Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 10:47 UTC

Krypton-Suite / Extended-Toolkit

A companion toolkit for the standard toolkit.

C#MIT★ 264 stars⑂ 41 forkssince Feb 2020View on GitHub ↗

Krypton-Suite/Extended-Toolkit holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (61/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Krypton SuiteOrganization
97 followers16 public repossince Feb 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdictionary-en-gbpoints to another repo — not scored3.0.042,65014989 days agodictionaryenenglishgbhunspellkingdommyspellspellingunited

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
11.9/18Commit volume20 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year20
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases2 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 612 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~362.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tag90.24.11.317
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release612
mean_days_between_releases362.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.3/60Stars264 stars
13.4/25Forks41 forks
5.6/15Watchers11 watchers
Inputs used
forks41
stars264
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.955
How it's scored
22/42Issue resolution52% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance287/322 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs287
open_issues117
closed_issues129
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.524
closed_unmerged_prs35
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
14.3/25Owner reach97 followers of Krypton-Suite
21/25Track record16 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers97
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginKrypton-Suite
public_repos16
account_age_days2,335
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnuget, theme, dll, krypton-outlook-grid, colour-palette, colours, krypton, nuget-packages, extended-tookit, winforms, controls, toolbox, netcore, dotnet-core, dotnet, csharp, messagebox, extendedrenderer, vbnet
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno data
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, SAST, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes34/2,125 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes226,417
source_files_sampled2,125
oversized_source_files34
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

264GitHub stars
4contributors
20commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
117open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package 'dictionary-en-gb' points at a different repository (https://github.com/wooorm/dictionaries); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 10:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :37:6: could not parse as YAML: did not find expected key [syntax-check]
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackaginginternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :37:6: could not parse as YAML: did not find expected key [syntax-check]
n/aPinned-Dependenciesinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :37:6: could not parse as YAML: did not find expected key [syntax-check]
n/aSASTinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :37:6: could not parse as YAML: did not find expected key [syntax-check]
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-Permissionsinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :37:6: could not parse as YAML: did not find expected key [syntax-check]
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommandLineParser2.8.0indirect
NuGetCyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker1.7.2indirect
NuGetDotNetZip1.15.0indirect
NuGetHandlebars.Net2.1.6indirect
NuGetILRepack.Lib.MSBuild.Task2.0.40indirect
NuGetILRepack.Lib.MSBuild.Task2.0.44.1indirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking100.25.11.328indirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking95.25.10.293indirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking.Canary100.25.11.318-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking.Lite90.25.2.55indirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking.Nightly100.25.11.318-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking.Signed65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Docking.Signed.Lite65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator100.25.11.328indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator5.550.2106indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator95.25.10.293indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator.Canary100.25.11.318-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator.Lite90.25.2.55indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator.Nightly100.25.11.318-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator.Signed65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Navigator.Signed.Lite65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon100.25.11.328indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon5.550.2106indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon95.25.10.293indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Canary100.25.11.318-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Lite90.25.2.55indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Nightly100.25.11.318-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Nightly100.25.11.323-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Signed65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Ribbon.Signed.Lite65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit100.25.11.328indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit5.550.2103indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit5.550.2106indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit90.25.2.55indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit95.25.10.293indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit95.25.4.111indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary100.25.11.318-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary100.25.6.171-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary70.22.8.234-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary80.23.4.114-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary90.23.11.326-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Canary90.24.6.176-betaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Experimental5.500.2003indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Lite65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Lite90.25.2.55indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly100.25.11.318-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly100.25.11.323-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly100.25.3.80-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly100.25.6.167-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly70.22.9.251-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly80.23.6.156-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Nightly90.23.12.345-alphaindirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Signed65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetKrypton.Toolkit.Signed.Lite65.22.6.152indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualBasic10.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.WebView21.0.1823.32indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.WebView21.0.3595.46indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
NuGetNSec.Cryptography23.9.0-preview.3indirect
NuGetNSec.Cryptography24.4.0indirect
NuGetNSec.Cryptography25.4.0indirect
NuGetPortable.BouncyCastle1.9.0indirect
NuGetProDotNetZip1.20.0indirect
NuGetSimple-MAPI.NET1.2.1indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp3.119.1indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.Views.WindowsForms3.119.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Data.SQLite.Core1.0.119indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Debug4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.DirectoryServices10.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Compression4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Management10.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Management5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Speech10.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetUnofficial.Cyotek.Windows.Forms.NET2.0.1indirect
NuGetUnofficial.WinFormAnimation2.0.2indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePack1.1.1indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePack8.0.12indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePackShell8.0.12indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePackShell8.0.5indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePackShellExtensions8.0.12indirect
NuGetWindowsAPICodePackShellExtensions8.0.5indirect
NuGetZipStorer4.1.0indirect
NuGetZipStorer4.2.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.