Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 09:40 UTC

Comfy-Org / comfy-cli

CLI for using ComfyUI

PythonGPL-3.0★ 1,020 stars⑂ 164 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

Comfy-Org/comfy-cli holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (71/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Comfy OrgOrganization
3,807 followers87 public repossince Apr 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIcomfy-cli1.22.078,72610120 days agocomfyuistable-diffusion

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 493 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year493
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.22.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases7.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.8/60Stars — 1,020 stars
18.4/25Forks — 164 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks164
stars1,020
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65.3/80Monthly downloads — 78,726 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescomfy-cli
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads78,726
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 21% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 41 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled41
top_contributor_share0.214
How it's scored
34.1/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance — 674/749 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs674
open_issues42
closed_issues180
prs_merged_7d34
prs_decided_7d36
prs_merged_30d52
prs_decided_30d59
issue_closed_ratio0.811
closed_unmerged_prs75
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,807 followers of Comfy-Org
18.1/25Track record — 87 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,807
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginComfy-Org
public_repos87
account_age_days923

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 20 days ago
20/20Version history — 101 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescomfy-cli
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 15 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.comfy.org/comfy-cli/getting-started
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, comfyui, command-line, stable-diffusion
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.comfy.org/comfy-cli/getting-started
docs_sitehttps://docs.comfy.org/comfy-cli/getting-started
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages54
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:comfy-cli@1.22.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 54 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.comfy.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.comfy.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,164
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — pyrightconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 41 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspyrightconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.41
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (pyrightconfig.json)
51.9/55Manageable file sizes — 29/511 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes259,826
source_files_sampled511
oversized_source_files29
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — comfy_cli/command/generate/spec/openapi.yml
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filescomfy_cli/command/generate/spec/openapi.yml
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,020GitHub stars
41contributors
493commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
42open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 164 ⇿
0Stars
164Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020016452024-052025-072026-10
Major 0Minor 22Patch 60

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 09:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcertifi>=2024.7.4pyproject.toml
PyPIcharset-normalizer>=3pyproject.toml
PyPIcookiecutter—pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython>=3.1.50pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx—pyproject.toml
PyPImixpanel<5pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging—pyproject.toml
PyPIpathspec—pyproject.toml
PyPIposthog>=6,<8pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=6pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary—pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPIrich—pyproject.toml
PyPIruff—pyproject.toml
PyPIsemver~=3.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPItomlkit>=0.13,<0.16pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.12.5pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.7pyproject.toml
PyPIuv>=0.11.15pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsocket-client—pyproject.toml
PyPIimageio-ffmpeg—pyproject.toml
PyPIblake3>=1.0.9pyproject.toml
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 59 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIblake31.0.9direct
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3direct
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.2direct
PyPIcookiecutter2.6.0direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.54direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIimageio-ffmpeg0.6.0direct
PyPImixpanel4.10.1direct
PyPIpackaging25.0direct
PyPIpathspec0.12.1direct
PyPIposthog7.18.1direct
PyPIpsutil7.0.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2direct
PyPIquestionary2.1.0direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPIrich14.1.0direct
PyPIruff0.15.15direct
PyPIsemver3.0.4direct
PyPItomlkit0.13.3direct
PyPItyper0.27.2direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.14.1direct
PyPIuv0.11.20direct
PyPIwebsocket-client1.8.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIanyio4.10.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.3.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIbinaryornot0.4.4indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomfy-cli0.0.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.2indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.12indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.9.1indirect
PyPInumpy—indirect
PyPIpillow10.4.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.8indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.2.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.2.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsympy—indirect
PyPIterm-image0.7.2indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItqdm1.0indirect
PyPItqdm2.0.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.66.4indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20250708indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:comfy-cli@1.22.0 pulls in 54 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.