Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 21:40 UTC

Akshat2634 / Codelens-AI

Local-first ROI analytics for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub Copilot

JavaScript · HTMLMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverNetwork servicehow this is determined

#claude-ai #claude-code #claude-code-skills #ai-coding #analytics #cli #developer-tools #github-copilot #local-first #nodejs #openai-codex

Akshat2634/Codelens-AI holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akshat SahuPersonal account

14 followers49 public repossince Oct 2020Futurepath AI

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	codelens-ai	0.10.3	961	39	23 days ago	codelens claude codex copilot github-copilot cursor ai roi productivity tokens cost git dashboard

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 6 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 231 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	231
human_commit_share	0.92
days_since_last_push	6
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 45 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 23 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~4.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	45
latest_release_tag	v0.10.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	23
mean_days_between_releases	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical

How it's scored

16.2/60	Stars — 11 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	11
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

50Moderate

How it's scored

39.8/80	Monthly downloads — 961 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	codelens-ai
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	961
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.52

Issue & PR responsiveness

40Weak

How it's scored

9.3/42	Issue resolution — 22% of issues closed
25.3/30	PR acceptance — 86/102 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	86
open_issues	7
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	9
issue_closed_ratio	0.222
closed_unmerged_prs	16
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.5/25	Owner reach — 14 followers of Akshat2634
24.2/25	Track record — 49 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	14
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	Akshat2634
public_repos	49
account_age_days	2,161

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 23 days ago
20/20	Version history — 39 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	codelens-ai
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://codelensai-dev.vercel.app
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 11 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	claude-ai, claude-code, claude-code-skills, ai-coding, analytics, cli, developer-tools, github-copilot, local-first, nodejs, openai-codex
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://codelensai-dev.vercel.app
docs_site	https://codelensai-dev.vercel.app
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
4/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	109
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:codelens-ai@0.10.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 109 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://platform.claude.com/llms.txt)
39.4/40	Legible commit history — 68 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://platform.claude.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.739
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	17,122

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

70Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 52 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.52
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
53.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/42 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	68,576
source_files_sampled	42
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

11GitHub stars

3contributors

231commits, last 12 months

6days since last push

45releases

1bus factor

7open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

37Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 4Patch 33

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10

7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 21:40 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
8	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1	Vulnerabilities	9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`^1.30.0`	package.json
npm	commander	`^15.0.0`	package.json
npm	express	`^5.0.0`	package.json
npm	open	`^11.0.0`	package.json

All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 116 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`1.30.0`	direct
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	direct
npm	express	`5.2.1`	direct
npm	open	`11.0.0`	direct
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-x64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-arm64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-x64	`2.5.4`	indirect
npm	@hono/node-server	`1.19.17`	indirect
npm	@kurkle/color	`0.3.4`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	accepts	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	bundle-name	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	chart.js	`4.5.1`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	content-type	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.6`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	default-browser	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	default-browser-id	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	define-lazy-prop	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	eventsource	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	eventsource-parser	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	express-rate-limit	`8.5.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	hono	`4.13.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-docker	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-in-ssh	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-inside-container	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-wsl	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jose	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-typed	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	pkce-challenge	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	powershell-utils	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.3`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	router	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	run-applescript	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-is	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	wsl-utils	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	zod-to-json-schema	`3.25.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:codelens-ai@0.10.3 pulls in 109 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records