Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 05:04 UTC

DotNetNext / SqlSugar

.Net aot ORM SqlServer ORM Mongodb ORM MySql 瀚高 Postgresql ORM DB2 Hana 高斯 Duckdb C# VB.NET Sqlite ORM Oracle ORM Mysql Orm 虚谷数据库 达梦 ORM 人大金仓 ORM 神通ORM C# ORM , C# ORM .NET ORM NET9 ORM .NET8 ORM ClickHouse ORM QuestDb ,TDengine ORM,OceanBase ORM,GaussDB ORM,Tidb ORM Object/Relational Mapping

C#MIT★ 5,828 stars⑂ 1,389 forkssince Jul 2015View on GitHub ↗

DotNetNext/SqlSugar holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

果糖网Personal account
498 followers49 public repossince May 2015果糖大数据科技(南通)有限公司(永久免费开源)

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 8 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume440 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained29 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year440
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year40
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases97 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 417 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~63.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count97
latest_release_tag5.1.4.197
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release417
mean_days_between_releases63.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars5,828 stars
25/25Forks1,389 forks
13.4/15Watchers258 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,389
stars5,828
watchers258
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth70 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled70
top_contributor_share0.989
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
14/30PR acceptance101/216 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs101
open_issues11
closed_issues1,217
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.991
closed_unmerged_prs115
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
19.4/25Owner reach498 followers of DotNetNext
24.4/25Track record49 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers498
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginDotNetNext
public_repos49
account_age_days4,123
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.donet5.com/Home/Doc
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsorm, sqlsever, mysql, sqlite, oralce, postgresql, mongodb, clickhouse
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.donet5.com/Home/Doc
docs_sitehttps://www.donet5.com/Home/Doc
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained29 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages89
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 89 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.3/40Legible commit history10 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapSrc/Asp.Net/AccessTest/AccessTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/CustomDbTest/CustomDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/DmTest/DmTest.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsSrc/Asp.Net/AccessTest/AccessTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/CustomDbTest/CustomDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/DmTest/DmTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/ExtensionsDemo/ExtensionsDemo.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/Json2SqlTest/Json2SqlTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/KdbndpTest/KdbndpTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/MySqlConnectorTest/MySqlConnectorTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/MySqlTest/MySqlTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/NugetTest/NugetTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/OdbcTest/OdbcTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/OracleTest/OracleTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/PerformanceTest/PerformanceTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/PgSqlTest/PgSqlTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/QuestDbTest/QuestDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlServerTest/SqlServerTest.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar.Access/SqlSugar.Access.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar.DbFirstExtensions/SqlSugar.DbFirstExtensions.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar.Extensions.DataCache/SqlSugar.Extensions.DataCache.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar.MySqlConnector/SqlSugar.MySqlConnector.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar.Odbc/SqlSugar.Odbc.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqlSugar/SqlSugar.csproj, Src/Asp.Net/SqliteTest/SqliteTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/4TDSQLForOracleODBCTest/4TDSQLForOracleODBCTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/AccessTest/AccessTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/CacheTest/CacheTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/ClickHouseTest/ClickHouseTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/CustomDbTest/CustomDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/DB2CoreTest/DB2CoreTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/DbFirstRazorTest/DbFirstRazorTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/DmOrmTest/DmOrmTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/DorisTest/DorisTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/DuckDBTest/DuckDBTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/GaussTest/GaussDBTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/GbaseTest/GbaseTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/HANATest/HANATest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/HGTest/HGTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/Json2Sql/Json2Sql.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/KdbndpTest/KdbndpTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/MongoDb.Ado.data/MongoDb.Ado.data.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/MongoDbTest/MongoDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/MySqlConnectorTest/MySqlConnectorTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/MySqlTest/MySqlTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/Net7Test/NET7Test/NET7Test/NET7Test.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/NugetTest/NugetTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/OceanBaseForOracleTest/OceanBaseForOracleTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/OdbcTest/OdbcTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/OracleTest/OracleTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/OscarTest/OscarTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/PerformanceBenchmarks/PerformanceBenchmarks.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/PgSqlTest/PgSqlTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/QuestDbTest/QuestDbTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSeverTest/SqlSeverTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.AccessCore/SqlSugar.AccessCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.ClickHouseCore/SqlSugar.ClickHouseCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.Db2Core/SqlSugar.Db2Core.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.DuckDBCore/SqlSugar.DuckDBCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.GBaseCore/SqlSugar.GBaseCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.GaussCore/SqlSugar.GaussDBCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.HG/SqlSugar.HGCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.HanaConnector/SqlSugar.HanaConnector/SqlSugar.HanaConnector.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.MongoDbCore/SqlSugar.MongoDbCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.MySqlConnectorCore/SqlSugar.MySqlConnectorCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.OceanBaseForOracle/SqlSugar.OceanBaseForOracleCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.OdbcCore/SqlSugar.OdbcCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.QuestDb.RestApi/SqlSugar.QuestDb.RestAPI.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.TDSQLForOracleODBC/SqlSugar.TDSQLForOracleODBC.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.TDSQLForPGODBC/SqlSugar.TDSQLForPGODBC.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.TDengineCore/SqlSugar - Backup.TDengineCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.TDengineCore/SqlSugar.TDengineCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar.XuguCore/SqlSugar.XuguCore.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqlSugar/SqlSugar.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/SqliteTest/SqliteTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/TDSQLForPGOBDCTest/3TDSQLForPGOBDCTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/TDengine.Ado.Data/SqlSugar.TDengine/TDengine.Ado.Data.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/TDengineTest/1TDengineTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/VastbaseTest/2VastbaseTest.csproj, Src/Asp.NetCore2/XuGuTest/2XuGuTest.csproj, Src/OracleUS7ASCII/SqlSugar/SqlSugar.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes42/4,143 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes189,823
source_files_sampled4,143
oversized_source_files42

Key facts

5,828GitHub stars
70contributors
440commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
97releases
1bus factor
11open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,389 ⇿
0Stars
1,389Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,389132018-122022-102026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 6

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 05:03 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 89

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 89 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.12indirect
NuGetClickHouse.Client7.8.2indirect
NuGetCsvHelper31.0.2indirect
NuGetDapper1.50.4-alpha1-00070indirect
NuGetDapper2.1.35indirect
NuGetDapper.Contrib1.50.0indirect
NuGetDapper.Extension1.0.0.1indirect
NuGetdmdbms.DmProvider1.1.0.16649indirect
NuGetDuckDB.NET.Data.Full1.4.1indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.1.3indirect
NuGetFreeSql2.0.105indirect
NuGetFreeSql.Provider.SqlServer2.0.105indirect
NuGetGBase.DataProvider1.11indirect
NuGetGBase.DataProvider1.11.0indirect
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.19.4indirect
NuGetK4os.Compression.LZ41.2.6indirect
NuGetK4os.Compression.LZ4.Streams1.2.6indirect
NuGetK4os.Hash.xxHash1.0.6indirect
NuGetMapster7.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient5.2.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient5.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite10.0.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore6.0.25indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer6.0.25indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Abstractions5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory5.0.0indirect
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.3.0indirect
NuGetMySql.Data6.9.12indirect
NuGetMySql.Data8.0.31indirect
NuGetMySqlConnector1.2.0indirect
NuGetMySqlConnector1.2.1indirect
NuGetMySqlConnector2.2.2indirect
NuGetMySqlConnector2.2.5indirect
NuGetNet.IBM.Data.Db28.0.0.310indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.2indirect
NuGetNpgsql5.0.18indirect
NuGetOpenGauss_NET6.0.30indirect
NuGetOracle.ManagedDataAccess.Core23.8.0indirect
NuGetOscar.Data.SqlClient4.0.4indirect
NuGetPortable.BouncyCastle1.9.0indirect
NuGetRazorEngine3.10.0indirect
NuGetRazorEngine.NetCore3.1.0indirect
NuGetServiceStack.Common4.5.14indirect
NuGetServiceStack.Interfaces4.5.14indirect
NuGetServiceStack.Redis4.5.14indirect
NuGetServiceStack.Text4.5.14indirect
NuGetsqlSugar5.0.0.13indirect
NuGetSqlSugar.Nhgdb5.1.4.159indirect
NuGetSqlSugar.Nhgdb5.1.4.3indirect
NuGetSqlSugar.Odbc5.1.4.21indirect
NuGetSqlSugar.XuguClient3.3.4.8indirect
NuGetSqlSugarCore5.1.4.170indirect
NuGetSqlSugarCore5.1.4.93indirect
NuGetSqlSugarCore.Dm8.8.1indirect
NuGetSqlSugarCore.Dm8.8.2indirect
NuGetSqlSugarCore.Kdbndp9.3.8.413indirect
NuGetSyntacticSugar2.4.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.4.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Common4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Odbc10.0.8indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Odbc4.6indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Odbc4.6.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Odbc7.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.Odbc8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.OleDb6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.SqlClient4.8.6indirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt7.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.6.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Dynamic.Core1.6.0.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Emit.Lightweight4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystemCommon 8.5.0indirect
NuGetTDengine.Ado.Data1.4.0indirect
NuGetTDengine.Ado.Data3.1.7indirect
NuGetTDengine.Connector3.1indirect
NuGetTDengine.Connector3.1.0indirect
NuGetTDengine.Connector3.1.6indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 89 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
RazorEngine3.10.0indirectcritical1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.