Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 08:51 UTC

DeliciousBuding / codex-browser-bridge

Expose Codex Desktop's Chrome browser bridge as an MCP server for Claude Code and other agents.

Rust · JavaScriptMIT★ 13 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMCP serverCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#agent#browser-automation#browser-bridge#cdp#chrome-devtools#chrome-extension#claude-code#codex#devtools-protocol#json-rpc#mcp#mcp-server#named-pipe#rust#windows

DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Delicious233Personal account
8 followers36 public repossince Mar 2022Hunan University

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@delicious233/codex-browser-bridge1.10.1849132 days agocodexchromemcpmcp-serverbrowserbrowser-automationclaude-codeagentautomationcdpdevtoolsdevtools-protocoljson-rpcnamed-piperust

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

58Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 169 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year169
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv1.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases4.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars13
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

49Weak
How it's scored
39.1/80Monthly downloads — 849 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@delicious233/codex-browser-bridge
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads849
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

17Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.97

Issue & PR responsiveness

41Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
18.3/30PR acceptance — 11/18 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.9/25Owner reach — 8 followers of DeliciousBuding
20.1/25Track record — 36 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginDeliciousBuding
public_repos36
account_age_days1,586
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@delicious233/codex-browser-bridge
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 15 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, browser-automation, browser-bridge, cdp, chrome-devtools, chrome-extension, claude-code, codex, devtools-protocol, json-rpc, mcp, mcp-server, named-pipe, rust, windows
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge
docs_sitehttps://github.com/DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.8

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, docs/archives/codex-browser-bridge-continuous-hardening/governance/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, docs/archives/codex-browser-bridge-continuous-hardening/governance/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,079
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

84Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/30 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes73,843
source_files_sampled30
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

13GitHub stars
3contributors
169commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'codex-browser-bridge' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 08:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.48Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.11Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8Cargo.toml
All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103direct
crates.iobase640.22.1direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.iotokio1.52.3direct
crates.iotoml0.8.23direct
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.23direct
crates.iouuid1.23.3direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioassert_cmd2.2.2indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobstr1.12.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.0indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.iocriterion0.5.1indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iodifflib0.4.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofloat-cmp0.10.0indirect
crates.iofutures0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.17indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.102indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomatchers0.2.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iomio1.2.1indirect
crates.ionormalize-line-endings0.3.0indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.4indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.10indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.13indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.9indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.4indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermtree0.5.1indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.9indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.11indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.22.27indirect
crates.iotoml_write0.1.2indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.125indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.102indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.15indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.52indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.52indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge. Read them side by side →

98ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcpChrome DevTools for coding agentsExceptional96alpic-ai/skybridgeSkybridge is a full-stack TypeScript framework for MCP Apps and ChatGPT Apps. Type-safe. React-powered. Platform-agnostic.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional96microsoft/agent-governance-toolkitAI Agent Governance Toolkit — Policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, execution sandboxing, and reliability engineering for autonomous AI agents. Covers 10/10 OWASP Agentic Top 10.Exceptional99modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdkThe official Rust SDK for the Model Context ProtocolExceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.