Jul 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdoclens1.1.302,511270 days agodoclensragretrievaltree-searchbm25fts5document-indexing
crates.iotreesearchpoints to another repo — not scored1.0.895131 days agosearchtreeclibm25fts5command-line-utilitiestext-processing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 577 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year577
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
45.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,511 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdoclens
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,511
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.799

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

47Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of zhlhaohao
25/25Track record — 87 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginzhlhaohao
public_repos87
account_age_days2,605
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdoclens
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

22At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

22At Risk
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 39 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate2.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/undici/docs/docs/api/Agent.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.94
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/undici/docs/docs/api/Agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,973

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/debounce/Makefile, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/delegates/Makefile, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/only/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/@shoelace-style/localize/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bound/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/fastq/test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-regex/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/reusify/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/safe-regex-test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-list/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-map/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-weakmap/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/tsconfig.json, treesearch/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 21 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdoclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/debounce/Makefile, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/delegates/Makefile, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/only/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdoclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/@shoelace-style/localize/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bound/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/fastq/test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-regex/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/reusify/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/safe-regex-test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-list/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-map/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-weakmap/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/tsconfig.json, treesearch/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.21
toolchain_manifestsrust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/@shoelace-style/localize/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/call-bound/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/fastq/test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-generator-function/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/is-regex/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/reusify/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/safe-regex-test/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-list/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-map/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel-weakmap/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/node_modules/side-channel/tsconfig.json, doclens/web_v2/frontend/tsconfig.json, treesearch/py.typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 3/292 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes343,963
source_files_sampled292
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
577commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • crates package 'treesearch' points at a different repository (https://github.com/shibing624/TreeSearch); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:doclens@1.1.30; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 02:37 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities39 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 54
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiosmtplib>=3.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.25.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIborax>=4.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=42.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdateparser>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml>=0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.1pyproject.toml
PyPIjieba>=0.42pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImarkitdown>=0.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxl>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpasslib>=1.7.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpathspec>=0.11pyproject.toml
PyPIpdf2image>=1.16.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpdfplumber>=0.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow>=10.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT>=2.8.0,<2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdf>=4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-docx>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-jose>=3.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-pptx>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItextual>=0.47.0pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm>=4.42pyproject.toml
PyPItrafilatura>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchdog>=3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIXlsxWriter>=3.2.0pyproject.toml
crates.ioclap4rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.31rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.10rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iojieba-rs0.7rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iotermcolor1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.17rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioscraper0.21rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioego-tree0.9rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iopulldown-cmark0.12rust/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaho-corasick1rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-50.10rust/Cargo.toml
crates.iofs20.4rust/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with zhlhaohao/doclens. Read them side by side →

71xhluca/bm25sFast BM25 search in Python, powered by Numpy and NumbaGood75nstranquist/docs-pullerLocal docs search: copy pages to Markdown, index with SQLite FTS5, and measure retrieval quality.Good78major7apps/pensyveUniversal memory runtime for AI agentsGood100run-llama/llama_indexLlamaIndex is the leading document agent and OCR platformExceptional94infiniflow/infinityThe AI-native database built for LLM applications, providing incredibly fast hybrid search of dense vector, sparse vector, tensor (multi-vector), and full-text.Exceptional91MinishLab/sembleFast and Accurate Code Search for Agents. Uses 99% fewer tokens than grep+readExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.