Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 04:09 UTC

DataDog / pprof-format

Pure JavaScript pprof encoder and decoder

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗

DataDog/pprof-format holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (58/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Datadog, Inc.Organization

3,246 followers1,198 public repossince Aug 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	pprof-format	2.3.0	40,353,582	15	10 days ago	pprof encode decode profile

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9/36	Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
14.7/18	Commit volume — 42 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	42
human_commit_share	0.721
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	13

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 15 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~153.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	15
latest_release_tag	v2.3.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	10
mean_days_between_releases	153.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

22At Risk

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
4/25	Forks — 4 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	4
stars	8
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 40,353,582 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	pprof-format
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	40,353,582
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

58Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.462

Issue & PR responsiveness

93Exceptional

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
23.7/30	PR acceptance — 64/81 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	64
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	7
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	17
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25	Owner reach — 3,246 followers of DataDog
25/25	Track record — 1,198 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,246
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	DataDog
public_repos	1,198
account_age_days	5,832

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20	Version history — 15 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	pprof-format
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

58Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	decoder, encoder, nodejs, pprof
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 15 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	7
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	176
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 4
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 176 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 35 of 44 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.795
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 61 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 61 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.148
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.246

Code legibility for models

73Good

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
45.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/6 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	175,950
source_files_sampled	6
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — testing/proto/profile.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	testing/proto/profile.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars

8contributors

42commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

15releases

2bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿

0Stars

4Forks

1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10

6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 04:09 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5	CI-Tests	15 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
7	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@jsdoc/salty	`0.2.12`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/linkify-it	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/markdown-it	`14.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/parser	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/project-service	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/scope-manager	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/type-utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-darwin-arm64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-darwin-x64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-linux-arm	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-linux-arm64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-linux-x64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-win32-arm64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview-win32-x64	`7.0.0-dev.20260407.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	bluebird	`3.7.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.16`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	catharsis	`0.9.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.6.2`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.7.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`9.6.1`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	glob	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	js2xmlparser	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	jsdoc	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonc-simple-parser	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	klaw	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	linkify-it	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	long	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.3.2`	indirect
npm	markdown-it	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	markdown-it-anchor	`8.6.7`	indirect
npm	marked	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`5.1.9`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	polite-json	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	protobufjs	`8.7.1`	indirect
npm	protobufjs-cli	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	punycode.js	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	reghex	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	requizzle	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-import	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`6.1.3`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	sync-content	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tmp	`0.2.7`	indirect
npm	ts-api-utils	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	tshy	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	uc.micro	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	underscore	`1.13.8`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	walk-up-path	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xmlcreate	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 176 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`1.1.16`	indirect	high	2	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`2.1.2`	indirect	high	2	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect	high	2	`5.0.9`
linkify-it	`5.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`5.0.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records