Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 01:53 UTC

42wim / matterircd

Connect to your mattermost or slack using your IRC-client of choice.

GoMIT★ 308 stars⑂ 64 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

42wim/matterircd holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (83/100) and lowest on Security (53/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WimPersonal account
472 followers201 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/42wim/matterircdv0.33.0-6419 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 369 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year369
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 72 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~158.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count72
latest_release_tagv0.33.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases158.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.3/60Stars — 308 stars
15/25Forks — 64 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks64
stars308
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.495
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 532/574 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs532
open_issues3
closed_issues347
prs_merged_7d16
prs_decided_7d16
prs_merged_30d42
prs_decided_30d43
issue_closed_ratio0.991
closed_unmerged_prs42
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.2/25Owner reach — 472 followers of 42wim
25/25Track record — 201 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers472
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_login42wim
public_repos201
account_age_days5,251
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 19 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/42wim/matterircd
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml, biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsircd, mattermost, irc-server, tls-support, slack, irc
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages2
assessed_packages81
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.2/40Legible commit history — 61 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.622
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,759
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — vendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/Justfile, vendor/github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/francoispqt/gojay/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/Makefile, vendor/github.com/matterbridge/logrus-prefixed-formatter/Makefile, vendor/github.com/mattermost/ldap/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pelletier/go-toml/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero/justfile, vendor/github.com/slack-go/slack/Makefile, vendor/github.com/slack-go/slack/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/viper/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2/Makefile, vendor/go.etcd.io/bbolt/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/atomic/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/gopkg.in/ini.v1/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml, biome.json
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesvendor/github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2/Justfile, vendor/github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/francoispqt/gojay/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror/Makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/Makefile, vendor/github.com/matterbridge/logrus-prefixed-formatter/Makefile, vendor/github.com/mattermost/ldap/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pelletier/go-toml/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero/justfile, vendor/github.com/slack-go/slack/Makefile, vendor/github.com/slack-go/slack/mise.toml, vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/viper/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2/Makefile, vendor/go.etcd.io/bbolt/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/atomic/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/gopkg.in/ini.v1/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
50/55Manageable file sizes — 2/22 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes90,916
source_files_sampled22
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_broker.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_controller.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_stdio.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesvendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_broker.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_controller.proto, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin/internal/plugin/grpc_stdio.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

308GitHub stars
28contributors
369commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
72releases
2bus factor
3open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 64 ⇿
0Stars
64Forks
68Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756432015-122021-042026-08
Major 0Minor 23Patch 38

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 01:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccgo.mod
Gogithub.com/desertbit/timerv0.0.0-20180107155436-c41aec40b27fgo.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/gopsv0.3.27go.mod
Gogithub.com/grokify/html-strip-tags-gov0.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/kenshaw/emojiv0.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/matterbridge/logrus-prefixed-formatterv0.5.3-0.20200523233437-d971309a77bago.mod
Gogithub.com/matterbridge/matterclientv0.0.0-20261018113008-46fb60aad258go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/publicv0.1.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-mastodonv0.0.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/slack-go/slackv0.23.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/sorcix/ircv1.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.17.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.7go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 60 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0direct
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccdirect
Gogithub.com/desertbit/timerv0.0.0-20180107155436-c41aec40b27fdirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/gopsv0.3.27direct
Gogithub.com/grokify/html-strip-tags-gov0.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7direct
Gogithub.com/kenshaw/emojiv0.6.2direct
Gogithub.com/matterbridge/logrus-prefixed-formatterv0.5.3-0.20200523233437-d971309a77badirect
Gogithub.com/matterbridge/matterclientv0.0.0-20261018113008-46fb60aad258direct
Gogithub.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/publicv0.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-mastodonv0.0.6direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/slack-go/slackv0.23.1direct
Gogithub.com/sorcix/ircv1.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.17.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.7direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver/v4v4.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2v2.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dyatlov/go-opengraph/opengraphv0.0.0-20220524092352-606d7b1e5f8aindirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/francoispqt/gojayv1.2.13indirect
Gogithub.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-berv1.5.5indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoffv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.8.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattermost/go-i18nv1.11.1-0.20211013152124-5c415071e404indirect
Gogithub.com/mattermost/ldapv0.0.0-20231116144001-0f480c025956indirect
Gogithub.com/mattermost/logr/v2v2.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mgutz/ansiv0.0.0-20200706080929-d51e80ef957dindirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tailv1.4.11indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pborman/uuidv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-tomlv1.9.5indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/slog-shimv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgpv1.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/tomnomnom/linkheaderv0.0.0-20180905144013-02ca5825eb80indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/wiggin77/merrorv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/wiggin77/srslogv1.0.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.9.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230905200255-921286631fa9indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaaindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.2indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0
golang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirectunknown51.27.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.