Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-12 20:28 UTC

JedWatson / classnames

A simple javascript utility for conditionally joining classNames together

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 17,789 stars⑂ 558 forkssince Nov 2014View on GitHub ↗

JedWatson/classnames holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (30/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jed WatsonPersonal account

4,673 followers100 public repossince Jun 2011Thinkmill

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	classnames	2.5.1	124,098,347	30	957 days ago	react css classes classname classnames util utility

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
18/36	Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
14.2/18	Commit volume — 37 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	37
human_commit_share	0.03
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	26

Release discipline

32At Risk

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 26 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36	Release recency — latest release 946 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~311.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	26
latest_release_tag	v2.5.2
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	946
mean_days_between_releases	311.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

94Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 17,789 stars
22.9/25	Forks — 558 forks
11.4/15	Watchers — 115 watchers

Inputs used

forks	558
stars	17,789
watchers	115
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 124,098,347 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	classnames
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	124,098,347
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 43 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	43
top_contributor_share	0.408

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent

How it's scored

41/42	Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
20.8/30	PR acceptance — 268/387 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	268
open_issues	4
closed_issues	172
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.977
closed_unmerged_prs	119
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25	Owner reach — 4,673 followers of JedWatson
25/25	Track record — 100 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	4,673
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	JedWatson
public_repos	100
account_age_days	5,528

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 957 days ago
20/20	Version history — 30 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	classnames
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	957

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	5
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	211
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 211 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 97 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.97

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/15 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	4,421
source_files_sampled	15
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

17,789GitHub stars

43contributors

37commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

26releases

2bus factor

4open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 558 ⇿

0Stars

558Forks

26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 5Patch 20

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-12 20:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 211

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 211 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.23.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.22.20`	indirect
npm	@babel/highlight	`7.23.4`	indirect
npm	@jest/schemas	`29.6.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-commonjs	`29.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-json	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-node-resolve	`16.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	@sinclair/typebox	`0.27.8`	indirect
npm	@tsd/typescript	`5.4.3`	indirect
npm	@types/eslint	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/minimist	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	@types/normalize-package-data	`2.4.4`	indirect
npm	@types/resolve	`1.20.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	array-union	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	arrify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	async	`2.6.4`	indirect
npm	basic-auth	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase-keys	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	classnames	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commondir	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	corser	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	decamelize-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	diff-sequences	`29.6.3`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	eslint-formatter-pretty	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-rule-docs	`1.1.235`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	eventemitter3	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globby	`11.1.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	hard-rejection	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.8.9`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy	`1.18.1`	indirect
npm	http-server	`14.1.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	irregular-plurals	`3.5.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.13.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-module	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-reference	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-unicode-supported	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	jest-diff	`29.7.0`	indirect
npm	jest-get-type	`29.6.3`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.18.1`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.5`	indirect
npm	map-obj	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	map-obj	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	markdown-table	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	meow	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	min-indent	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minimist-options	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	opener	`1.5.2`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	plur	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	portfinder	`1.0.32`	indirect
npm	pretty-format	`29.7.0`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.2`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	quick-lru	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	react-is	`18.2.0`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	read-pkg-up	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	redent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	requires-port	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.8`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.62.4`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	secure-compare	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.5.4`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	slash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.16`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-hyperlinks	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	trim-newlines	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	tsd	`0.31.2`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.18.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.21.3`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	union	`0.5.0`	indirect
npm	url-join	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`20.2.9`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 211 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
picomatch	`4.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.0.8`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records