Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 21:24 UTC

ErikEJ / EFCorePowerTools

Entity Framework Core Power Tools - reverse engineering, migrations and model visualization in Visual Studio & CLI

C#MIT★ 2,515 stars⑂ 336 forkssince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗

ErikEJ/EFCorePowerTools holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Security (60/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Erik Ejlskov JensenPersonal account
1,637 followers102 public repossince Apr 2013@delegateas

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 164 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year164
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 369 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~257.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagefcore6-eol
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release369
mean_days_between_releases257.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
55.2/60Stars — 2,515 stars
21/25Forks — 336 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 55 watchers
Inputs used
forks336
stars2,515
watchers55
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 61 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled61
top_contributor_share0.923
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 823/979 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs823
open_issues3
closed_issues2,494
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.999
closed_unmerged_prs156
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
23.1/25Owner reach — 1,637 followers of ErikEJ
25/25Track record — 102 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,637
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginErikEJ
public_repos102
account_age_days4,896
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsentity-framework-core, visual-studio, entity-framework, model-visualization, sql-server, hacktoberfest, dbcontext, dotnet, visual-studio-extension
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages92
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 92 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,095
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Core/DacFxStrongTypedCore.161/DacFxStrongTypedCore.161.csproj, src/Core/NUnitTestCore/NUnitTestCore.csproj, src/Core/NUnitTestCore100/NUnitTestCore100.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 28 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.28
toolchain_manifestssrc/Core/DacFxStrongTypedCore.161/DacFxStrongTypedCore.161.csproj, src/Core/NUnitTestCore/NUnitTestCore.csproj, src/Core/NUnitTestCore100/NUnitTestCore100.csproj, src/Core/RevEng.Core.100/RevEng.Core.100.csproj, src/Core/RevEng.Core.80/RevEng.Core.80.csproj, src/Core/RevEng.Core.90/RevEng.Core.90.csproj, src/Core/RevEng.Core.Abstractions/RevEng.Core.Abstractions.csproj, src/Core/SqlServer.Rules.Report/SqlServer.Rules.Report.csproj, src/Core/efcpt.10/efcpt.10.csproj, src/Core/efcpt.8/efcpt.8.csproj, src/Core/efcpt.9/efcpt.9.csproj, src/Core/efpt100.core/efpt100.core.csproj, src/Core/efpt80.core/efpt80.core.csproj, src/Core/efpt90.core/efpt90.core.csproj, src/Core/efreveng100/efreveng100.csproj, src/Core/efreveng80/efreveng80.csproj, src/Core/efreveng90/efreveng90.csproj, src/GUI/EFCorePowerTools/EFCorePowerTools.csproj, src/GUI/PowerToolsExtensionPack/PowerToolsExtensionPack.csproj, src/GUI/RevEng.Shared/RevEng.Common.csproj, src/GUI/UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj, src/GUI/WizardItemTemplate/WizardItemTemplate.csproj, src/Nupkg/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.8.SqlServer.Dacpac/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.8.SqlServer.Dacpac.csproj, src/Nupkg/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.9.SqlServer.Dacpac/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.9.SqlServer.Dacpac.csproj, src/Nupkg/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.DgmlBuilder/ErikEJ.EntityFrameworkCore.DgmlBuilder.csproj, test/EfPlayground/EfPlayground/EfPlayground.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/Chinook/ErikEJ.Dacpac.Chinook.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/DatabaseBuild/DatabaseBuild.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/DockerPlayground/DockerPlayground.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/MigrationsTest/MigrationsTest.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/PostgresTester/PostgresTester.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/ScaffoldingTester/ScaffoldingTester.csproj, test/ScaffoldingTester/ScaffoldingTester5/ScaffoldingTester5.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 6/610 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes851,852
source_files_sampled610
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,515GitHub stars
61contributors
164commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
3open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 336 ⇿
0Stars
336Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037533352018-052022-072026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 21:23 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAdysTech.CredentialManager2.6.0indirect
NuGetBen.Demystifier0.4.1indirect
NuGetBricelam.EntityFrameworkCore.Pluralizer1.0.0indirect
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1indirect
NuGetCommunity.VisualStudio.Toolkit.1717.0.533indirect
NuGetDapper2.1.72indirect
NuGetEfCore.SchemaCompare8.2.0indirect
NuGetEFCore.Snowflake8.0.8indirect
NuGetEFCore.Snowflake9.0.9indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Scaffolding.Handlebars10.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Scaffolding.Handlebars8.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Scaffolding.Handlebars9.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite.NodaTime10.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite.NodaTime8.0.1indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite.NodaTime9.2.1indirect
NuGetErikEJ.DacFX.SqlServer.Rules4.0.0indirect
NuGetErikEJ.DacFX.SqlServer.Rules5.1.2indirect
NuGetErikEJ.DacFX.TSQLSmellSCA4.0.0indirect
NuGetFirebirdSql.EntityFrameworkCore.Firebird11.0.0indirect
NuGetFirebirdSql.EntityFrameworkCore.Firebird12.0.0indirect
NuGetFirebirdSql.EntityFrameworkCore.Firebird13.0.0indirect
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2024.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.1.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.1.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design8.0.30indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.19indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite8.0.30indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite9.0.19indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer10.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.HierarchyId10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.HierarchyId10.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.HierarchyId8.0.30indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.HierarchyId9.0.19indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NetTopologySuite10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NetTopologySuite10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NetTopologySuite10.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NetTopologySuite8.0.30indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NetTopologySuite9.0.19indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools10.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.5.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.PowerPlatform.Dataverse.Client1.2.26indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SqlServer.DacFx170.4.83indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Data.Framework17.5.33428.388indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK17.0.32112.339indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.TemplateWizardInterface17.0.31902.203indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VSSDK.BuildTools17.14.2094indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf1.1.135indirect
NuGetMicroting.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql.NetTopologySuite10.0.10indirect
NuGetMono.TextTemplating3.0.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetMvvmLightLibs5.4.1.1indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL10.0.1indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NetTopologySuite10.0.3indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NetTopologySuite8.0.11indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NetTopologySuite9.0.4indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NodaTime10.0.3indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NodaTime8.0.11indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.NodaTime9.0.4indirect
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModel7.3.0indirect
NuGetNuGet.Protocol7.9.0indirect
NuGetNUnit4.3.2indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0indirect
NuGetOracle.EntityFrameworkCore8.23.26300indirect
NuGetOracle.EntityFrameworkCore9.23.26300indirect
NuGetOracle.EntityFrameworkCore.NetTopologySuite10.23.26200indirect
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql.NetTopologySuite8.0.3indirect
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql.NetTopologySuite9.0.0indirect
NuGetSimplerSoftware.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NodaTime10.0.1indirect
NuGetSimplerSoftware.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NodaTime8.0.1indirect
NuGetSimplerSoftware.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer.NodaTime9.1.1indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2indirect
NuGetSystem.CodeDom10.0.11indirect
NuGetSystem.CodeDom9.0.19indirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Composition9.0.19indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions22.2.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml10.0.11indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json9.0.19indirect
NuGetUnicodeInformation2.7.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 92 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.