Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 11:59 UTC

LegendApp / legend-list

A high-performance list component for React Native and React

TypeScriptMIT★ 3,363 stars⑂ 146 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

LegendApp/legend-list holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LegendOrganization

190 followers14 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@legendapp/list	3.3.11	1,864,967	267	1 day ago	react react-native list

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
34.6/36	Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,230 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,230
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	50

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~7.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	38
latest_release_tag	v3.3.11
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	7.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

82Excellent

How it's scored

57.2/60	Stars — 3,363 stars
18/25	Forks — 146 forks
7.1/15	Watchers — 20 watchers

Inputs used

forks	146
stars	3,363
watchers	20
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,864,967 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@legendapp/list
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	1,864,967
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	35
top_contributor_share	0.94

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate

How it's scored

35/42	Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
19.1/30	PR acceptance — 96/151 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	96
open_issues	58
closed_issues	289
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.833
closed_unmerged_prs	55
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.4/25	Owner reach — 190 followers of LegendApp
20.6/25	Track record — 14 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	190
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	LegendApp
public_repos	14
account_age_days	2,419

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 267 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@legendapp/list
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.legendapp.com/open-source/list
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.legendapp.com/open-source/list
docs_site	https://www.legendapp.com/open-source/list
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 174 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	11
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	7
scorecard_aggregate	3.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	17
unassessed_packages	92
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 17 resolved dependencies against OSV. 92 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/changelog.mdc, AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.77
agent_instruction_files	.cursor/rules/changelog.mdc, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	6,956

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

49Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11	Static type checking — example-oldarch/tsconfig.json, example-web/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	example-oldarch/tsconfig.json, example-web/tsconfig.json, example/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 3/580 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	115,070
source_files_sampled	580
oversized_source_files	3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — example, examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, examples
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,363GitHub stars

35contributors

1,230commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

38releases

1bus factor

58open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Star history carried forward from 2026-07-21: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 3363 stars today.
deps.dev does not index npm:@legendapp/list@3.3.11; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 3,271 ★ / 146 ⇿

3,271Stars

146Forks

37Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-21. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

Major 1Minor 3Patch 33

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10

3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 11:59 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	174 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 44

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@expo/vector-icons	`^14.1.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@legendapp/motion	`^2.4.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@legendapp/state	`^3.0.0-beta.19`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@react-navigation/bottom-tabs	`^7.3.10`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@react-navigation/native	`^7.1.6`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@shopify/flash-list	`1`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	babel-plugin-react-compiler	`^19.1.0-rc.2`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	countries-list	`^3.1.1`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo	`^53.0.11`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-atlas	`^0.4.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-blur	`~14.1.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-constants	`~17.1.6`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-dev-client	`~5.2.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-font	`~13.3.1`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-haptics	`~14.1.4`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-linear-gradient	`~14.1.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-linking	`~7.1.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-router	`~5.1.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-splash-screen	`~0.30.9`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-status-bar	`~2.2.3`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-symbols	`~0.4.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-system-ui	`~5.0.8`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	expo-web-browser	`~14.1.6`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react	`19.0.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-compiler-runtime	`^19.1.0-rc.2`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-dom	`19.0.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native	`0.79.3`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-gesture-handler	`~2.24.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-keyboard-controller	`^1.22.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-reanimated	`~3.17.4`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-redash	`^18.1.3`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-safe-area-context	`5.4.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-screens	`~4.11.1`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-web	`^0.20.0`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	react-native-webview	`13.13.5`	example-oldarch/package.json
npm	@tanstack/react-router	`^1.59.0`	example-web/package.json
npm	@tanstack/react-virtual	`^3.13.12`	example-web/package.json
npm	countries-list	`^3.1.0`	example-web/package.json
npm	react	`^18.2.0`	example-web/package.json
npm	react-dom	`^18.2.0`	example-web/package.json
npm	react-virtuoso	`^4.13.0`	example-web/package.json
npm	react-window	`^2.2.5`	example-web/package.json
npm	virtua	`^0.41.5`	example-web/package.json
npm	use-sync-external-store	`^1.5.0`	package.json

All dependencies 109

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 71 direct and 38 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@expo/vector-icons	`^14.1.0`	direct
npm	@expo/vector-icons	`^15.0.3`	direct
npm	@legendapp/motion	`^2.4.0`	direct
npm	@legendapp/state	`^3.0.0-beta.19`	direct
npm	@react-navigation/bottom-tabs	`^7.3.10`	direct
npm	@react-navigation/native	`^7.1.6`	direct
npm	@shopify/flash-list	`1`	direct
npm	@shopify/flash-list	`2.3.2`	direct
npm	@tanstack/react-router	`^1.59.0`	direct
npm	@tanstack/react-virtual	`^3.13.12`	direct
npm	babel-plugin-react-compiler	`^19.1.0-rc.2`	direct
npm	countries-list	`^3.1.0`	direct
npm	countries-list	`^3.1.1`	direct
npm	expo	`^53.0.11`	direct
npm	expo	`~54.0.33`	direct
npm	expo-atlas	`^0.4.0`	direct
npm	expo-blur	`~14.1.5`	direct
npm	expo-blur	`~15.0.8`	direct
npm	expo-constants	`~17.1.6`	direct
npm	expo-constants	`~18.0.13`	direct
npm	expo-dev-client	`~5.2.0`	direct
npm	expo-dev-client	`~6.0.20`	direct
npm	expo-font	`~13.3.1`	direct
npm	expo-font	`~14.0.11`	direct
npm	expo-haptics	`~14.1.4`	direct
npm	expo-haptics	`~15.0.8`	direct
npm	expo-linear-gradient	`~14.1.5`	direct
npm	expo-linear-gradient	`~15.0.8`	direct
npm	expo-linking	`~7.1.5`	direct
npm	expo-linking	`~8.0.11`	direct
npm	expo-router	`~5.1.0`	direct
npm	expo-router	`~6.0.23`	direct
npm	expo-splash-screen	`~0.30.9`	direct
npm	expo-splash-screen	`~31.0.13`	direct
npm	expo-status-bar	`~2.2.3`	direct
npm	expo-status-bar	`~3.0.9`	direct
npm	expo-symbols	`~0.4.5`	direct
npm	expo-symbols	`~1.0.8`	direct
npm	expo-system-ui	`~5.0.8`	direct
npm	expo-system-ui	`~6.0.9`	direct
npm	expo-web-browser	`~14.1.6`	direct
npm	expo-web-browser	`~15.0.10`	direct
npm	react	`19.0.0`	direct
npm	react	`19.1.0`	direct
npm	react	`^18.2.0`	direct
npm	react-compiler-runtime	`^19.1.0-rc.2`	direct
npm	react-dom	`19.0.0`	direct
npm	react-dom	`19.1.0`	direct
npm	react-dom	`^18.2.0`	direct
npm	react-dom	`^19.2.0`	direct
npm	react-native	`0.79.3`	direct
npm	react-native	`0.81.5`	direct
npm	react-native-gesture-handler	`~2.24.0`	direct
npm	react-native-gesture-handler	`~2.28.0`	direct
npm	react-native-keyboard-controller	`^1.22.5`	direct
npm	react-native-reanimated	`4.3.0`	direct
npm	react-native-reanimated	`~3.17.4`	direct
npm	react-native-reanimated	`~4.2.1`	direct
npm	react-native-redash	`^18.1.3`	direct
npm	react-native-safe-area-context	`5.4.0`	direct
npm	react-native-safe-area-context	`~5.6.0`	direct
npm	react-native-screens	`~4.11.1`	direct
npm	react-native-screens	`~4.16.0`	direct
npm	react-native-web	`^0.20.0`	direct
npm	react-native-web	`^0.21.0`	direct
npm	react-native-webview	`13.13.5`	direct
npm	react-native-webview	`13.15.0`	direct
npm	react-virtuoso	`^4.13.0`	direct
npm	react-window	`^2.2.5`	direct
npm	use-sync-external-store	`^1.5.0`	direct
npm	virtua	`^0.41.5`	direct
npm	@babel/core	`^7.27.4`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/biome	`^2.1.2`	indirect
npm	@react-native-community/cli	`latest`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`^4.1.14`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/jest-native	`^5.4.3`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/react-native	`^13.2.0`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/user-event	`^14.6.1`	indirect
npm	@types/bun	`^1.1.13`	indirect
npm	@types/expo__vector-icons	`^10.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/jest	`^29.5.14`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^18.2.15`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`~19.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`~19.1.10`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`^18.2.7`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`^19.2.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react-test-renderer	`^19.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react-test-renderer	`^19.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/use-sync-external-store	`^1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview	`^7.0.0-dev.20250816.1`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`^5.0.4`	indirect
npm	expo-build-properties	`~1.0.10`	indirect
npm	expo-image	`~3.0.11`	indirect
npm	jest	`^30.0.4`	indirect
npm	jest	`~29.7.0`	indirect
npm	jest-expo	`~53.0.7`	indirect
npm	jest-expo	`~54.0.17`	indirect
npm	react-native-worklets	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	react-native-worklets-core	`1.6.3`	indirect
npm	react-test-renderer	`19.0.0`	indirect
npm	react-test-renderer	`19.1.0`	indirect
npm	tailwindcss	`^4.0.0`	indirect
npm	tsup	`^8.5.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.0.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.8.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`~5.8.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`~5.9.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`^7.1.11`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-mkcert	`^1.17.9`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 17 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 92 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records