Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 14:35 UTC

DataDog / dd-trace-java

Datadog APM client for Java

Java · Groovy · FreeMarkerApache-2.0★ 727 stars⑂ 344 forkssince Apr 2017View on GitHub ↗

DataDog/dd-trace-java holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated today. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Datadog, Inc.Organization
3,228 followers1,194 public repossince Aug 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume2,082 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,082
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~12.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.64.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases12.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
46.4/60Stars727 stars
21.1/25Forks344 forks
15/15Watchers630 watchers
Inputs used
forks344
stars727
watchers630
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 12% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.123
How it's scored
29.7/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance9,385/10,973 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs9,385
open_issues251
closed_issues609
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.708
closed_unmerged_prs1,588
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach3,228 followers of DataDog
25/25Track record1,194 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,228
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginDataDog
public_repos1,194
account_age_days5,818
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows18 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.datadoghq.com/tracing/languages/java
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapm, java, datadog, datadog-apm, datadoghq, tracing, javaagent, bytebuddy, distributed-tracing, distributed-trace, profiling
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.datadoghq.com/tracing/languages/java
docs_sitehttps://docs.datadoghq.com/tracing/languages/java
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifestsbuild.gradle.kts, buildSrc/build.gradle.kts, communication/build.gradle.kts, dd-java-agent/build.gradle, dd-smoke-tests/build.gradle, dd-trace-api/build.gradle.kts, dd-trace-core/build.gradle, dd-trace-ot/build.gradle.kts, internal-api/build.gradle.kts, telemetry/build.gradle.kts, test-published-dependencies/build.gradle.kts
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configyes

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages34
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 34 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,435
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes10/6,314 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes288,384
source_files_sampled6,314
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)dd-java-agent/agent-iast/src/test/proto/test2.proto, dd-java-agent/agent-iast/src/test/proto/test3.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/armeria/armeria-grpc-0.84/src/test/proto/helloworld.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/graphql-java/graphql-java-14.0/src/test/resources/schema.graphqls, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/graphql-java/graphql-java-20.0/src/test/resources/schema.graphqls, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/grpc-1.5/src/test/proto/helloworld.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/protobuf-3.0/src/test/proto/message.proto, dd-smoke-tests/appsec/springboot-graphql/src/main/resources/graphql/schema.graphqls, dd-smoke-tests/armeria-grpc/application/src/main/proto/hello.proto, dd-smoke-tests/armeria-grpc/application/src/main/proto/iast.proto, dd-smoke-tests/datastreams/kafkaschemaregistry/src/main/java/datadog/smoketest/datastreams/kafkaschemaregistry/message.proto, dd-smoke-tests/grpc-1.5/src/main/proto/iast.proto, dd-smoke-tests/springboot-grpc/src/main/proto/message.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/common/v1/common.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/logs/v1/logs.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/metrics/v1/metrics.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/resource/v1/resource.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, sample, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, sample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdd-java-agent/agent-iast/src/test/proto/test2.proto, dd-java-agent/agent-iast/src/test/proto/test3.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/armeria/armeria-grpc-0.84/src/test/proto/helloworld.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/graphql-java/graphql-java-14.0/src/test/resources/schema.graphqls, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/graphql-java/graphql-java-20.0/src/test/resources/schema.graphqls, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/grpc-1.5/src/test/proto/helloworld.proto, dd-java-agent/instrumentation/protobuf-3.0/src/test/proto/message.proto, dd-smoke-tests/appsec/springboot-graphql/src/main/resources/graphql/schema.graphqls, dd-smoke-tests/armeria-grpc/application/src/main/proto/hello.proto, dd-smoke-tests/armeria-grpc/application/src/main/proto/iast.proto, dd-smoke-tests/datastreams/kafkaschemaregistry/src/main/java/datadog/smoketest/datastreams/kafkaschemaregistry/message.proto, dd-smoke-tests/grpc-1.5/src/main/proto/iast.proto, dd-smoke-tests/springboot-grpc/src/main/proto/message.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/common/v1/common.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/logs/v1/logs.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/metrics/v1/metrics.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/resource/v1/resource.proto, dd-trace-core/src/test/resources/opentelemetry/proto/trace/v1/trace.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

727GitHub stars
100contributors
2,082commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
7bus factor
251open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code -9); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 727 ★ / 344 ⇿
727Stars
344Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750727337132017-062021-122026-07

Each point covers 9 days.

All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavench.qos.logback:logback-classic1.5.11indirect
Mavencom.datadoghq:dd-trace-api1.42.0indirect
Mavencom.datadoghq:java-dogstatsd-client2.11.0indirect
Mavenio.cucumber:cucumber-java5.4.0indirect
Mavenio.cucumber:cucumber-java7.22.0indirect
Mavenio.cucumber:cucumber-junit5.4.0indirect
Mavenio.cucumber:cucumber-junit-platform-engine7.22.0indirect
Mavenio.openliberty.tools:liberty-maven-plugin3.2.3indirect
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-api1.62.0indirect
Mavenio.projectreactor:reactor-core3.6.11indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.groovy:groovyindirect
Mavenorg.apache.groovy:groovy-bom4.0.30indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin3.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.7.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin3.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin2.12.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin2.17indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.gmavenplus:gmavenplus-plugin4.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin1.5indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:properties-maven-plugin1.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.15indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-apiindirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine5.11.2indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine5.9.2indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-runnerindirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-suiteindirect
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom5.10.2indirect
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom5.13.0indirect
Mavenorg.mule.connectors:mule-http-connector1.9.2indirect
Mavenorg.mule.connectors:mule-sockets-connector1.2.4indirect
Mavenorg.mule.module:mule-java-module1.2.13indirect
Mavenorg.mule.tools.maven:mule-maven-plugin3.8.6indirect
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok1.18.18indirect
Mavenorg.spockframework:spock-bom2.4-M6-groovy-4.0indirect
Mavenorg.spockframework:spock-coreindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-actuatorindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-testindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 34 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.