Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 12:39 UTC

kucherenko / jscpd

Copy/paste detector for source code. 220+ languages, Rust engine, SARIF/HTML/badge reporters, GitHub Action, MCP server for AI agents.

RustMIT★ 6,214 stars⑂ 264 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

kucherenko/jscpd holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andrey KucherenkoPersonal account

248 followers133 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	cpd	5.2.1	13,020	22	0 days ago	cpd copy-paste-detector duplicate jscpd code-duplication cli rust

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.2/36	Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 790 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	790
human_commit_share	0.95
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	32

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 19 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~7.6 days
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 8 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	19
latest_release_tag	v5.2.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	7.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

85Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

88Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 6,214 stars
20.2/25	Forks — 264 forks
8/15	Watchers — 28 watchers

Inputs used

forks	264
stars	6,214
watchers	28
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	17
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, opencollective.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

69Good

How it's scored

54.9/80	Monthly downloads — 13,020 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	cpd
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	13,020
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 63 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	63
top_contributor_share	0.886

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good

How it's scored

38.5/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
20.2/30	PR acceptance — 435/645 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	435
open_issues	34
closed_issues	369
prs_merged_7d	16
prs_decided_7d	16
prs_merged_30d	43
prs_decided_30d	44
issue_closed_ratio	0.916
closed_unmerged_prs	210
first_time_authors_30d	6
first_time_prs_merged_30d	6
first_time_prs_decided_30d	6

Ownership & stewardship

65Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.2/25	Owner reach — 248 followers of kucherenko
25/25	Track record — 133 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	248
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	kucherenko
public_repos	133
account_age_days	6,134

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 22 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	cpd
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://jscpd.dev
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	copy-paste, duplicates, cpd, code-quality, clones-detection, ai, coding-agents, skills, mcp, dry, copy-paste-detection, cli, code-duplication, developer-tools, github-action, linter, rust, sarif, static-analysis, typescript
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://jscpd.dev
docs_site	https://jscpd.dev
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

89Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

86Excellent

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no data
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
7.5/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 8 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	8.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CII-Best-Practices. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	208
unassessed_packages	30
affected_by_severity	unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 208 resolved dependencies against OSV. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://jscpd.dev/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 92 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://jscpd.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.968
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — examples/rust-cpd-finder/Cargo.toml, rust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd-core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	examples/rust-cpd-finder/Cargo.toml, rust/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd-core/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd-finder/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd-reporter/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd-tokenizer/Cargo.toml, rust/crates/cpd/Cargo.toml, rust/fuzz/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.05

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 3/202 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	103,399
source_files_sampled	202
oversized_source_files	3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — fixtures/graphql/file1.graphql, fixtures/graphql/file2.graphql, fixtures/protobuf/file1.proto, fixtures/protobuf/file2.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	fixtures/graphql/file1.graphql, fixtures/graphql/file2.graphql, fixtures/protobuf/file1.proto, fixtures/protobuf/file2.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6,214GitHub stars

63contributors

790commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

19releases

1bus factor

34open issues

crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'jscpd-repo' from its registry
deps.dev does not index npm:cpd@5.2.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 264 ⇿

0Stars

264Forks

17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 14

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.6 / 10

8.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 12:38 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
n/a	CII-Best-Practices	internal error: error during http.Do: Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/kucherenko/jscpd": Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/kucherenko/jscpd": dial tcp: lookup www.bestpractices.dev on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving
0	Code-Review	Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
10	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 8 signed artifacts.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	jscpd	`==5.2.1`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 238

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 237 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	jscpd	`5.2.1`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	allocator-api2	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	arbitrary	`1.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	askama	`—`	indirect
crates.io	askama	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	askama_derive	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	askama_macros	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	askama_parser	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	basic-toml	`0.1.10`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	bytecount	`0.6.9`	indirect
crates.io	castaway	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.63`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.65`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`—`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.45`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	compact_str	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	compact_str	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cow-utils	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	cpd-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cpd-finder	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cpd-reporter	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cpd-tokenizer	`—`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.20`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	csv	`—`	indirect
crates.io	csv	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	csv-core	`0.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	dragonbox_ecma	`0.1.12`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	env_filter	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	env_logger	`—`	indirect
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.11`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	globset	`—`	indirect
crates.io	globset	`0.4.20`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.65`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	ignore	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ignore	`0.4.33`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jiff	`0.2.28`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-static	`0.2.28`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.34`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.102`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libfuzzer-sys	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	log	`—`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.31`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.34`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`—`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	memmap2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	memmap2	`0.9.11`	indirect
crates.io	nonmax	`0.5.5`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	owo-colors	`4.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc-miette	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	oxc-miette-derive	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_allocator	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_allocator	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_allocator	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast_macros	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast_macros	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast_visit	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ast_visit	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_data_structures	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_data_structures	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_diagnostics	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_diagnostics	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ecmascript	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_ecmascript	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_estree	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_estree	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_index	`4.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_index	`5.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_parser	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_parser	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_parser	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_regular_expression	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_regular_expression	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_span	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_span	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_span	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_str	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_str	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_syntax	`—`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_syntax	`0.133.0`	indirect
crates.io	oxc_syntax	`0.147.0`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	phf	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	phf	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	phf_generator	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	phf_generator	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	phf_macros	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	phf_macros	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	phf_shared	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	phf_shared	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`—`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.42.0`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`—`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	seq-macro	`0.3.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	siphasher	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.2`	indirect
crates.io	smawk	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	smawk	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	static_assertions	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.118`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	textwrap	`0.16.2`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`—`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-id-start	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-linebreak	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.13.3`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.3+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.125`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.125`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.125`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.125`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`—`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`0.8.15`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`0.8.18`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/darwin-arm64	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/darwin-x64	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/linux-arm64-gnu	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/linux-arm64-musl	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/linux-x64-gnu	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/linux-x64-musl	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/win32-arm64-msvc	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	@fallow-cli/win32-x64-msvc	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	fallow	`2.96.0`	indirect
npm	jscpd-darwin-arm64	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-darwin-x64	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-linux-arm64-gnu	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-linux-arm64-musl	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-linux-x64-gnu	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-linux-x64-musl	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs-darwin-arm64	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs-darwin-x64	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs-linux-arm64-gnu	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs-linux-x64-gnu	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-rs-win	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	jscpd-windows-arm64-msvc	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	jscpd-windows-x64-msvc	`5.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 208 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records