Public recordModerate
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 17:51 UTC
Finesssee / ProxyPilot
Windows-native CLIProxyAPI fork with TUI, system tray, and multi-provider OAuth for AI coding tools - No API key needed
Finesssee/ProxyPilot holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (77/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 119 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
63
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
NessZerraPersonal account
52 followers42 public repossince Sep 2021
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/router-for-me/CLIProxyAPI/v7points to another repo — not scored | v7.3.20 | - | 271 | 24 days ago | — |
| npm | proxypilot | 0.2.9 | 12 | 5 | 282 days ago | proxypilotclaudegeminicodexaicliproxyconfigswitcher |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
64
Development activity
53Moderate
How it's scored
| 9.9/36 | Push recency — last push 119 days ago |
| 24.9/36 | Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 3,288 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 3,288 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 119 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 36 |
Release discipline
81Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 80 releases published |
| 27/36 | Release recency — latest release 119 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~6.2 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 80 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.3.0-dev-0.69 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 119 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 6.2 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
52
Popularity & adoption
52Moderate
How it's scored
| 39.1/60 | Stars — 260 stars |
| 12.5/25 | Forks — 33 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 1 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 33 |
| stars | 260 |
| watchers | 1 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
77Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
19Critical
How it's scored
| 14.9/80 | Monthly downloads — 12 downloads/month across npm |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | proxypilot |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | npm |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 12 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
65
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 12.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 99 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 99 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.464 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 33/42 | Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed |
| 17.5/30 | PR acceptance — 7/12 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 7 |
| open_issues | 3 |
| closed_issues | 11 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.786 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 5 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
56Moderate
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 12.4/25 | Owner reach — 52 followers of Finesssee |
| 22.2/25 | Track record — 42 public repos, account ~5 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 52 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | Finesssee |
| public_repos | 42 |
| account_age_days | 1,873 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
91Excellent
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm |
| 26/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 282 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 5 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | proxypilot |
| ecosystems | npm |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 282 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
68
Engineering practices
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 10 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — eslint.config.js |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
75Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 6 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | claude-code, cli-proxy, codex, factory-droids, gemini, kiro |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
33
Security posture
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 94 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 3.3 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
77
Agent context & guidance
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, sdk/AGENTS.md, sdk/translator/AGENTS.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 92 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.92 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, sdk/AGENTS.md, sdk/translator/AGENTS.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 4,477 |
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — examples/plugin/Makefile, mise.toml |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — eslint.config.js |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — webui/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 4/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | examples/plugin/Makefile, mise.toml |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | webui/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0.02 |
| toolchain_manifests | examples/plugin/auth/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/auth/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/claude-web-search-router/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/cli/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/cli/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/codex-service-tier/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/executor/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/executor/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/frontend-auth-exclusive/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/frontend-auth/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/frontend-auth/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/host-callback-auth-files/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/host-callback/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/host-callback/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/host-model-callback/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/management-api/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/management-api/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/model/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/model/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/protocol-format/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/protocol-format/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/request-normalizer/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/request-normalizer/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/request-translator/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/request-translator/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/response-normalizer/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/response-normalizer/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/response-translator/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/response-translator/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/scheduler/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/simple/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/simple/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/thinking/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/thinking/rust/Cargo.toml, examples/plugin/usage/go/go.mod, examples/plugin/usage/rust/Cargo.toml, go.mod |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 54.1/55 | Manageable file sizes — 18/1,058 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 519,697 |
| source_files_sampled | 1,058 |
| oversized_source_files | 18 |
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) |
| 0/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | network-service |
Key facts
260GitHub stars
99contributors
3,288commits, last 12 months
119days since last push
80releases
2bus factor
3open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- go package 'github.com/router-for-me/CLIProxyAPI/v7' points at a different repository (https://github.com/router-for-me/CLIProxyAPI); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿
0Stars
33Forks
71Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 1Patch 5
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 11 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 94 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 51
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/andybalholm/brotli | v1.0.6 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/atotto/clipboard | v0.1.4 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles | v1.0.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea | v1.3.10 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss | v1.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify | v1.9.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/getlantern/systray | v1.2.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gin-gonic/gin | v1.10.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-git/go-git/v6 | v6.0.0-20251009132922-75a182125145 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/google/uuid | v1.6.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gorilla/websocket | v1.5.3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 | v5.9.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/jchv/go-webview2 | v0.0.0-20260205173254-56598839c808 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/joho/godotenv | v1.5.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/klauspost/compress | v1.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/minio/minio-go/v7 | v7.0.66 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pkg/browser | v0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141c | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/prometheus/client_golang | v1.23.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/redis/go-redis/v9 | v9.19.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/refraction-networking/utls | v1.8.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/sirupsen/logrus | v1.9.3 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/stretchr/testify | v1.11.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tidwall/gjson | v1.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tidwall/sjson | v1.2.5 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tiktoken-go/tokenizer | v0.7.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/crypto | v0.45.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/net | v0.47.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/oauth2 | v0.30.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sync | v0.18.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sys | v0.38.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.37.0 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2 | v2.2.1 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto | v1.3.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2 | v2.2.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pierrec/xxHash | v0.1.5 | go.mod |
| Go | google.golang.org/protobuf | v1.36.8 | go.mod |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-label | ^2.1.8 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-progress | ^1.1.8 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-separator | ^1.1.8 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-slot | ^1.2.4 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-switch | ^1.2.6 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tabs | ^1.1.13 | webui/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tooltip | ^1.2.8 | webui/package.json |
| npm | class-variance-authority | ^0.7.1 | webui/package.json |
| npm | clsx | ^2.1.1 | webui/package.json |
| npm | lucide-react | ^0.562.0 | webui/package.json |
| npm | react | ^19.2.0 | webui/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^19.2.0 | webui/package.json |
| npm | sonner | ^2.0.7 | webui/package.json |
| npm | tailwind-merge | ^3.4.0 | webui/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.