Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-31 22:33 UTC

AvaloniaCommunity / Material.Avalonia

Material design in AvaloniaUI

C#MIT★ 1,153 stars⑂ 116 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#avalonia#material#material-design#dotnet#avaloniaui#google-material#google-material-design

AvaloniaCommunity/Material.Avalonia holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Avalonia CommunityOrganization
372 followers11 public repossince Dec 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMaterial.Avalonia.DataGrid3.17.0-4674 days agoavaloniaxamlmaterialdesignthemedatagridcolourcoloruiuxmaterial-designgoogle-material
NuGetMaterial.Avalonia.Dialogs3.17.0-4674 days agoavaloniaxamlmaterialdesignthemedialogscolourcoloruiuxmaterial-designgoogle-material
NuGetMaterial.Avalonia3.17.0-6074 days agoavaloniaxamlmaterialdesignthemecolourcoloruiuxmaterial-designgoogle-material

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
14.6/18Commit volume — 41 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year41
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 61 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 74 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~21.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagv3.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release74
mean_days_between_releases21.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good
How it's scored
49.7/60Stars — 1,153 stars
17.2/25Forks — 116 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks116
stars1,153
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

76Good
How it's scored
60.9/80Total downloads — 728,397 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMaterial.Avalonia.DataGrid, Material.Avalonia.Dialogs, Material.Avalonia
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads728,397
monthly_downloads—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.453

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent
How it's scored
39.1/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 166/172 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs166
open_issues18
closed_issues241
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.931
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.5/25Owner reach — 372 followers of AvaloniaCommunity
19.9/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers372
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginAvaloniaCommunity
public_repos11
account_age_days2,419

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 74 days ago
20/20Version history — 60 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMaterial.Avalonia.DataGrid, Material.Avalonia.Dialogs, Material.Avalonia
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish74

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsavalonia, material, material-design, dotnet, avaloniaui, google-material, google-material-design
has_wikiyes
homepage—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

29At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28.8/40Legible commit history — 54 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.54
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

24At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Material.Avalonia.DataGrid/Material.Avalonia.DataGrid.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsMaterial.Avalonia.DataGrid/Material.Avalonia.DataGrid.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj, Material.Avalonia.Dialogs/Material.Avalonia.Dialogs.csproj, Material.Avalonia/Material.Avalonia.csproj, Material.Colors/Material.Colors.csproj, Material.Ripple/Material.Ripple.csproj, Material.Styles/Material.Styles.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/229 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes31,606
source_files_sampled229
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,153GitHub stars
37contributors
41commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
61releases
2bus factor
18open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 116 ⇿
0Stars
116Forks
61Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011542019-112023-032026-07
Major 2Minor 21Patch 33

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-31 22:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained8 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.DataGrid—Material.Avalonia.DataGrid/Material.Avalonia.DataGrid.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Browser—Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser.csproj
NuGetTextMateSharp.Wasm—Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Browser.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop/Material.Avalonia.Demo.Desktop.csproj
NuGetAvaloniaUI.DiagnosticsSupport—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.DataGrid—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Simple—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetMaterial.Icons.Avalonia—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetDialogHost.Avalonia—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia.AvaloniaEdit—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia.Generator—Material.Avalonia.Demo/Material.Avalonia.Demo.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.ItemsRepeater—Material.Avalonia.Dialogs/Material.Avalonia.Dialogs.csproj
NuGetIgnoresAccessChecksToGenerator—Material.Ripple/Material.Ripple.csproj
NuGetaqua.tool.polyfill.IsExternalInit—Material.Styles/Material.Styles.csproj
All dependencies 14

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetaqua.tool.polyfill.IsExternalInit—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Browser—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.DataGrid—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.ItemsRepeater—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Simple—direct
NuGetAvaloniaUI.DiagnosticsSupport—direct
NuGetDialogHost.Avalonia—direct
NuGetIgnoresAccessChecksToGenerator—direct
NuGetMaterial.Icons.Avalonia—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia.AvaloniaEdit—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXaml.Avalonia.Generator—direct
NuGetTextMateSharp.Wasm—direct
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with AvaloniaCommunity/Material.Avalonia. Read them side by side →

92MaterialDesignInXAML/MaterialDesignInXamlToolkitGoogle's Material Design in XAML & WPF, for C# & VB.Net. Excellent89lepoco/wpfuiWPF UI provides the Fluent experience in your known and loved WPF framework. Intuitive design, themes, navigation and new immersive controls. All natively and effortlessly.Excellent89serenity-is/SerenityBusiness Apps Made Simple with Asp.Net Core MVC / TypeScriptExcellent94vuetifyjs/vuetify🐉 Vue Component FrameworkExceptional91WTTJ/welcome-uiCustomizable design system from Welcome to the jungle (@wttj) with react, typescript, tailwindcss, ariakit and a lot of love 💛 Here you'll find all the core components you need to create a delightful webapp.Excellent90sanity-io/uiThe Sanity UI design system.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.