Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 21:48 UTC

MaterialDesignInXAML / MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit

Google's Material Design in XAML & WPF, for C# & VB.Net.

C#MIT★ 16,257 stars⑂ 3,497 forkssince Feb 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

MaterialDesignInXAML/MaterialDesignInXamlToolkit holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (88/100) and lowest on Security (66/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

301 followers5 public repossince Jan 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMaterialDesignColors5.3.2-33138 days agowpfxamlmaterialdesigncolourcoloruiux
NuGetMaterialDesignThemes5.3.2-113138 days agowpfxamlmaterialdesignthemecolourcoloruiux
NuGetMaterialDesignThemes.MahApps5.3.2-37138 days agowpfxamlmahappsmaterialdesignthemecolourcoloruiux

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 99 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year99
human_commit_share0.84
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 46 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 138 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~133.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tagv5.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release138
mean_days_between_releases133.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 16,257 stars
25/25Forks — 3,497 forks
15/15Watchers — 505 watchers
Inputs used
forks3,497
stars16,257
watchers505
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges22
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesopencollective.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
76.5/80Total downloads — 22,842,251 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMaterialDesignColors, MaterialDesignThemes, MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads22,842,251
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.314
How it's scored
39/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance — 1,610/1,821 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 16/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs1,610
open_issues145
closed_issues1,881
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d12
prs_decided_30d13
issue_closed_ratio0.928
closed_unmerged_prs211
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.8/25Owner reach — 301 followers of MaterialDesignInXAML
17.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers301
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginMaterialDesignInXAML
public_repos5
account_age_days3,901

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 138 days ago
20/20Version history — 113 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMaterialDesignColors, MaterialDesignThemes, MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish138

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsc-sharp, material, xaml, theme, dragablz, design, material-design, wpf, hacktoberfest, hacktoberfest2020
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 16/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages26
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 4 resolved dependencies against OSV. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 78 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.929
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,489
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj, src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj, src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 16 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifestssrc/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj, src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj, src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj, src/MaterialDesign3.MaterialColorUtilities/MaterialColorUtilities.csproj, src/MaterialDesign3.Motion/Motion.csproj, src/MaterialDesignColors.Wpf/MaterialDesignColors.Wpf.csproj, src/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared.csproj, src/MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps/MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps.csproj, src/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf.csproj, src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj, tests/MaterialColorUtilities.Tests/MaterialColorUtilities.Tests.csproj, tests/MaterialDesignColors.Wpf.Tests/MaterialDesignColors.Wpf.Tests.csproj, tests/MaterialDesignThemes.UITests/MaterialDesignThemes.UITests.csproj, tests/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf.Tests/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.16
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 7/749 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes2,918,604
source_files_sampled749
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16,257GitHub stars
97contributors
99commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
46releases
2bus factor
145open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'MaterialDesignMotion' from its registry
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'MaterialDesignColorUtilities' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3,497 ⇿
0Stars
3,497Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2,5002,7503,0003,2503,5003,497102021-122024-052026-09
Major 1Minor 9Patch 5

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 21:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 16/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained21 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetDragablz—src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj
NuGetMahApps.Metro—src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML—src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.AvalonEdit—src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.MSBuild—src/MahMaterialDragablzMashUp/MahAppsDragablzDemo.csproj
NuGetBluwolfIcons—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetVirtualizingWrapPanel—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.AvalonEdit—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.MSBuild—src/MainDemo.Wpf/MaterialDesignDemo.csproj
NuGetBluwolfIcons—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetVirtualizingWrapPanel—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.AvalonEdit—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.MSBuild—src/MaterialDesign3.Demo.Wpf/MaterialDesign3Demo.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory—src/MaterialDesign3.MaterialColorUtilities/MaterialColorUtilities.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple—src/MaterialDesign3.MaterialColorUtilities/MaterialColorUtilities.csproj
NuGetPolyfill—src/MaterialDesign3.MaterialColorUtilities/MaterialColorUtilities.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory—src/MaterialDesign3.Motion/Motion.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple—src/MaterialDesign3.Motion/Motion.csproj
NuGetPolyfill—src/MaterialDesign3.Motion/Motion.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode—src/MaterialDesign3.Motion/Motion.csproj
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm—src/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML—src/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared.csproj
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.MSBuild—src/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared/MaterialDesignDemo.Shared.csproj
NuGetMahApps.Metro—src/MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps/MaterialDesignThemes.MahApps.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf—src/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf/MaterialDesignThemes.Wpf.csproj
NuGetHumanizer—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Common—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—src/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration/MaterialDesignToolkit.ResourceGeneration.csproj
All dependencies 30

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBluwolfIcons—direct
NuGetCommunityToolkit.Mvvm—direct
NuGetDragablz—direct
NuGetHumanizer—direct
NuGetMahApps.Metro—direct
NuGetMahApps.Metro2.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Common—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf1.1.39direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—direct
NuGetPolyfill—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXAML—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.AvalonEdit—direct
NuGetShowMeTheXAML.MSBuild—direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—direct
NuGetSystem.Memory—direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple—direct
NuGetVirtualizingWrapPanel—direct
NuGetMaterialDesignColors0.0.0indirect
NuGetMaterialDesignThemes0.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetShouldly—indirect
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri—indirect
NuGetTUnit—indirect
NuGetXAMLTest—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 4 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 26 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.