Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 02:47 UTC

Kephson / paste_reference

Paste reference instead of copy for content elements in TYPO3

JavaScript · PHP · ShellMIT★ 19 stars⑂ 28 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

Kephson/paste_reference holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (49/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ephraim HärerPersonal account

17 followers47 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	ehaerer/paste-reference	5.0.0	14,942	23	85 days ago	typo3-cms content-element references copy-paste

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

65Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 9 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 106 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	106
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	9
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 85 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~63.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	24
latest_release_tag	4.0.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	85
mean_days_between_releases	63.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

37Weak

How it's scored

20.4/60	Stars — 19 stars
11.9/25	Forks — 28 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	28
stars	19
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate

How it's scored

55.7/80	Monthly downloads — 14,942 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	ehaerer/paste-reference
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	398,613
monthly_downloads	14,942
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	14
top_contributor_share	0.89

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good

How it's scored

38.8/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
18.7/30	PR acceptance — 33/53 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	33
open_issues	4
closed_issues	48
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.923
closed_unmerged_prs	20
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9/25	Owner reach — 17 followers of Kephson
24.2/25	Track record — 47 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	17
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	Kephson
public_repos	47
account_age_days	5,055

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 85 days ago
20/20	Version history — 23 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	ehaerer/paste-reference
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	85

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	hacktoberfest, extension
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
2/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	149
unassessed_packages	35
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 149 resolved dependencies against OSV. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
9.1/40	Legible commit history — 17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.17
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/54 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	26,832
source_files_sampled	54
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars

14contributors

106commits, last 12 months

9days since last push

24releases

1bus factor

4open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'paste-reference-container-tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 28 ⇿

0Stars

28Forks

20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 0Patch 16

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 02:47 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
4	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7	Vulnerabilities	3 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	typo3/cms-backend	`^14.3`	composer.json
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`^14.3`	composer.json

All dependencies 184

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 182 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	typo3/cms-backend	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`—`	direct
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@asamuzakjp/dom-selector	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.139.0`	indirect
npm	@polka/url	`1.0.0-next.29`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@standard-schema/spec	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/ui	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	bidi-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`23.2.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.0.30`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	mrmime	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.18`	indirect
npm	psl	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	querystringify	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	requires-port	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	sirv	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	totalist	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`4.1.4`	indirect
npm	tr46	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	universalify	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	url-parse	`1.5.10`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`4.1.10`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	b13/container	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ergebnis/composer-normalize	`—`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-adminpanel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-belog	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-beuser	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-dashboard	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-extbase	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-extensionmanager	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-filelist	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-fluid	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-fluid-styled-content	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-form	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-frontend	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-info	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-install	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-lowlevel	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-opendocs	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-recycler	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-redirects	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-reports	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-rte-ckeditor	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-scheduler	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-seo	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-setup	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-styleguide	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-tstemplate	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-viewpage	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/cms-workspaces	`—`	indirect
Packagist	typo3/testing-framework	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 149 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
@vitest/mocker	`4.1.10`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`
postcss	`8.5.18`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.5.23`
vitest	`4.1.10`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records