Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 04:36 UTC

Flux-Frontiers / KG_utils

Utility classes for the KGRAG system

PythonCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

Flux-Frontiers/KG_utils holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Flux-FrontiersOrganization
10 followers25 public repossince Sep 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIkgmodule-utils0.27.13,397462 days agoknowledge-graphkgmodulesdktypessnapshots

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 208 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year208
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv0.27.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases4.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.1/80Monthly downloads — 3,397 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageskgmodule-utils
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,397
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.716

Issue & PR responsiveness

34At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 42/42 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach — 10 followers of Flux-Frontiers
14.6/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginFlux-Frontiers
public_repos25
account_age_days781

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 46 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageskgmodule-utils
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories30
affected_packages2
assessed_packages170
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 170 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/kg_utils/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 71 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/kg_utils/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.71
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/kg_utils/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/80 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes53,767
source_files_sampled80
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
208commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
38releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 04:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 170 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.0indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.3.1indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.6.0indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit13.0.3indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcyclopts4.22.5indirect
PyPIdeprecation2.1.0indirect
PyPIdetect-secrets1.5.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIfirecrawl-anydoc0.1.9indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.7.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-transfer0.1.9indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.15.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx22.15.1indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.27.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipython9.16.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonpickle4.1.2indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlance-namespace0.9.0indirect
PyPIlance-namespace-urllib3-client0.9.0indirect
PyPIlancedb0.37.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImflux0.18.1indirect
PyPImlx0.31.1indirect
PyPImlx-cuda-130.31.1indirect
PyPImlx-metal0.31.1indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.24.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas13.1.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti13.0.85indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime13.0.96indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu139.20.0.48indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft12.0.0.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile1.15.1.6indirect
PyPInvidia-curand10.4.0.35indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver12.0.4.66indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse12.6.3.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu130.8.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.29.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink13.3.33indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu133.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx13.0.85indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.31.0indirect
PyPIopenai3.0.0indirect
PyPIopencv-python4.14.0.94indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpiexif1.1.3indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.2indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpooch1.9.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymupdf2.0indirect
PyPIpymupdf-layout2.0indirect
PyPIpymupdf4llm2.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyqt55.15.11indirect
PyPIpyqt5-qt55.15.19indirect
PyPIpyqt5-sip12.19.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.4indirect
PyPIpyvis0.3.2indirect
PyPIpyvista0.48.4indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIquiltwright0.16.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.4indirect
PyPIrich-rst2.1.0indirect
PyPIruff0.15.22indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.9.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.0indirect
PyPIscooby0.11.2indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers5.7.0indirect
PyPIsentencepiece0.2.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlite-vec0.1.9indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItorch2.13.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItransformers5.15.0indirect
PyPItriton3.7.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPIty0.0.71indirect
PyPItyper0.27.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.14.11indirect
PyPIvtk9.6.2indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 170 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pillow12.3.0indirectcritical2813.0.0
certifi2026.7.22indirecthigh22026.10.19

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Flux-Frontiers/KG_utils. Read them side by side →

100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional99python/mypyOptional static typing for PythonExceptional99microsoft/agent-frameworkA framework for building, orchestrating and deploying AI agents and multi-agent workflows with support for Python and .NET.Exceptional99apache/supersetApache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration PlatformExceptional99Qiskit/qiskitQiskit is an open-source SDK for working with quantum computers at the level of extended quantum circuits, operators, and primitives.Exceptional99quantumlib/CirqPython framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.