Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-04 16:42 UTC

Codeception / module-symfony

Codeception module for testing apps using Symfony framework

PHPMIT★ 96 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Sep 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Codeception/module-symfony holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 24 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Codeception Testing FrameworkOrganization
54 followers78 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcodeception/module-symfony3.10.1237,1893724 days agosymfonycodeceptionfunctional-testing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 24 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push24
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 37 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~54.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tag3.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases54.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

45Weak
How it's scored
32.1/60Stars — 96 stars
11.5/25Forks — 25 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars96
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

85Excellent
How it's scored
71.7/80Monthly downloads — 237,189 downloads/month across packagist
13.4/20Registry dependents — 102 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescodeception/module-symfony
dependents102
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads10,322,886
monthly_downloads237,189

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.566

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
41.1/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance — 165/190 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs165
open_issues1
closed_issues47
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.979
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.5/25Owner reach — 54 followers of Codeception
25/25Track record — 78 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginCodeception
public_repos78
account_age_days5,333

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 24 days ago
20/20Version history — 37 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescodeception/module-symfony
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

78Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

40Weak
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

38Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.9/40Legible commit history — 71 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.71
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/70 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes18,359
source_files_sampled70
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

96GitHub stars
30contributors
22commits, last 12 months
24days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05101520252512020-022023-042026-05
Major 2Minor 16Patch 15

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 16:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests22 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcodeception/lib-innerbrowser^3.1 | ^4.1composer.json
All dependencies 50

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcodeception/lib-innerbrowser—direct
Packagistcodeception/module-asserts—indirect
Packagistcodeception/module-doctrine—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/orm—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/cache—indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock—indirect
Packagistsymfony/config—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console—indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dotenv—indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher—indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem—indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder—indirect
Packagistsymfony/form—indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer—indirect
Packagistsymfony/messenger—indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime—indirect
Packagistsymfony/notifier—indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver—indirect
Packagistsymfony/password-hasher—indirect
Packagistsymfony/process—indirect
Packagistsymfony/property-access—indirect
Packagistsymfony/property-info—indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-core—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-csrf—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-http—indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch—indirect
Packagistsymfony/string—indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/validator—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Codeception/module-symfony. Read them side by side →

65Codeception/module-phpbrowserPhpBrowser module for CodeceptionGood98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional97symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional96symfony/uxSymfony UX initiative: a JavaScript ecosystem for SymfonyExceptional96api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional96dunglas/dunglasapibundleThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.