Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 16:43 UTC

DataTables / DateTime

Data / time picker used for DataTables.net components

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗

DataTables/DateTime holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SpryMedia LimitedOrganization
155 followers207 public repossince May 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdatatables.net-datetime2.0.047,5413510 days agodatetablesdatetimepicker
Packagistdatatables.net/datatables.net-datetime2.0.0375812 days agotimedatedatatables

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
15.7/18Commit volume55 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year55
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases34 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 12 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~123.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count34
latest_release_tag2.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release12
mean_days_between_releases123.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars11 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars11
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.4/80Monthly downloads47,916 downloads/month across npm, packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdatatables.net-datetime, datatables.net/datatables.net-datetime
dependents0
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
total_downloads2,838
monthly_downloads47,916
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 91% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.914
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance11/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.8/25Owner reach155 followers of DataTables
25/25Track record207 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers155
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginDataTables
public_repos207
account_age_days5,923
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on npm, packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdatatables.net-datetime, datatables.net/datatables.net-datetime
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages3
assessed_packages160
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 160 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.2/40Legible commit history17 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.172
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/37 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes44,239
source_files_sampled37
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars
5contributors
55commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
34releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:datatables.net-datetime@2.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
18Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412020-072022-102025-01
Major 1Minor 5Patch 12

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 16:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmdatatables.net^3package.json
All dependencies 160

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 160 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@gulpjs/messages1.1.0indirect
npm@gulpjs/to-absolute-glob4.0.0indirect
npmansi-colors1.1.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-wrap0.1.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarr-diff4.0.0indirect
npmarr-union3.1.0indirect
npmarray-each1.0.1indirect
npmarray-slice1.1.0indirect
npmassign-symbols1.0.0indirect
npmasync-done2.0.0indirect
npmasync-settle2.0.0indirect
npmb4a1.6.6indirect
npmbach2.0.1indirect
npmbare-events2.3.1indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbl5.1.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmclone2.1.2indirect
npmclone-stats1.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcopy-props4.0.0indirect
npmdetect-file1.0.0indirect
npmeach-props3.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmescalade3.1.2indirect
npmexpand-tilde2.0.2indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextend-shallow3.0.2indirect
npmfast-fifo1.3.2indirect
npmfast-levenshtein3.0.0indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfindup-sync5.0.0indirect
npmfined2.0.0indirect
npmflagged-respawn2.0.0indirect
npmfor-in1.0.2indirect
npmfor-own1.0.0indirect
npmfs-mkdirp-stream2.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglob-stream8.0.2indirect
npmglob-watcher6.0.0indirect
npmglobal-modules1.0.0indirect
npmglobal-prefix1.0.2indirect
npmglogg2.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmgulp5.0.0indirect
npmgulp-cli3.0.0indirect
npmgulp-sass5.0.0indirect
npmgulplog2.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhomedir-polyfill1.0.3indirect
npmiconv-lite0.6.3indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npminterpret3.1.1indirect
npmis-absolute1.0.0indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.13.1indirect
npmis-extendable1.0.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-negated-glob1.0.0indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmis-plain-object5.0.0indirect
npmis-relative1.0.0indirect
npmis-unc-path1.0.0indirect
npmis-valid-glob1.0.0indirect
npmis-windows1.0.2indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmlast-run2.0.0indirect
npmlead4.0.0indirect
npmliftoff5.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmmap-cache0.2.2indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.7indirect
npmmute-stdout2.0.0indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnow-and-later3.0.0indirect
npmobject.defaults1.1.0indirect
npmobject.pick1.3.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparse-filepath1.0.2indirect
npmparse-passwd1.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-root0.1.1indirect
npmpath-root-regex0.1.2indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmplugin-error1.0.1indirect
npmqueue-tick1.0.1indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrechoir0.8.0indirect
npmremove-trailing-separator1.1.0indirect
npmreplace-ext2.0.0indirect
npmreplace-homedir2.0.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmresolve-dir1.0.1indirect
npmresolve-options2.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsass1.43.4indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsemver-greatest-satisfied-range2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.5.7indirect
npmsparkles2.1.0indirect
npmstream-composer1.0.2indirect
npmstream-exhaust1.0.2indirect
npmstreamx2.18.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsver1.8.4indirect
npmteex1.0.1indirect
npmtext-decoder1.1.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmto-through3.0.0indirect
npmtransfob1.0.0indirect
npmunc-path-regex0.1.2indirect
npmundertaker2.0.0indirect
npmundertaker-registry2.0.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmv8flags4.0.1indirect
npmvalue-or-function4.0.0indirect
npmvinyl3.0.0indirect
npmvinyl-contents2.0.0indirect
npmvinyl-fs4.0.0indirect
npmvinyl-sourcemap2.0.0indirect
npmvinyl-sourcemaps-apply0.2.1indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
NuGetdatatables.net3.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 160 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
micromatch4.0.7indirectmoderate14.0.8

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm, Packagist.