Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 01:49 UTC

K-and-R / email_validator

An email validator for Rails.

RubyMIT★ 656 stars⑂ 62 forkssince Aug 2010View on GitHub ↗

K-and-R/email_validator holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (68/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 1105 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

K&R SoftwareOrganization

0 followers33 public repossince Nov 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	email_validator	1.0.0	16	1	3514 days ago	email validate regex useful
RubyGems	email_validator	2.2.4	-	19	1350 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 1380 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 1,105 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.93
days_since_last_push	1,105
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

32At Risk

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 21 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36	Release recency — latest release 1,350 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~149.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	21
latest_release_tag	v2.2.4
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	1,350
mean_days_between_releases	149.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good

How it's scored

45.7/60	Stars — 656 stars
14.9/25	Forks — 62 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	62
stars	656
watchers	11
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

98Exceptional

How it's scored

78.5/80	Total downloads — 35,689,850 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	email_validator
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	35,689,850
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	email_validator

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	17
top_contributor_share	0.526

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

36.9/42	Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
20.2/30	PR acceptance — 35/52 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	35
open_issues	5
closed_issues	36
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.878
closed_unmerged_prs	17
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
0/25	Owner reach — 0 followers of K-and-R
23.2/25	Track record — 33 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	0
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	K-and-R
public_repos	33
account_age_days	5,354

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, rubygems
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,350 days ago
20/20	Version history — 19 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	email_validator, email_validator
ecosystems	npm, rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,350

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

46Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 32 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	3.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	34
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	217
unassessed_packages	12
affected_by_severity	high 11, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 217 resolved dependencies against OSV. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

16Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.1/40	Legible commit history — 28 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.301
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/6 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	39,507
source_files_sampled	6
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

656GitHub stars

17contributors

0commits, last 12 months

1,105days since last push

21releases

1bus factor

5open issues

npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 656 ★ / 62 ⇿

656Stars

62Forks

21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 10Patch 9

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10

3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 01:48 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	32 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	rake	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	rspec	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	pry	`—`	Gemfile
RubyGems	simplecov	`>= 0.17.0`	Gemfile

All dependencies 229

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 225 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	pry	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rake	`—`	direct
RubyGems	rspec	`—`	direct
RubyGems	simplecov	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.10.4`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.10.4`	indirect
npm	@babel/highlight	`7.10.4`	indirect
npm	@types/normalize-package-data	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	any-observable	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	app-root-path	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	async	`1.5.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	caller-callsite	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	caller-path	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	callsites	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	chalk	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	chownr	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ci-info	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cli-cursor	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cli-spinners	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	cli-truncate	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	cliui	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	code-point-at	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`6.0.5`	indirect
npm	date-fns	`1.30.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	dedent	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	deep-extend	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	deep-extend	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	editorconfig-checker	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	elegant-spinner	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	end-of-stream	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	entities	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	execa	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	execa	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	exit-hook	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	figures	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	find-parent-dir	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs-minipass	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	get-own-enumerable-property-symbols	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	get-stdin	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-stdin	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.6`	indirect
npm	graceful-readlink	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-ansi	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.8.9`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	husky	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	invert-kv	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-ci	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	is-directory	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-finite	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-obj	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-observable	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	is-regexp	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-stream	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jest-get-type	`21.2.0`	indirect
npm	jest-validate	`21.2.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.14.1`	indirect
npm	json-parse-better-errors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	lcid	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	leprechaun	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	leven	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	linkify-it	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	lint-staged	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	listr	`0.13.0`	indirect
npm	listr-silent-renderer	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	listr-update-renderer	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	listr-verbose-renderer	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash.differencewith	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.flatten	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.snakecase	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	log-symbols	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	log-update	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	markdown-it	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	markdownlint	`0.16.0`	indirect
npm	markdownlint-cli	`0.18.0`	indirect
npm	mdurl	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	minipass	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nconf	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	nice-try	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	node-fetch	`2.6.7`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	npm-path	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	npm-run-path	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	npm-which	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	number-is-nan	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	onetime	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	ora	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	os-locale	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	p-finally	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-map	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-is-inside	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-key	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	pify	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-dir	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	please-upgrade-node	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`1.19.1`	indirect
npm	pretty-format	`21.2.1`	indirect
npm	pseudomap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	pump	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	rc	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	repeating	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.19.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	restore-cursor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	run-node	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	rxjs	`5.5.12`	indirect
npm	secure-keys	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.1`	indirect
npm	semver-compare	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	slash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	staged-git-files	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	stream-to-observable	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	stringify-object	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-eof	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-observable	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	symbol-observable	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tar	`6.1.11`	indirect
npm	tr46	`0.0.3`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	uc.micro	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	window-size	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	yallist	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yaml-lint	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	yargs	`3.32.0`	indirect
RubyGems	activemodel	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kandr-pry-plus	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	mdl	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	pry-rails	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-performance	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rake	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 217 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
ansi-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`6.0.1`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.7`
cross-spawn	`5.1.0`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
cross-spawn	`6.0.5`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
js-yaml	`3.14.1`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.0`
linkify-it	`2.2.0`	indirect	high	2	`5.0.2`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect	high	4	`10.2.3`
nconf	`0.10.0`	indirect	high	1	`0.11.4`
semver	`5.7.1`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
tar	`6.1.11`	indirect	high	12	`7.5.19`
markdown-it	`9.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`14.2.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records