Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 13:33 UTC

ALCops / Analyzers

C# · ALMIT★ 16 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗

ALCops/Analyzers holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ALCopsOrganization
17 followers9 public repossince Jul 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetALCops.Analyzers1.0.2-193 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume367 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year367
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~11.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases11.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars16 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars16
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.6/80Total downloads59,050 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesALCops.Analyzers
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads59,050
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.965
How it's scored
25.6/42Issue resolution61% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance287/292 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs287
open_issues52
closed_issues81
prs_merged_7d14
prs_decided_7d16
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d17
issue_closed_ratio0.609
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach17 followers of ALCops
9.4/25Track record9 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginALCops
public_repos9
account_age_days390

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history19 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesALCops.Analyzers
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsal-language, bcopensource, dynamics-365-bc, dynamics-365-business-central, roslyn, roslyn-analyzer, static-analysis
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/instructions/ac0006-run-page-implement-page-management.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0013-field-groups-required.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0014-tooltip-must-end-with-punctuation.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0026-allow-in-customizations-for-omitted-fields.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0031-table-data-access-requires-permissions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0032-table-data-access-unused-permissions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/analyzer-development.instructions.md, .github/instructions/analyzer-exception-harness.instructions.md, .github/instructions/codefix-development.instructions.md, .github/instructions/common-library.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0004-permission-declaration-order.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0005-use-parenthesis-for-method-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0006-permission-values-should-be-lowercase.instructions.md, .github/instructions/get-bc-devtools.instructions.md, .github/instructions/instruction-maintenance.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0083-built-in-date-time-method.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0086-page-style-string-literal.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0091-translatable-text-should-be-translated.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0092-naming-pattern.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0095-parameter-not-referenced.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0096-unnecessary-record-parameter.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0097-mixed-exit-and-named-return-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0098-event-subscriber-naming-pattern.instructions.md, .github/instructions/netstandard21-compatibility.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0029-use-sequential-guid.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0030-use-partial-records-on-read.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0031-partial-records-cause-jit-load.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0032-report-layout-property-length.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0033-duplicate-odata-entity-name.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0034-placeholder-argument-count-mismatch.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0035-use-set-auto-calc-fields-for-loops.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0036-page-variable-setrecord-temporary-record.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0037-use-validate-for-field-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0038-not-all-code-paths-return-value.instructions.md, .github/instructions/project-overview.instructions.md, .github/instructions/record-method-classification.instructions.md, .github/instructions/release-strategy.instructions.md, .github/instructions/sdk-analyzer-infrastructure.instructions.md, .github/instructions/settings-schema.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing.instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history95 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files.github/instructions/ac0006-run-page-implement-page-management.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0013-field-groups-required.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0014-tooltip-must-end-with-punctuation.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0026-allow-in-customizations-for-omitted-fields.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0031-table-data-access-requires-permissions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ac0032-table-data-access-unused-permissions.instructions.md, .github/instructions/analyzer-development.instructions.md, .github/instructions/analyzer-exception-harness.instructions.md, .github/instructions/codefix-development.instructions.md, .github/instructions/common-library.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0004-permission-declaration-order.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0005-use-parenthesis-for-method-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fc0006-permission-values-should-be-lowercase.instructions.md, .github/instructions/get-bc-devtools.instructions.md, .github/instructions/instruction-maintenance.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0083-built-in-date-time-method.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0086-page-style-string-literal.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0091-translatable-text-should-be-translated.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0092-naming-pattern.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0095-parameter-not-referenced.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0096-unnecessary-record-parameter.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0097-mixed-exit-and-named-return-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/lc0098-event-subscriber-naming-pattern.instructions.md, .github/instructions/netstandard21-compatibility.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0029-use-sequential-guid.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0030-use-partial-records-on-read.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0031-partial-records-cause-jit-load.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0032-report-layout-property-length.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0033-duplicate-odata-entity-name.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0034-placeholder-argument-count-mismatch.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0035-use-set-auto-calc-fields-for-loops.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0036-page-variable-setrecord-temporary-record.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0037-use-validate-for-field-assignment.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pc0038-not-all-code-paths-return-value.instructions.md, .github/instructions/project-overview.instructions.md, .github/instructions/record-method-classification.instructions.md, .github/instructions/release-strategy.instructions.md, .github/instructions/sdk-analyzer-infrastructure.instructions.md, .github/instructions/settings-schema.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing.instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes50,299
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/ALCops.Analyzers/ALCops.Analyzers.csproj, src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.ApplicationCop/ALCops.ApplicationCop.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice62 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.62
toolchain_manifestssrc/ALCops.Analyzers/ALCops.Analyzers.csproj, src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.ApplicationCop/ALCops.ApplicationCop.csproj, src/ALCops.Common.Test/ALCops.Common.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.Common/ALCops.Common.csproj, src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.DocumentationCop/ALCops.DocumentationCop.csproj, src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.FormattingCop/ALCops.FormattingCop.csproj, src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.LinterCop/ALCops.LinterCop.csproj, src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.PlatformCop/ALCops.PlatformCop.csproj, src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj, src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes2/332 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes133,657
source_files_sampled332
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

16GitHub stars
3contributors
367commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
52open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612026-022026-052026-08
Major 1Minor 4Patch 10
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 13:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 59
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test/ALCops.ApplicationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.ApplicationCop/ALCops.ApplicationCop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.Common.Test/ALCops.Common.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.Common.Test/ALCops.Common.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.Common.Test/ALCops.Common.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.Common.Test/ALCops.Common.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.Common/ALCops.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test/ALCops.DocumentationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.DocumentationCop/ALCops.DocumentationCop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test/ALCops.FormattingCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.FormattingCop/ALCops.FormattingCop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.LinterCop.Test/ALCops.LinterCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.LinterCop/ALCops.LinterCop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test/ALCops.PlatformCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.PlatformCop/ALCops.PlatformCop.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.14.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.10.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.1.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.1.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.2.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.4.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0src/ALCops.TestAutomationCop/ALCops.TestAutomationCop.csproj
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.