Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 05:45 UTC

LFDT-Lockness / givre

Threshold Schnorr Signatures based on FROST in Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗

LFDT-Lockness/givre holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Security (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LocknessOrganization

74 followers16 public repossince Aug 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	givre	0.3.0	3,195	6	36 days ago	eddsa mpc schnorr threshold-signatures tss algorithms cryptography

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

40Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 36 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18	Commit volume — 28 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	28
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	36
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 5 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 36 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~158 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	5
latest_release_tag	v0.3.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	36
mean_days_between_releases	158

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

27At Risk

How it's scored

21.1/60	Stars — 21 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	21
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate

How it's scored

46.7/80	Monthly downloads — 3,195 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	givre
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	28,115
monthly_downloads	3,195
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.903

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
18.5/30	PR acceptance — 24/39 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	24
open_issues	0
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	15
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
13.5/25	Owner reach — 74 followers of LFDT-Lockness
13.2/25	Track record — 16 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	74
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	LFDT-Lockness
public_repos	16
account_age_days	772

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20	Version history — 6 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	givre
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/givre
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.rs/givre
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

77Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

75Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	7.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

85Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: hd-wallet 0.5.1 (moderate)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 638 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	152
unassessed_packages	21
affected_by_severity	moderate 4, low 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 152 resolved dependencies against OSV. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

11Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.9/40	Legible commit history — 20 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.204
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, givre/Cargo.toml, tests/Cargo.toml, wasm/no_std/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/17 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	20,472
source_files_sampled	17
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

21GitHub stars

3contributors

28commits, last 12 months

36days since last push

5releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10

7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 05:45 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9	CI-Tests	9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
8	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 11

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	cggmp24-keygen	`0.7.0-alpha.4`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	key-share	`0.7`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	generic-ec	`0.5`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	digest	`0.10`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	round-based	`—`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	k256	`0.13`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	static_assertions	`1.1`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha2	`0.10`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1`	givre/Cargo.toml
crates.io	hd-wallet	`0.7`	givre/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 147 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	cggmp24-keygen	`—`	direct
crates.io	cggmp24-keygen	`0.7.0-alpha.4`	direct
crates.io	digest	`—`	direct
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	direct
crates.io	generic-ec	`—`	direct
crates.io	generic-ec	`0.4.2`	direct
crates.io	generic-ec	`0.5.2`	direct
crates.io	hd-wallet	`—`	direct
crates.io	hd-wallet	`0.5.1`	direct
crates.io	hd-wallet	`0.7.0`	direct
crates.io	k256	`—`	direct
crates.io	k256	`0.13.3`	direct
crates.io	key-share	`—`	direct
crates.io	key-share	`0.5.0`	direct
crates.io	key-share	`0.7.0`	direct
crates.io	rand_core	`—`	direct
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	direct
crates.io	round-based	`0.3.0`	direct
crates.io	round-based	`0.4.1`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.196`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.197`	direct
crates.io	sha2	`—`	direct
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.8`	direct
crates.io	static_assertions	`—`	direct
crates.io	static_assertions	`1.1.0`	direct
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.86`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	base16ct	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	base58ck	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	base64ct	`1.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	bech32	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin	`0.32.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin-internals	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin-io	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin-units	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitcoin_hashes	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.0.83`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	cggmp21-keygen	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.34`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.38`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.9.6`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-bigint	`0.5.5`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek	`4.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek-derive	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	darling	`0.20.10`	indirect
crates.io	darling	`0.20.6`	indirect
crates.io	darling_core	`0.20.10`	indirect
crates.io	darling_core	`0.20.6`	indirect
crates.io	darling_macro	`0.20.10`	indirect
crates.io	darling_macro	`0.20.6`	indirect
crates.io	der	`0.7.8`	indirect
crates.io	deranged	`0.3.11`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519	`2.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	educe	`0.4.23`	indirect
crates.io	elliptic-curve	`0.13.8`	indirect
crates.io	enum-ordinalize	`3.1.15`	indirect
crates.io	ff	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	fiat-crypto	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`—`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-channel	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-executor	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-io	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-sink	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.30`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-core	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-core	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-curves	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-curves	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-zkp	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	generic-ec-zkp	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-tests	`—`	indirect
crates.io	generic-tests	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.12`	indirect
crates.io	group	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	hex	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hex	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	hex-conservative	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	hex-literal	`—`	indirect
crates.io	hex-literal	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	hex_lit	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	hmac	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	ident_case	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.10`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.153`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	num-conv	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.18`	indirect
crates.io	phantom-type	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	phantom-type	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.13`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.14`	indirect
crates.io	pin-utils	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	pkcs8	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	platforms	`3.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	powerfmt	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.79`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.92`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.35`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_dev	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rand_dev	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_hash	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	round-based-derive	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	round-based-derive	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	sec1	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	secp256k1	`—`	indirect
crates.io	secp256k1	`0.29.0`	indirect
crates.io	secp256k1-sys	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.196`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.197`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.113`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.120`	indirect
crates.io	serde_with	`2.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	serde_with_macros	`2.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	signature	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.9`	indirect
crates.io	spki	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`1.0.109`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.52`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.90`	indirect
crates.io	test-case	`—`	indirect
crates.io	test-case	`3.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	test-case-core	`3.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	test-case-macros	`3.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.57`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.57`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.36`	indirect
crates.io	time-core	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`0.1.40`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-core	`0.1.32`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	udigest	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	udigest-derive	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.12`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize_derive	`1.4.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 152 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
hd-wallet	`0.5.1`	direct	moderate	1	`0.6.0`
serde_with	`2.3.3`	indirect	moderate	1	`3.21.0`
time	`0.3.34`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.3.47`
time	`0.3.36`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.3.47`
curve25519-dalek	`4.1.2`	indirect	low	2	`4.1.3`
rand	`0.8.5`	indirect	low	2	`0.10.1`
anyhow	`1.0.86`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records