Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-08 21:26 UTC

EvotecIT / CodeGlyphX

CodeGlyphX is a fast, dependency-free toolkit for QR codes and barcodes, with robust decoding and a minimal API. It targets modern .NET as well as legacy .NET Framework, and includes renderers, payload helpers, and WPF controls.

C#Apache-2.0★ 43 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined

EvotecIT/CodeGlyphX holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EvotecOrganization · verified domain
655 followers134 public repossince Oct 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCodeGlyphX3.0.0-100 days agoqrrmqrbarcodedatamatrixpdf417aztecmaxicodedotcodehanxings1databardpmotppure-managed

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,480 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,480
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~29 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagCodeGlyphX-v3.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases29

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.3/60Stars — 43 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars43
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.4/80Total downloads — 45,533 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCodeGlyphX
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads45,533
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 267/276 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs267
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d26
prs_decided_7d26
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d39
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
20.3/25Owner reach — 655 followers of EvotecIT
25/25Track record — 134 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers655
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginEvotecIT
public_repos134
account_age_days3,997

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCodeGlyphX
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://codeglyphx.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscsharp, dotnet, powershell, qrcode, qrcode-generator, qrcode-reader
has_wikino
homepagehttp://codeglyphx.com/
docs_sitehttp://codeglyphx.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages15
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 15 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md, Website/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://codeglyphx.com/llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history — 46 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://codeglyphx.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.489
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md, Website/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,698
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Build/PackageConsumer/PackageConsumer.csproj, Build/SyntheticQrFixtures/SyntheticQrFixtures.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsBuild/PackageConsumer/PackageConsumer.csproj, Build/SyntheticQrFixtures/SyntheticQrFixtures.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj, CodeGlyphX.CatalogGenerator/CodeGlyphX.CatalogGenerator.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Demo.Wpf/CodeGlyphX.Demo.Wpf.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Examples/CodeGlyphX.Examples.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Fuzz/CodeGlyphX.Fuzz.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Playground/CodeGlyphX.Playground.csproj, CodeGlyphX.ScreenScan.Wpf/CodeGlyphX.ScreenScan.Wpf.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Website/CodeGlyphX.Website.csproj, CodeGlyphX.Wpf/CodeGlyphX.Wpf.csproj, CodeGlyphX/CodeGlyphX.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 11/1,055 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes158,782
source_files_sampled1,055
oversized_source_files11
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

43GitHub stars
2contributors
1,480commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-08 21:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetZXing.Net0.16.11CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetQRCoder1.7.0CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetBarcoder3.0.0CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks/CodeGlyphX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web10.0.12CodeGlyphX.Playground/CodeGlyphX.Playground.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.1CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.1.0CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0CodeGlyphX.Tests/CodeGlyphX.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly$(BlazorRuntimeVersion)CodeGlyphX.Website/CodeGlyphX.Website.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer$(BlazorRuntimeVersion)CodeGlyphX.Website/CodeGlyphX.Website.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3CodeGlyphX/CodeGlyphX.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.12CodeGlyphX/CodeGlyphX.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.401CodeGlyphX/CodeGlyphX.csproj
npmplaywright^1.63.0package.json
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 2 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmplaywright1.63.0direct
NuGetBarcoder3.0.0direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.401direct
NuGetQRCoder1.7.0direct
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages10.0.12direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0direct
NuGetZXing.Net0.16.11direct
npmplaywright-core1.63.0indirect
NuGetCodeGlyphX—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 15 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.