Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 16:28 UTC

Haidra-Org / horde-sdk

A python library to interact with AI-Horde's free generative AI APIs

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 44 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗

#ai #generative-ai #llm #python #stable-diffusion #ai-horde

Haidra-Org/horde-sdk holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (91/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HaidraOrganization

246 followers35 public repossince May 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	horde_sdk	0.33.1	3,345	113	0 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36	Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
17.9/18	Commit volume — 98 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	98
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	22

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~7.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.33.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	7.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

26.5/60	Stars — 44 stars
10/25	Forks — 17 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	17
stars	44
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, readthedocs.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate

How it's scored

47/80	Monthly downloads — 3,345 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	horde_sdk
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,345
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.975

Issue & PR responsiveness

45Weak

How it's scored

23.6/42	Issue resolution — 56% of issues closed
15.4/30	PR acceptance — 168/328 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	168
open_issues	7
closed_issues	9
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.562
closed_unmerged_prs	160
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
17.2/25	Owner reach — 246 followers of Haidra-Org
18.2/25	Track record — 35 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	246
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	Haidra-Org
public_repos	35
account_age_days	1,258

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 113 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	horde_sdk
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

91Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://aihorde.net/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai, generative-ai, llm, python, stable-diffusion, ai-horde
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://aihorde.net/
docs_site	https://aihorde.net/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

72Good

How it's scored

14.3/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: certifi 2026.10.18 (high 7.4)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	140
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 140 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.98
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

59Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — horde_sdk/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	horde_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (horde_sdk/py.typed)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/241 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	95,692
source_files_sampled	241
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — codegen/ai_horde/swagger.json, tests/test_data/ai_horde_api/swagger.json
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	codegen/ai_horde/swagger.json, tests/test_data/ai_horde_api/swagger.json
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

44GitHub stars

3contributors

98commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

7open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:horde_sdk@0.33.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 17 ⇿

0Stars

17Forks

94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 23Patch 70

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10

6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 16:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10	SAST	SAST tool detected: CodeQL
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 13

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	aiodns	`>=3.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiofiles	`>=24.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiohttp	`>=3.11.13`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	certifi	`>=2025.1.31`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	horde-model-reference	`>=8.4.0,<9.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	logfire	`>=3.7.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	loguru	`>=0.7.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	networkx	`>=3.4.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pillow	`>=11.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.10.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dotenv	`>=1.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	strenum	`>=0.4.15`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 140

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 127 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	aiodns	`4.0.4`	direct
PyPI	aiofiles	`25.1.0`	direct
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.5`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2026.10.18`	direct
PyPI	horde-model-reference	`8.6.2`	direct
PyPI	logfire	`5.2.0`	direct
PyPI	loguru	`0.7.3`	direct
PyPI	networkx	`3.7`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`13.0.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.14.1`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.4`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	strenum	`0.4.15`	direct
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	argcomplete	`3.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	boolean-py	`5.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.2`	indirect
PyPI	datamodel-code-generator	`0.86.0`	indirect
PyPI	deepmerge	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`4.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	genson	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	gevent	`26.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.75.5`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.6`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	haidra-core	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.20`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.20`	indirect
PyPI	inflect	`7.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	license-expression	`30.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.11.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`1.0.8`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`2.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-http-transport	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-common	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-aiohttp-client	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-instrumentation-requests	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-util-http	`0.66b1`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycares	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.50.1`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydot	`4.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`12.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.17.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	tach	`0.35.3`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	typeguard	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-aiofiles	`25.1.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-networkx	`3.6.1.20261018`	indirect
PyPI	types-pillow	`10.2.0.20240822`	indirect
PyPI	types-pytz	`2026.5.0.20261006`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260906`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20261006`	indirect
PyPI	types-setuptools	`84.0.0.20261006`	indirect
PyPI	types-urllib3	`1.26.25.14`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	ujson	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.14.11`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	win32-setctime	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	zensical	`0.0.51`	indirect
PyPI	zope-event	`6.2`	indirect
PyPI	zope-interface	`8.7`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 140 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
certifi	`2026.10.18`	direct	high	2	`2026.10.19`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records