Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 05:42 UTC

GridTools / gt4py

Python library for generating high-performance implementations of stencil kernels for weather and climate modeling from a domain-specific language (DSL).

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 147 stars⑂ 59 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

GridTools/gt4py holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GridToolsOrganization
21 followers24 public repossince Apr 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIgt4py1.2.213,607279 days agogridtoolsstencilweatherclimateperformanceportablehpc

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 425 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year425
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 28 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv1.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases20.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.1/60Stars — 147 stars
14.7/25Forks — 59 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks59
stars147
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
55.1/80Monthly downloads — 13,607 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgt4py
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads13,607
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 32 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled32
top_contributor_share0.177
How it's scored
29.7/42Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
25.1/30PR acceptance — 1,941/2,322 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs1,941
open_issues130
closed_issues315
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d46
prs_decided_30d59
issue_closed_ratio0.708
closed_unmerged_prs381
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.7/25Owner reach — 21 followers of GridTools
22.2/25Track record — 24 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginGridTools
public_repos24
account_age_days3,795

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgt4py
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://GridTools.github.io/gt4py
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://GridTools.github.io/gt4py
docs_sitehttps://GridTools.github.io/gt4py
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages54
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:gt4py@1.2.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 54 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/gt4py/next/AGENTS.md, src/gt4py/next/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/gt4py/next/AGENTS.md, src/gt4py/next/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,839
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/user/cartesian/Makefile, noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/gt4py/py.typed, typing_tests/mypy.ini
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/user/cartesian/Makefile, noxfile.py
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/gt4py/py.typed, typing_tests/mypy.ini
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/gt4py/py.typed, typing_tests/mypy.ini)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 14/731 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes106,315
source_files_sampled731
oversized_source_files14
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

147GitHub stars
32contributors
425commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
28releases
4bus factor
130open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 59 ⇿
0Stars
59Forks
28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605232019-112023-042026-09
Major 1Minor 3Patch 24

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 05:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIattrs>=21.3pyproject.toml
PyPIarray-api-compat>=1.13pyproject.toml
PyPIblack>=25.11pyproject.toml
PyPIboltons>=20.1pyproject.toml
PyPIcached-property>=1.5.1pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcmake>=3.22pyproject.toml
PyPIcytoolz>=1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdace>=2.0.0a7,<2.0.0a8pyproject.toml
PyPIdeepdiff>=8.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdevtools>=0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIfactory-boy>=3.3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIfilelock>=3.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfrozendict>=2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIgridtools-cpp>=2.3.9,==2.*pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlark>=1.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPImako>=1.3pyproject.toml
PyPInanobind>=1.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIninja>=1.11pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIordered-set>=4.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpybind11>=3.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIsetuptools>=77.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate>=0.8.10pyproject.toml
PyPItoolz>=0.12.1pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIversioningit>=3.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIxxhash>=3.5.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 228

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 198 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIarray-api-compat1.15.0direct
PyPIattrs26.1.0direct
PyPIblack26.5.1direct
PyPIboltons26.1.0direct
PyPIcached-property2.0.1direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIcmake4.4.2direct
PyPIcytoolz1.1.0direct
PyPIdace2.0.0a7direct
PyPIdeepdiff9.1.0direct
PyPIdevtools0.12.2direct
PyPIfactory-boy3.3.3direct
PyPIfilelock3.32.2direct
PyPIfrozendict2.4.7direct
PyPIgridtools-cpp2.3.9direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIlark1.3.1direct
PyPImako1.3.12direct
PyPInanobind2.13.0direct
PyPIninja1.13.0direct
PyPInumpy2.5.1direct
PyPIordered-set4.1.0direct
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPIpybind113.0.4direct
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0direct
PyPItabulate0.10.0direct
PyPItoolz1.1.0direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIversioningit3.3.0direct
PyPIxxhash3.8.1direct
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIapeye1.4.1indirect
PyPIapeye-core1.1.5indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasttokens2.4.1indirect
PyPIastunparse1.6.3indirect
PyPIatlas4py0.41.1.dev4indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.15indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIcachebox5.2.3indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclang-format22.1.8indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.12.0indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.3indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.6.0indirect
PyPIcupy13.6.0indirect
PyPIcupy-cuda12x14.1.1indirect
PyPIcupy-cuda13x14.1.1indirect
PyPIcupy-rocm-7-014.1.1indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcython3.2.9indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdict2css0.6.0indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools3.10.0indirect
PyPIesbonio2.1.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfaker40.36.0indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.1indirect
PyPIfastrlock0.8.3indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfparser0.2.4indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.57indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhumanize4.16.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.165.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.3.0indirect
PyPIipython9.16.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjax0.11.0indirect
PyPIjax-cuda12-pjrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIjax-cuda12-plugin0.11.0indirect
PyPIjax-cuda13-pjrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIjax-cuda13-plugin0.11.0indirect
PyPIjaxlib0.11.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.5indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlsprotocol2025.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInbmake1.5.5indirect
PyPInest-asyncio21.7.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.5indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInox2026.7.11indirect
PyPInvtx0.2.15indirect
PyPIobjprint0.3.0indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.4.0indirect
PyPIorderly-set5.5.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIpip26.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydot4.0.1indirect
PyPIpygls2.1.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyreadline2.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cache1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-factoryboy2.8.1indirect
PyPIpytest-instafail0.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mypy-plugins4.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.1indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman5.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.1indirect
PyPIscikit-build0.19.1indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.1indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-jinja2-compat0.4.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.10.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-toolbox4.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstandard-imghdr3.10.14indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItach0.35.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.7indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItyper0.27.1indirect
PyPItypes-decorator5.2.0.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-docutils0.22.3.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-pytz2026.3.1.20260727indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-six1.17.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-tabulate0.10.0.20260508indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvalidate-pyproject0.25indirect
PyPIvalidate-pyproject-schema-store2026.8.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.1indirect
PyPIviztracer1.1.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.0.1indirect
PyPIwheel0.47.0indirect
PyPIxarray2026.7.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:gt4py@1.2.2 pulls in 54 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.