Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:49 UTC
Eugeny / russh
Rust SSH client & server library
Eugeny/russh holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
84
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
EugenePersonal account
2,550 followers125 public repossince Dec 2009@elements-storage
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | russhpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.63.1 | 836,142 | 128 | 4 days ago | ssh |
| crates.io | pageantpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.2.2 | 371,749 | 11 | 10 days ago | — |
| crates.io | russh-cryptovecpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.62.0 | 879,116 | 19 | 56 days ago | — |
| crates.io | russh-utilpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.52.0 | 701,333 | 6 | 490 days ago | — |
| crates.io | russh-configpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.58.0 | 37,332 | 10 | 162 days ago | — |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
92
Development activity
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 4 days ago |
| 22.2/36 | Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 189 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 189 |
| human_commit_share | 0.92 |
| days_since_last_push | 4 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 32 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 78 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 4 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~5.4 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 78 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.63.1 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 4 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 5.4 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
68
Popularity & adoption
77Good
How it's scored
| 53/60 | Stars — 1,841 stars |
| 20.4/25 | Forks — 284 forks |
| 3.9/15 | Watchers — 6 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 284 |
| stars | 1,841 |
| watchers | 6 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
57Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 2 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | github.com, shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
59
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 8.8/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 61% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 98 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 98 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.61 |
How it's scored
| 33.6/42 | Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed |
| 25.8/30 | PR acceptance — 389/453 decided PRs merged |
| 5.8/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/9 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 1.5/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 389 |
| open_issues | 52 |
| closed_issues | 207 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 1 |
| prs_merged_30d | 9 |
| prs_decided_30d | 14 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.799 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 64 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 9 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 4 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 9 |
Ownership & stewardship
74Good
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 24.5/25 | Owner reach — 2,550 followers of Eugeny |
| 25/25 | Track record — 125 public repos, account ~16 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 2,550 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | Eugeny |
| public_repos | 125 |
| account_age_days | 6,111 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
76
Engineering practices
76Good
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 4 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — cryptovec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 12/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
75Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/russh |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 7 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | native, rust, ssh, ssh-client, ssh-client-library, ssh-server, ssh-server-library |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://docs.rs/russh |
| docs_site | https://docs.rs/russh |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
61
Security posture
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 1.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0.8/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 5/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 4/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 2/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 16 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 2 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
71Good
How it's scored
| 18.5/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: rsa 0.10.0-rc.18 (moderate 5.9) |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 34.9/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,009 days ago |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 1 |
| affected_packages | 1 |
| assessed_packages | 3 |
| unassessed_packages | 67 |
| affected_by_severity | moderate 1 |
| direct_affected_packages | 1 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 67 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
63
Agent context & guidance
23At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 22.6/40 | Legible commit history — 39 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.424 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, cryptovec/Cargo.toml, pageant/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — cryptovec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Rust (statically typed) |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 4/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0.02 |
| toolchain_manifests | Cargo.toml, cryptovec/Cargo.toml, pageant/Cargo.toml, russh-config/Cargo.toml, russh-util/Cargo.toml, russh/Cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed) |
| 52.7/55 | Manageable file sizes — 4/97 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Rust |
| largest_source_bytes | 98,341 |
| source_files_sampled | 97 |
| oversized_source_files | 4 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
1,841GitHub stars
98contributors
189commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
78releases
1bus factor
52open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 14 authors (cap 12)
- crates package 'russh' points at a different repository (https://github.com/warp-tech/russh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'pageant' points at a different repository (https://github.com/warp-tech/russh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'russh-cryptovec' points at a different repository (https://github.com/warp-tech/russh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'russh-util' points at a different repository (https://github.com/warp-tech/russh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'russh-config' points at a different repository (https://github.com/warp-tech/russh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 284 ⇿
0Stars
284Forks
77Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 24Patch 32
Each point covers 4 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 6 | CI-Tests | 6 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 1 | Code-Review | Found 5/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 8 | SAST | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 4 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 78
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | ssh-encoding | — | cryptovec/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | — | cryptovec/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | — | pageant/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures | — | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | globset | 0.4 | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | — | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | — | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | whoami | 1.2 | russh-config/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | russh-util/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aes | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-trait | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aws-lc-rs | 1.16.2 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bitflags | 2.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | block-padding | 0.4 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | byteorder | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | cbc | 0.2 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | cipher | 0.5.1 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ctr | 0.10 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | curve25519-dalek | 5 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | crypto-bigint | 0.7.3 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | data-encoding | 2.3 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | delegate | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | digest | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | der | 0.8 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | des | 0.9 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ecdsa | 0.17 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ed25519-dalek | 3 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | elliptic-curve | 0.14 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | enum_dispatch | 0.3.13 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | flate2 | 1.0.15 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | generic-array | 1.3.3 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | getrandom | 0.4 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ghash | 0.6.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hex-literal | 1 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hmac | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | inout | 0.2 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | keccak | 0.2.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | md5 | 0.8 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ml-kem | 0.3 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | module-lattice | 0.2 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | num-bigint | =0.5.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | num_bigint_0_4 | 0.4.6 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | p256 | 0.14 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | p384 | 0.14 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | p521 | 0.14 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pbkdf2 | 0.13 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pkcs1 | =0.8.0-rc.4 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pkcs5 | 0.8 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pkcs8 | 0.11 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | polyval | 0.7.1 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand_core | 0.10.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ring | 0.17.14 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rsa | =0.10.0-rc.18 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | russh-cryptovec | 0.62.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | russh-util | 0.52.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | salsa20 | 0.11.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | scrypt | 0.12.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sec1 | 0.8 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha1 | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha2 | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha3 | 0.12.0 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | signature | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | spki | 0.8 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ssh-encoding | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ssh-key | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | subtle | 2.4 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | typenum | 1.17 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | universal-hash | 0.6.1 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | yasna | 0.6 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | zeroize | 1.7 | russh/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | criterion | 0.7 | russh/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies 70
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 52 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | aws-lc-rs | — | direct |
| crates.io | bitflags | — | direct |
| crates.io | block-padding | — | direct |
| crates.io | cbc | — | direct |
| crates.io | cipher | — | direct |
| crates.io | criterion | — | direct |
| crates.io | crypto-bigint | — | direct |
| crates.io | ctr | — | direct |
| crates.io | curve25519-dalek | — | direct |
| crates.io | data-encoding | — | direct |
| crates.io | der | — | direct |
| crates.io | des | — | direct |
| crates.io | ecdsa | — | direct |
| crates.io | ed25519-dalek | — | direct |
| crates.io | elliptic-curve | — | direct |
| crates.io | enum_dispatch | — | direct |
| crates.io | flate2 | — | direct |
| crates.io | generic-array | — | direct |
| crates.io | getrandom | — | direct |
| crates.io | ghash | — | direct |
| crates.io | globset | — | direct |
| crates.io | hex-literal | — | direct |
| crates.io | inout | — | direct |
| crates.io | keccak | — | direct |
| crates.io | md5 | — | direct |
| crates.io | ml-kem | — | direct |
| crates.io | module-lattice | — | direct |
| crates.io | num-bigint | — | direct |
| crates.io | p256 | — | direct |
| crates.io | p384 | — | direct |
| crates.io | p521 | — | direct |
| crates.io | pbkdf2 | — | direct |
| crates.io | pkcs1 | 0.8.0-rc.4 | direct |
| crates.io | pkcs5 | — | direct |
| crates.io | pkcs8 | — | direct |
| crates.io | polyval | — | direct |
| crates.io | rand_core | — | direct |
| crates.io | ring | — | direct |
| crates.io | rsa | 0.10.0-rc.18 | direct |
| crates.io | russh-cryptovec | — | direct |
| crates.io | russh-util | — | direct |
| crates.io | salsa20 | — | direct |
| crates.io | scrypt | — | direct |
| crates.io | sec1 | — | direct |
| crates.io | sha3 | — | direct |
| crates.io | spki | — | direct |
| crates.io | subtle | — | direct |
| crates.io | typenum | — | direct |
| crates.io | universal-hash | — | direct |
| crates.io | whoami | — | direct |
| crates.io | yasna | — | direct |
| crates.io | zeroize | — | direct |
| crates.io | anyhow | — | indirect |
| crates.io | chrono | — | indirect |
| crates.io | clap | — | indirect |
| crates.io | internal-russh-num-bigint | 0.5.0 | indirect |
| crates.io | nix | — | indirect |
| crates.io | pageant | — | indirect |
| crates.io | ratatui | — | indirect |
| crates.io | russh-sftp | — | indirect |
| crates.io | shell-escape | — | indirect |
| crates.io | tempfile | — | indirect |
| crates.io | termion | — | indirect |
| crates.io | tokio-fd | — | indirect |
| crates.io | wasm-bindgen | — | indirect |
| crates.io | wasm-bindgen-futures | — | indirect |
| crates.io | wasm-bindgen-test | — | indirect |
| crates.io | windows | — | indirect |
| crates.io | windows-strings | — | indirect |
| crates.io | windows-sys | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 1
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 67 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rsa | 0.10.0-rc.18 | direct | moderate | 1 | — |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.