Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 11:10 UTC

Consensys / etcd

Distributed reliable key-value store for the most critical data of a distributed system

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2021archivedforkView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined

Consensys/etcd holds a health index of 14 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (13/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

14
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

14
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ConsensysOrganization
2,948 followers291 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-23551 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6851 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6851 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.5.33-4151 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6851 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/etcdctl/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6851 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/etcdutl/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6751 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2points to another repo — not scoredv2.305.33-4451 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6851 days ago
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.7.1-6751 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,251 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,251
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 22 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,831 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv3.5.0-quorum2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,831
mean_days_between_releases12.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

13Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

2Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges10
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.364

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
24.9/25Owner reach — 2,948 followers of Consensys
25/25Track record — 291 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,948
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginConsensys
public_repos291
account_age_days4,240

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

40Weak
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://etcd.io
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://etcd.io
docs_sitehttps://etcd.io
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 82 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.82
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, hack/tls-setup/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, hack/tls-setup/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsapi/go.mod, client/pkg/go.mod, client/v2/go.mod, client/v3/go.mod, etcdctl/go.mod, etcdutl/go.mod, go.mod, pkg/go.mod, raft/go.mod, server/go.mod, tests/go.mod, tools/mod/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 9/1,022 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes665,145
source_files_sampled1,022
oversized_source_files9

Machine-readable interfaces

80Excellent
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — api/authpb/auth.proto, api/etcdserverpb/etcdserver.proto, api/etcdserverpb/raft_internal.proto, api/etcdserverpb/rpc.proto, api/membershippb/membership.proto, api/mvccpb/kv.proto, raft/raftpb/raft.proto, server/etcdserver/api/snap/snappb/snap.proto, server/etcdserver/api/v3election/v3electionpb/v3election.proto, server/etcdserver/api/v3lock/v3lockpb/v3lock.proto, server/lease/leasepb/lease.proto, server/wal/walpb/record.proto, tests/functional/rpcpb/rpc.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, recipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesapi/authpb/auth.proto, api/etcdserverpb/etcdserver.proto, api/etcdserverpb/raft_internal.proto, api/etcdserverpb/rpc.proto, api/membershippb/membership.proto, api/mvccpb/kv.proto, raft/raftpb/raft.proto, server/etcdserver/api/snap/snappb/snap.proto, server/etcdserver/api/v3election/v3electionpb/v3election.proto, server/etcdserver/api/v3lock/v3lockpb/v3lock.proto, server/lease/leasepb/lease.proto, server/wal/walpb/record.proto, tests/functional/rpcpb/rpc.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
100contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,251days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/etcdctl/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/etcdutl/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/tools/v3' from its registry
  • go package 'go.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212021-122022-062022-12
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 11:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 32 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 134
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-semverv0.3.0api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.2api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gatewayv1.16.0api/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20210602131652-f16073e35f0capi/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.1.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv0.0.5etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.1.3etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cliv1.22.4etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2v2.305.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3v3.5.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/etcdutl/v3v3.5.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3v3.5.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.0.0-20210220033141-f8bda1e9f3baetcdctl/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0etcdctl/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/cheggaaa/pb.v1v1.0.28etcdctl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv0.0.5etcdutl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.1.3etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.6etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3v3.5.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0etcdutl/go.mod
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.1.3go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.6go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2v2.305.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/etcdctl/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/etcdutl/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/tests/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.0.0-20210220033141-f8bda1e9f3bago.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/cheggaaa/pb.v1v1.0.28go.mod
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.11pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.1.3pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.7.0pkg/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0pkg/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0pkg/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/cockroachdb/datadrivenv0.0.0-20200714090401-bf6692d28da5raft/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2raft/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.2raft/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0raft/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-semverv0.3.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.3.2server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/form3tech-oss/jwt-gov3.2.3+incompatibleserver/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daserver/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.2server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/btreev1.0.1server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middlewarev1.3.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheusv1.2.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gatewayv1.16.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jonboulle/clockworkv0.2.2server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.11.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_modelv0.2.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/soheilhy/cmuxv0.1.5server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.1.3server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.7.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/tmc/grpc-websocket-proxyv0.0.0-20201229170055-e5319fda7802server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/xiang90/probingv0.0.0-20190116061207-43a291ad63a2server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.3.6server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v2v2.305.0server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3v3.5.0server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/pkg/v3v3.5.0server/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/raft/v3v3.5.0server/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.20.0server/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv0.20.0server/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlpv0.20.0server/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv0.20.0server/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.7.0server/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0server/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.0.0-20210513164829-c07d793c2f9aserver/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.0.0-20210525063256-abc453219eb5server/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.0.0-20210220033141-f8bda1e9f3baserver/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20210602131652-f16073e35f0cserver/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0server/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.0.0server/go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.2.0server/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.3.2client/pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.7.0client/pkg/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0client/pkg/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.0.0-20210603125802-9665404d3644client/pkg/go.mod
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.11client/v2/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.1client/v2/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0client/v2/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0client/v2/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheusv1.2.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.11.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3v3.5.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3v3.5.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.17.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.38.0client/v3/go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.2.0client/v3/go.mod
Gogithub.com/alexkohler/nakedretv1.0.0tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/chzchzchz/gowordv0.0.0-20170907005317-a9744cb52b03tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/license-bill-of-materialsv0.0.0-20190913234955-13baff47494etools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gordonklaus/ineffassignv0.0.0-20200809085317-e36bfde3bb78tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gatewayv1.14.6tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gyuho/gocovmergev0.0.0-20171205171859-50c7e6afd535tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/hexfusion/schwagv0.0.0-20170606222847-b7d0fc9aadaatools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mdempsky/unconvertv0.0.0-20200228143138-95ecdbfc0b5ftools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mgechev/revivev1.0.2tools/mod/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mikefarah/yq/v3v3.0.0-20201125113350-f42728eef735tools/mod/go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/protodocv0.0.0-20180829002748-484ab544e116tools/mod/go.mod
Gogotest.toolsv2.2.0+incompatibletools/mod/go.mod
Gogotest.tools/gotestsumv0.3.5tools/mod/go.mod
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.0.0-20190523083050-ea95bdfd59fctools/mod/go.mod
Gomvdan.cc/unparamv0.0.0-20200501210554-b37ab49443f7tools/mod/go.mod
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Consensys/etcd. Read them side by side →

100cloudnative-pg/cloudnative-pgThe most popular Kubernetes Operator for PostgreSQL.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100prometheus/prometheusThe Prometheus monitoring system and time series database.Exceptional100go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional100moby/mobyThe Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systemsExceptional100pingcap/tidbTiDB is built for agentic workloads that grow unpredictably, with ACID guarantees and native support for transactions, analytics, and vector search. No data silos. No noisy neighbors. No infrastructure ceiling.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.