Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 14:24 UTC

EvotecIT / DnsClientX

DnsClientX is an async C# library for DNS over UDP, TCP, HTTPS (DoH), and TLS (DoT). It also has a PowerShell module that can be used to query DNS records. It provides a simple way to query DNS records using multiple DNS providers. It supports multiple DNS record types and parallel queries.

C#MIT★ 25 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗

EvotecIT/DnsClientX holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EvotecOrganization
633 followers124 public repossince Oct 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetDnsClientX1.0.8-2098 days agodnshttpsdns-over-httpsnet472netstandardnetstandard2.0net80net100

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume140 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year140
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases26 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~35.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagDnsClientX-v20260721142015
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases35.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars25 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars25
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.6/80Total downloads59,949 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDnsClientX
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads59,949
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.979
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance447/514 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs447
open_issues1
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs67
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
20.1/25Owner reach633 followers of EvotecIT
25/25Track record124 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers633
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginEvotecIT
public_repos124
account_age_days3,918
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 98 days ago
20/20Version history20 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDnsClientX
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish98

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://domaindetective.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdns, dnsclient, dns-over-https, dns-over-tcp, dns-over-tls, dns-over-udp
has_wikino
homepagehttps://domaindetective.dev
docs_sitehttps://domaindetective.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,853
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes2/493 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes88,756
source_files_sampled493
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

25GitHub stars
3contributors
140commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
26releases
1bus factor
1open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 25 ★ / 3 ⇿
25Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

051015202525362024-052025-062026-07

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 14:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
6SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8DnsClientX.Benchmarks/DnsClientX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetDnsClient1.8.0DnsClientX.Benchmarks/DnsClientX.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2DnsClientX.Examples/DnsClientX.Examples.csproj
NuGetMatejKafka.XmlDoc2CmdletDoc0.7.0DnsClientX.PowerShell/DnsClientX.PowerShell.csproj
NuGetPowerShellStandard.Library5.1.1DnsClientX.PowerShell/DnsClientX.PowerShell.csproj
NuGetSemanticComparison4.1.0DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.10DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.10DnsClientX.Tests/DnsClientX.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.10DnsClientX/DnsClientX.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.10DnsClientX/DnsClientX.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.10DnsClientX/DnsClientX.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.10DnsClientX/DnsClientX.csproj
All dependencies 12

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetDnsClient1.8.0direct
NuGetMatejKafka.XmlDoc2CmdletDoc0.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetPowerShellStandard.Library5.1.1direct
NuGetSemanticComparison4.1.0direct
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.10direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.