Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 20:38 UTC

0dayInc / pwn

PWN is an open security automation framework that aims to stand on the shoulders of security giants, promoting trust and innovation.

RubyMIT★ 78 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Feb 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

0dayInc/pwn holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

0day Inc.Organization
20 followers25 public repossince Jan 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemspwn0.5.722-1,2671 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume554 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year554
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases14 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 10 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~121.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tag0.5.700
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases121.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.6/60Stars78 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars78
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.6/80Total downloads1,065,263 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespwn
dependents
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads1,065,263
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.98
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
29.9/30PR acceptance1,027/1,029 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,027
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d12
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d47
prs_decided_30d47
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach20 followers of 0dayInc
22.3/25Track record25 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_login0dayInc
public_repos25
account_age_days2,786

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history1,267 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespwn
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreverse-engineering, penetration-testing, fuzzing, reconnaissance, web-security, bugbounty, security-tools, penetration-testing-framework, sast, security-research, vulnerability-scanning, artificial-intelligence, sdr, telecom, hardware-security, telecom-security, ai-agents, ai-harness, ai-self-learning
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
docs_sitehttps://github.com/0dayinc/pwn
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.2/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.9/40Legible commit history56 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.56
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
54.1/55Manageable file sizes14/900 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes187,953
source_files_sampled900
oversized_source_files14
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

78GitHub stars
2contributors
554commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810922022-022024-042026-06
Major 0Minor 1Patch 11

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 20:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5CI-Tests8 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 94
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactivesupport<8.1.3.1Gemfile
RubyGemsanemone0.7.2Gemfile
RubyGemsauthy3.0.1Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk3.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbarby0.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbase320.3.4Gemfile
RubyGemsbitcoin-ruby0.0.20Gemfile
RubyGemsbrakeman8.0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsbson5.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbundler>=4.0.20Gemfile
RubyGemsbundler-audit>=0.9.3Gemfile
RubyGemsbunny3.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemscolorize1.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemscredit_card_validations9.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemscurses1.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4Gemfile
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7Gemfile
RubyGemsexecutable-hooks1.7.1Gemfile
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0Gemfile
RubyGemsffi1.17.4Gemfile
RubyGemsgdb1.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgem-wrappers1.4.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgeocoder1.8.6Gemfile
RubyGemsgist6.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsgruff0.32.0Gemfile
RubyGemshtmlentities4.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsipaddress0.8.3Gemfile
RubyGemsjenkins_api_client21.9.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjs-beautify0.1.8Gemfile
RubyGemsjson>=2.13.2Gemfile
RubyGemsjsonpath1.1.5Gemfile
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemslibusb0.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsluhn3.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmail2.9.1Gemfile
RubyGemsmcp1.4.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmeshtastic0.0.175Gemfile
RubyGemsmetasm1.0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsmongo2.25.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmsfrpc-client1.1.2Gemfile
RubyGemsnetaddr2.0.6Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-ldap0.20.0Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-openvpn0.8.7Gemfile
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1Gemfile
RubyGemsnexpose7.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri-diff0.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsoily_png1.2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsopen30.2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsos1.1.4Gemfile
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3Gemfile
RubyGemspacketfu2.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemspacketgen4.1.1Gemfile
RubyGemspdf-reader2.16.0Gemfile
RubyGemspg1.6.3Gemfile
RubyGemspry0.16.0Gemfile
RubyGemspry-doc1.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrake13.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrb-readline0.5.5Gemfile
RubyGemsrbvmomi23.10.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc7.0.4Gemfile
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrex2.0.13Gemfile
RubyGemsrmagick7.1.3Gemfile
RubyGemsrqrcode3.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrtesseract3.1.4Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop1.90.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-audio1.6.1Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-nmap1.0.3Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-saml1.18.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrvm1.11.3.9Gemfile
RubyGemssavon2.17.4Gemfile
RubyGemsselenium-devtools0.152.0Gemfile
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.48.0Gemfile
RubyGemsslack-ruby-client3.2.0Gemfile
RubyGemssocksify1.8.1Gemfile
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.3.5Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite32.9.6Gemfile
RubyGemsthin2.0.1Gemfile
RubyGemstty-prompt0.23.1Gemfile
RubyGemstty-spinner0.9.3Gemfile
RubyGemsuart1.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemswatir7.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemswaveform0.1.3Gemfile
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2Gemfile
RubyGemswhois6.0.3Gemfile
RubyGemswhois-parser2.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemswicked_pdf2.8.2Gemfile
RubyGemsyard0.9.45Gemfile
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 94 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactivesupportdirect
RubyGemsanemone0.7.2direct
RubyGemsauthy3.0.1direct
RubyGemsaws-sdk3.3.0direct
RubyGemsbarby0.7.0direct
RubyGemsbase320.3.4direct
RubyGemsbitcoin-ruby0.0.20direct
RubyGemsbrakeman8.0.6direct
RubyGemsbson5.2.0direct
RubyGemsbundlerdirect
RubyGemsbundler-auditdirect
RubyGemsbunny3.3.0direct
RubyGemscolorize1.1.0direct
RubyGemscredit_card_validations9.0.0direct
RubyGemscurses1.7.0direct
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4direct
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7direct
RubyGemsexecutable-hooks1.7.1direct
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0direct
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0direct
RubyGemsffi1.17.4direct
RubyGemsgdb1.0.0direct
RubyGemsgem-wrappers1.4.0direct
RubyGemsgeocoder1.8.6direct
RubyGemsgist6.1.0direct
RubyGemsgruff0.32.0direct
RubyGemshtmlentities4.4.2direct
RubyGemsipaddress0.8.3direct
RubyGemsjenkins_api_client21.9.0direct
RubyGemsjs-beautify0.1.8direct
RubyGemsjsondirect
RubyGemsjson_schemer2.5.0direct
RubyGemsjsonpath1.1.5direct
RubyGemsjwt3.2.0direct
RubyGemslibusb0.8.0direct
RubyGemsluhn3.0.0direct
RubyGemsmail2.9.1direct
RubyGemsmcp1.4.0direct
RubyGemsmeshtastic0.0.175direct
RubyGemsmetasm1.0.6direct
RubyGemsmongo2.25.0direct
RubyGemsmsfrpc-client1.1.2direct
RubyGemsnet-ldap0.20.0direct
RubyGemsnet-openvpn0.8.7direct
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1direct
RubyGemsnetaddr2.0.6direct
RubyGemsnexpose7.3.0direct
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4direct
RubyGemsnokogiri-diff0.3.0direct
RubyGemsoily_png1.2.1direct
RubyGemsopen30.2.1direct
RubyGemsos1.1.4direct
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3direct
RubyGemspacketfu2.0.0direct
RubyGemspacketgen4.1.1direct
RubyGemspdf-reader2.16.0direct
RubyGemspg1.6.3direct
RubyGemspry0.16.0direct
RubyGemspry-doc1.7.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrb-readline0.5.5direct
RubyGemsrbvmomi23.10.0direct
RubyGemsrdoc7.0.4direct
RubyGemsrest-client2.1.0direct
RubyGemsrex2.0.13direct
RubyGemsrmagick7.1.3direct
RubyGemsrqrcode3.2.0direct
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2direct
RubyGemsrtesseract3.1.4direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.90.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2direct
RubyGemsruby-audio1.6.1direct
RubyGemsruby-nmap1.0.3direct
RubyGemsruby-saml1.18.1direct
RubyGemsrvm1.11.3.9direct
RubyGemssavon2.17.4direct
RubyGemsselenium-devtools0.152.0direct
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.48.0direct
RubyGemsslack-ruby-client3.2.0direct
RubyGemssocksify1.8.1direct
RubyGemsspreadsheet1.3.5direct
RubyGemssqlite32.9.6direct
RubyGemsthin2.0.1direct
RubyGemstty-prompt0.23.1direct
RubyGemstty-spinner0.9.3direct
RubyGemsuart1.0.0direct
RubyGemswatir7.3.0direct
RubyGemswaveform0.1.3direct
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2direct
RubyGemswhois6.0.3direct
RubyGemswhois-parser2.0.0direct
RubyGemswicked_pdf2.8.2direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.45direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.