Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 01:34 UTC

0dayInc / pwn

PWN is an open security automation framework that aims to stand on the shoulders of security giants, promoting trust and innovation.

RubyMIT★ 86 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Feb 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

0dayInc/pwn holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

0day Inc.Organization
21 followers25 public repossince Jan 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemspwn0.5.780-1,3120 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 508 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year508
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year38
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 57 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~121.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tag0.5.700
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release57
mean_days_between_releases121.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.3/60Stars — 86 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars86
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63.2/80Total downloads — 1,203,324 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespwn
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads1,203,324
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.98
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.9/30PR acceptance — 1,072/1,074 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,072
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d26
prs_decided_30d26
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.7/25Owner reach — 21 followers of 0dayInc
22.3/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_login0dayInc
public_repos25
account_age_days2,832

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,312 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespwn
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreverse-engineering, penetration-testing, fuzzing, reconnaissance, web-security, bugbounty, security-tools, penetration-testing-framework, sast, security-research, vulnerability-scanning, artificial-intelligence, sdr, telecom, hardware-security, telecom-security, ai-agents, ai-harness, ai-self-learning
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
docs_sitehttps://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.5/40Legible commit history — 46 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.46
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.1/55Manageable file sizes — 19/1,106 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes187,953
source_files_sampled1,106
oversized_source_files19
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

86GitHub stars
2contributors
508commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121222022-022024-062026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 13

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 01:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 94
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactivesupport<8.1.4Gemfile
RubyGemsanemone0.7.2Gemfile
RubyGemsauthy3.0.1Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk3.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbarby0.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbase320.3.4Gemfile
RubyGemsbitcoin-ruby0.0.20Gemfile
RubyGemsbrakeman8.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbson5.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbundler>=4.0.23Gemfile
RubyGemsbundler-audit>=0.9.3Gemfile
RubyGemsbunny3.4.0Gemfile
RubyGemscolorize1.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemscredit_card_validations10.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemscurses1.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4Gemfile
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7Gemfile
RubyGemsexecutable-hooks1.7.1Gemfile
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0Gemfile
RubyGemsffi1.17.4Gemfile
RubyGemsgdb1.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgem-wrappers1.4.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgeocoder1.8.6Gemfile
RubyGemsgist6.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgruff0.32.0Gemfile
RubyGemshtmlentities4.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsipaddress0.8.3Gemfile
RubyGemsjenkins_api_client21.9.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjs-beautify0.1.8Gemfile
RubyGemsjson>=2.13.2Gemfile
RubyGemsjsonpath1.1.5Gemfile
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjwt3.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemslibusb0.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsluhn3.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmail2.9.1Gemfile
RubyGemsmcp1.8.1Gemfile
RubyGemsmeshtastic0.0.188Gemfile
RubyGemsmetasm1.0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsmongo2.26.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmsfrpc-client1.1.2Gemfile
RubyGemsnetaddr2.0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-ldap0.21.0Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-openvpn0.8.7Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.2Gemfile
RubyGemsnexpose7.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri-diff0.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsoily_png1.2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsopen30.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsos1.1.4Gemfile
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3Gemfile
RubyGemspacketfu2.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemspacketgen4.1.1Gemfile
RubyGemspdf-reader2.16.0Gemfile
RubyGemspg1.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemspry0.16.1Gemfile
RubyGemspry-doc1.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrake13.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrb-readline0.5.5Gemfile
RubyGemsrbvmomi23.11.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc7.0.4Gemfile
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrex2.0.13Gemfile
RubyGemsrmagick7.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrqrcode3.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrtesseract3.1.4Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop1.92.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-audio1.6.1Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-nmap1.0.3Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-saml1.18.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrvm1.11.3.9Gemfile
RubyGemssavon2.17.5Gemfile
RubyGemsselenium-devtools0.155.0Gemfile
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.51.0Gemfile
RubyGemsslack-ruby-client3.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemssocksify1.8.1Gemfile
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.3.5Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite32.10.1Gemfile
RubyGemsthin2.0.1Gemfile
RubyGemstty-prompt0.23.1Gemfile
RubyGemstty-spinner0.9.3Gemfile
RubyGemsuart1.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemswatir7.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemswaveform0.1.3Gemfile
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2Gemfile
RubyGemswhois6.0.3Gemfile
RubyGemswhois-parser2.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemswicked_pdf2.8.2Gemfile
RubyGemsyard0.9.45Gemfile
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 94 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactivesupport—direct
RubyGemsanemone0.7.2direct
RubyGemsauthy3.0.1direct
RubyGemsaws-sdk3.3.0direct
RubyGemsbarby0.7.0direct
RubyGemsbase320.3.4direct
RubyGemsbitcoin-ruby0.0.20direct
RubyGemsbrakeman8.1.0direct
RubyGemsbson5.2.0direct
RubyGemsbundler—direct
RubyGemsbundler-audit—direct
RubyGemsbunny3.4.0direct
RubyGemscolorize1.1.0direct
RubyGemscredit_card_validations10.0.0direct
RubyGemscurses1.7.0direct
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4direct
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7direct
RubyGemsexecutable-hooks1.7.1direct
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0direct
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0direct
RubyGemsffi1.17.4direct
RubyGemsgdb1.0.0direct
RubyGemsgem-wrappers1.4.0direct
RubyGemsgeocoder1.8.6direct
RubyGemsgist6.1.0direct
RubyGemsgruff0.32.0direct
RubyGemshtmlentities4.4.2direct
RubyGemsipaddress0.8.3direct
RubyGemsjenkins_api_client21.9.0direct
RubyGemsjs-beautify0.1.8direct
RubyGemsjson—direct
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0direct
RubyGemsjsonpath1.1.5direct
RubyGemsjwt3.3.0direct
RubyGemslibusb0.8.0direct
RubyGemsluhn3.0.0direct
RubyGemsmail2.9.1direct
RubyGemsmcp1.8.0direct
RubyGemsmeshtastic0.0.188direct
RubyGemsmetasm1.0.6direct
RubyGemsmongo2.26.0direct
RubyGemsmsfrpc-client1.1.2direct
RubyGemsnet-ldap0.21.0direct
RubyGemsnet-openvpn0.8.7direct
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.2direct
RubyGemsnetaddr2.0.6direct
RubyGemsnexpose7.3.0direct
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4direct
RubyGemsnokogiri-diff0.3.0direct
RubyGemsoily_png1.2.1direct
RubyGemsopen30.3.0direct
RubyGemsos1.1.4direct
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3direct
RubyGemspacketfu2.0.0direct
RubyGemspacketgen4.1.1direct
RubyGemspdf-reader2.16.0direct
RubyGemspg1.7.0direct
RubyGemspry0.16.1direct
RubyGemspry-doc1.7.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrb-readline0.5.5direct
RubyGemsrbvmomi23.11.0direct
RubyGemsrdoc7.0.4direct
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0direct
RubyGemsrex2.0.13direct
RubyGemsrmagick7.2.0direct
RubyGemsrqrcode3.2.0direct
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2direct
RubyGemsrtesseract3.1.4direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.92.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2direct
RubyGemsruby-audio1.6.1direct
RubyGemsruby-nmap1.0.3direct
RubyGemsruby-saml1.18.1direct
RubyGemsrvm1.11.3.9direct
RubyGemssavon2.17.5direct
RubyGemsselenium-devtools0.155.0direct
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.51.0direct
RubyGemsslack-ruby-client3.3.0direct
RubyGemssocksify1.8.1direct
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.3.5direct
RubyGemssqlite32.10.1direct
RubyGemsthin2.0.1direct
RubyGemstty-prompt0.23.1direct
RubyGemstty-spinner0.9.3direct
RubyGemsuart1.0.0direct
RubyGemswatir7.3.0direct
RubyGemswaveform0.1.3direct
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2direct
RubyGemswhois6.0.3direct
RubyGemswhois-parser2.0.0direct
RubyGemswicked_pdf2.8.2direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.45direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.