Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-30 05:06 UTC

JosephLenton / axum-test

Easy E2E testing for Axum

RustMIT★ 270 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

JosephLenton/axum-test holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (36/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joseph LentonPersonal account
52 followers64 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioaxum-test21.1.01,237,6791055 days agoaxumtesttesting

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

71Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
15.2/18Commit volume — 48 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year48
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 177 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tag19.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release177
mean_days_between_releases5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

52Moderate
How it's scored
39.4/60Stars — 270 stars
12.2/25Forks — 30 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars270
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,237,679 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaxum-test
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads13,358,627
monthly_downloads1,237,679
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.893

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent
How it's scored
38/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance — 165/171 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs165
open_issues4
closed_issues38
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.905
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.4/25Owner reach — 52 followers of JosephLenton
25/25Track record — 64 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers52
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginJosephLenton
public_repos64
account_age_days5,478
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 105 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaxum-test
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

36Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/axum-test
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.rs/axum-test
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/axum-test
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,416

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/70 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes98,295
source_files_sampled70
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

270GitHub stars
20contributors
48commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
4open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿
0Stars
30Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025303032023-062025-012026-08
Major 1Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-30 05:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained6 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioaxum0.8.9Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.12.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobytesize2.4.0Cargo.toml
crates.iocookie0.18.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioeduce0.7.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioexpect-json1.11.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1.5.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1.5Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util0.1.20Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1.10.1Cargo.toml
crates.iomime0.3.17Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-multipart-rfc7578_20.9.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioreserve-port2.5.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.229Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.53.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5.3Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.8Cargo.toml
crates.iopretty_assertions1.4.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9.34Cargo.toml
crates.iormp-serde1.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum-extra0.12.6Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.24.1Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.23.1Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.30.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioactix-web4.14.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioassert-json-diff2.0.2Cargo.toml
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioactix-web—direct
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioassert-json-diff—direct
crates.ioaxum—direct
crates.ioaxum-extra—direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobytes—direct
crates.iobytesize—direct
crates.iocookie—direct
crates.ioeduce—direct
crates.ioexpect-json—direct
crates.iofutures-util—direct
crates.iohttp—direct
crates.iohttp-body-util—direct
crates.iohyper—direct
crates.iohyper-util—direct
crates.iomime—direct
crates.iopretty_assertions—direct
crates.ioreqwest—direct
crates.ioreserve-port—direct
crates.iormp-serde—direct
crates.iorust-multipart-rfc7578_2—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.ioserde_urlencoded—direct
crates.ioserde_yaml—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotokio-tungstenite—direct
crates.iotower—direct
crates.iourl—direct
crates.iouuid—direct
crates.ioactix-ws—indirect
crates.ioaxum-msgpack—indirect
crates.ioaxum-yaml—indirect
crates.iofutures—indirect
crates.ioinsta—indirect
crates.iorand—indirect
crates.ioregex—indirect
crates.ioserde-email—indirect
crates.iotower-http—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with JosephLenton/axum-test. Read them side by side →

99microsoft/playwrightPlaywright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API. Exceptional98pytest-dev/pytestThe pytest framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testingExceptional98microsoft/react-native-test-appreact-native-test-app provides an app for all supported platforms as a packageExceptional97microsoft/testfxThis repository holds the source code of Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), a lightweight alternative to VSTest, as well as MSTest adapter and framework.Exceptional96mochajs/mocha☕️ Classic, reliable, trusted test framework for Node.js and the browserExceptional96cypress-io/cypressFast, easy and reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.