Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-04 15:53 UTC

ARKlab / Artesian.SDK

C# Library for Artesian

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2018View on GitHub ↗

ARKlab/Artesian.SDK holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ARK EnergyOrganization
3 followers24 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetArtesian.SDK7.7.5-650 days agoarkc#visualstudioframeworkarkiveartesian

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume464 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year464
human_commit_share0.8
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases26 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 70 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~41.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv7.7.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release70
mean_days_between_releases41.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars0
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.5/80Total downloads89,592 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesArtesian.SDK
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads89,592
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.406
How it's scored
25.2/42Issue resolution60% of issues closed
26.9/30PR acceptance242/270 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs242
open_issues2
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.6
closed_unmerged_prs28
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach3 followers of ARKlab
22.2/25Track record24 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginARKlab
public_repos24
account_age_days5,205

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history65 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesArtesian.SDK
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.artesian.cloud/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsark, artesian, csharp, market-data, market-assessment, extraction, timeseries, energy-data
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.artesian.cloud/
docs_sitehttps://www.artesian.cloud/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages77
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 77 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://duckdb.org/llms.txt)
19.3/40Legible commit history29 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://duckdb.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.362
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,783
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapArtesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj, Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer
10/10Demonstrated agent practice6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifestsArtesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj, Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes2/194 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes114,719
source_files_sampled194
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
14contributors
464commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
26releases
2bus factor
2open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212018-082022-042025-11
Major 2Minor 6Patch 6

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-04 15:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAwesomeAssertions9.5.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport2.3.3Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.9.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.6.1Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel10.0.11Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild2.3.3Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.VSTestBridge2.3.3Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.Telemetry2.3.3Artesian/Artesian.SDK.Tests/Artesian.SDK.Tests.csproj
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetNodaTime.Serialization.SystemTextJson1.4.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetMessagePack3.1.8Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetMessagePack.NodaTime3.5.6Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetPolly8.7.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client4.87.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11Artesian/Artesian.SDK/Artesian.SDK.csproj
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 53 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAwesomeAssertions9.5.0direct
NuGetFlurl.Http2.3.2direct
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2direct
NuGetMessagePack3.1.8direct
NuGetMessagePack.NodaTime3.5.6direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client4.87.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.Telemetry2.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.Telemetry2.3.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport2.3.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.VSTestBridge2.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.VSTestBridge2.3.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild2.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild2.3.3direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetNodaTime.Serialization.SystemTextJson1.4.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.10.1direct
NuGetNUnit4.6.1direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.2.0direct
NuGetPolly8.7.0direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11direct
NuGetCastle.Core5.1.1indirect
NuGetFlurl2.7.1indirect
NuGetFlurl4.0.0indirect
NuGetMessagePack.Annotations3.1.8indirect
NuGetMessagePackAnalyzer3.1.8indirect
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzer3.0.147indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.23.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.TimeProvider8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Git10.0.400indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers10.0.400indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeCoverage18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader2.2.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Abstractions8.14.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.StringTools17.11.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net4621.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.Common10.0.400indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.400indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport.Abstractions2.3.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform2.3.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel18.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.TestHost18.8.1indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter1.2.0indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework1.2.0indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirect
NuGetNodaTime2.3.0indirect
NuGetNodaTime3.3.3indirect
NuGetNodaTime.Serialization.JsonNet2.0.0indirect
NuGetPolly.Core8.7.0indirect
NuGetPolySharp1.16.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource6.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.EventLog6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn18.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing10.0.11indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Pipelines10.0.11indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectors4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit4.7.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit.ILGeneration4.7.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit.Lightweight4.7.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Metadata8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Cng5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web10.0.11indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 77 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json11.0.2indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.