Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 14:29 UTC

ALightbolt4G / nitron

Build real Android APKs from web apps in seconds — no Android Studio, no Gradle, no SDK

TypeScript · HTML · JavaMIT★ 23 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#android #cli #compiler #hybrid-app #lightweight #no-sdk #nodejs #pwa-to-apk #typescript #webview #zero-config #capacitor-alternative #cordova-alternative #electron-for-android

ALightbolt4G/nitron holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

3lurPersonal account

3 followers16 public repossince Sep 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	nitron	2.0.2	3,551	7	30 days ago	android apk html css javascript mobile webview npm build-tool

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 9 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
15.4/18	Commit volume — 51 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	51
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	9
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 8 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 30 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~15 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	8
latest_release_tag	v2.0.2
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	30
mean_days_between_releases	15

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk

How it's scored

21.8/60	Stars — 23 stars
4/25	Forks — 4 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	4
stars	23
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate

How it's scored

47.3/80	Monthly downloads — 3,551 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	nitron
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,551
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.98

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

28/42	Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
30/30	PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1
open_issues	1
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.667
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25	Owner reach — 3 followers of ALightbolt4G
18.9/25	Track record — 16 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	ALightbolt4G
public_repos	16
account_age_days	1,819

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 30 days ago
20/20	Version history — 7 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	nitron
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://alightbolt4g.github.io/nitron/browser/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 14 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	android, cli, compiler, hybrid-app, lightweight, no-sdk, nodejs, pwa-to-apk, typescript, webview, zero-config, capacitor-alternative, cordova-alternative, electron-for-android
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://alightbolt4g.github.io/nitron/browser/
docs_site	https://alightbolt4g.github.io/nitron/browser/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

75Good

How it's scored

9.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: adm-zip 0.5.18 (high 7.5), sharp 0.34.5 (high 8.4)
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	77
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	2

Matched the npm:nitron@2.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 77 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23/40	Legible commit history — 22 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.431
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 51
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/32 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	19,905
source_files_sampled	32
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

23GitHub stars

2contributors

51commits, last 12 months

9days since last push

8releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿

0Stars

4Forks

5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 3

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10

3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 14:29 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	adm-zip	`^0.5.17`	package.json
npm	chokidar	`^5.0.0`	package.json
npm	commander	`^13.1.0`	package.json
npm	jszip	`^3.10.1`	package.json
npm	open	`^11.0.0`	package.json
npm	picocolors	`^1.1.1`	package.json
npm	prompts	`^2.4.2`	package.json
npm	serve-handler	`^6.1.7`	package.json
npm	sharp	`^0.34.5`	package.json
npm	ws	`^8.20.0`	package.json

All dependencies 179

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 167 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	adm-zip	`0.5.17`	direct
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	direct
npm	chokidar	`5.0.0`	direct
npm	commander	`13.1.0`	direct
npm	commander	`4.1.1`	direct
npm	jszip	`3.10.1`	direct
npm	open	`11.0.0`	direct
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	direct
npm	prompts	`2.4.2`	direct
npm	serve-handler	`6.1.7`	direct
npm	sharp	`0.34.5`	direct
npm	ws	`8.20.0`	direct
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	@img/colour	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-arm64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-darwin-x64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x64	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-arm64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-ppc64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-riscv64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-s390x	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linux-x64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-wasm32	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-arm64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-ia32	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@img/sharp-win32-x64	`0.34.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	@types/adm-zip	`0.5.8`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`22.19.17`	indirect
npm	@types/prompts	`2.4.9`	indirect
npm	@types/serve-handler	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`8.18.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	any-promise	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.14`	indirect
npm	bundle-name	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	bundle-require	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	consola	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	default-browser	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	default-browser-id	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	define-lazy-prop	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.27.7`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fix-dts-default-cjs-exports	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	immediate	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-docker	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-in-ssh	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-inside-container	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-wsl	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	joycon	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	kleur	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lie	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	load-tsconfig	`0.2.5`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.18`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	mlly	`1.8.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	mz	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	pako	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	path-is-inside	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	pirates	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-load-config	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	powershell-utils	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.60.2`	indirect
npm	run-applescript	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	setimmediate	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	sisteransi	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.7.6`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	sucrase	`3.35.1`	indirect
npm	thenify	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	thenify-all	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.16`	indirect
npm	tree-kill	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	ts-interface-checker	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	tsup	`8.5.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.6.4`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	wsl-utils	`0.3.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

Installing npm:nitron@2.0.2 pulls in 77 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
adm-zip	`0.5.18`	direct	high	2	`0.6.0`
sharp	`0.34.5`	direct	high	2	`0.35.4`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records