Public record
Software health reportschema 0.32.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-20 08:54 UTC

Alexhuszagh / float16

Minimal half-precision floating point types f16 and bf16 for Rust.

RustApache-2.0★ 3 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗

Alexhuszagh/float16 holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alexander HuszaghPersonal account
81 followers151 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iofloat160.1.7401,20286 days agobfloat16f16no-stdencodingdata-structures

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 6 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume33 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases8 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.1.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
74.7/80Monthly downloads401,202 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfloat16
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads2,521,637
monthly_downloads401,202
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 72% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.715
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance28/29 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs28
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d14
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.8/25Owner reach81 followers of Alexhuszagh
25/25Track record151 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers81
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginAlexhuszagh
public_repos151
account_age_days4,313
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history8 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfloat16
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests19 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/float16/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfloat16, half-precision
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.rs/float16/
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/float16/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests19 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:float16@0.1.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.5/40Legible commit history23 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.235
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,454
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, devel/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, devel/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
48.5/55Manageable file sizes2/17 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes72,221
source_files_sampled17
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

3GitHub stars
28contributors
33commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'float16-benchmark' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312025-122026-032026-06
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-20 08:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests19 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iofloat16devel/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0direct
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.10indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.4.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.16.0indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.4.2indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.23indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.23indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.4indirect
crates.iocriterion0.8.2indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.5indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.20indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.2indirect
crates.ioeither1.13.0indirect
crates.ioenv_filter2.0.0indirect
crates.ioenv_logger0.11.11indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.10indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.4.1indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.14indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.76indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.168indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.4indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.20.2indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.4indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.92indirect
crates.ioquickcheck1.1.0indirect
crates.ioquickcheck_macros1.2.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.37indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.10.2indirect
crates.iorand_core0.10.1indirect
crates.iorayon1.10.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.12.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.18indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.216indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.216indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.133indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.90indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.14indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.99indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.99indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.76indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:float16@0.1.7 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.32.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.