Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 00:21 UTC

Loophole-LLC / Bastillion

Bastillion gives you a clean, browser-based way to manage SSH access across all your systems—like a bastion host with a friendly dashboard.

Java · HTMLCustom license★ 3,551 stars⑂ 399 forkssince Feb 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

Loophole-LLC/Bastillion holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (40/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Loophole, LLCOrganization
2 followers6 public repossince Sep 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 358 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year358
human_commit_share0.7
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~194 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv6.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release12
mean_days_between_releases194

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.6/60Stars — 3,551 stars
21.7/25Forks — 399 forks
11.4/15Watchers — 115 watchers
Inputs used
forks399
stars3,551
watchers115
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.955
How it's scored
27/42Issue resolution — 64% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance — 261/334 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs261
open_issues130
closed_issues235
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.644
closed_unmerged_prs73
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of Loophole-LLC
6.3/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginLoophole-LLC
public_repos6
account_age_days30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://loophole.company
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsssh, bastion-host, java, javascript, web-app, web-based, ssh-client, ssh-key, ssh-server, devops, remote-access, security, self-hosted, two-factor-authentication
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://loophole.company
docs_sitehttps://loophole.company
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages97
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 97 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://loophole.company/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 56 of 70 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://loophole.company/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.8
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — pom.xml, tools/migrate/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 30 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.26
toolchain_manifestspom.xml, tools/migrate/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.3
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/155 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes61,233
source_files_sampled155
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

3,551GitHub stars
17contributors
358commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
130open issues
Maven, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'io.bastillion:bastillion' from its registry
  • Could not fetch npm package 'bastillion' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'io.bastillion:bastillion-migrate' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 399 ⇿
0Stars
399Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400389112013-042020-012026-10
Major 1Minor 11Patch 11

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 00:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 42
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@xterm/addon-fit0.11.0package.json
npm@xterm/xterm6.0.0package.json
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8package.json
npmbootstrap5.3.8package.json
npmfloatthead2.2.5package.json
npmjquery4.0.0package.json
npmjquery-ui1.14.2package.json
Mavenorg.apache.mina:mina-core2.2.10pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.santuario:xmlsec4.0.4pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.21.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.20pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j2-impl2.26.1pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.26.1pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.26.1pom.xml
Mavenorg.thymeleaf:thymeleaf3.1.5.RELEASEpom.xml
Mavencom.h2database:h22.5.252pom.xml
Mavencom.github.mwiede:jsch2.28.8pom.xml
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on1.86pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-fileupload2-jakarta2.0.0-SNAPSHOTpom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.23.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-dbcp22.14.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-configuration22.15.1pom.xml
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.11.0pom.xml
Mavencom.google.zxing:core3.5.4pom.xml
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server12.1.14pom.xml
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10:jetty-ee10-webapp12.1.14pom.xml
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security12.1.14pom.xml
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10.websocket:jetty-ee10-websocket-jakarta-server12.1.14pom.xml
Mavenjakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api6.1.0pom.xml
Mavencom.onelogin:java-saml-core2.9.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.20.0tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-configuration22.15.1tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.11.0tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.19.0tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.22.0tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.18tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j2-impl2.26.1tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.26.1tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.26.1tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavencom.h2database:h22.4.240tools/migrate/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.0tools/migrate/pom.xml
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.github.mwiede:jsch2.28.8direct
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.0direct
Mavencom.google.zxing:core3.5.4direct
Mavencom.h2database:h22.4.240direct
Mavencom.h2database:h22.5.252direct
Mavencom.onelogin:java-saml-core2.9.0direct
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.11.0direct
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.22.0direct
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.23.0direct
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.19.0direct
Mavenjakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api6.1.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-configuration22.15.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-dbcp22.14.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-fileupload2-jakarta2.0.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.20.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.21.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.26.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.26.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j2-impl2.26.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.santuario:xmlsec4.0.4direct
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on1.86direct
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10.websocket:jetty-ee10-websocket-jakarta-server12.1.14direct
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10:jetty-ee10-webapp12.1.14direct
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security12.1.14direct
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server12.1.14direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.18direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.20direct
Mavenorg.thymeleaf:thymeleaf3.1.5.RELEASEdirect
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8direct
npm@xterm/addon-fit0.11.0direct
npm@xterm/xterm6.0.0direct
npmbootstrap5.3.8direct
npmfloatthead2.2.5direct
npmjquery4.0.0direct
npmjquery-ui1.14.2direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.woodstox:woodstox-core7.1.0indirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.48.0indirect
Mavencommons-collections:commons-collections3.2.2indirect
Mavencommons-logging:commons-logging1.3.5indirect
Mavenjakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api2.1.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.enterprise:jakarta.enterprise.cdi-api4.0.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.enterprise:jakarta.enterprise.lang-model4.0.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.inject:jakarta.inject-api2.0.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.interceptor:jakarta.interceptor-api2.1.0indirect
Mavenjakarta.transaction:jakarta.transaction-api1.3.3indirect
Mavenjakarta.websocket:jakarta.websocket-api2.1.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.websocket:jakarta.websocket-client-api2.1.1indirect
Mavenjoda-time:joda-time2.10.6indirect
Mavennet.bytebuddy:byte-buddy1.17.7indirect
Mavennet.bytebuddy:byte-buddy-agent1.17.7indirect
Mavenognl:ognl3.3.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-fileupload2-core2.0.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-pool22.13.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text1.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apiguardian:apiguardian-api1.1.2indirect
Mavenorg.attoparser:attoparser2.0.7.RELEASEindirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.woodstox:stax2-api4.2.2indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.compression:jetty-compression-common12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.compression:jetty-compression-gzip12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10.websocket:jetty-ee10-websocket-jakarta-client12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10.websocket:jetty-ee10-websocket-jakarta-common12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10.websocket:jetty-ee10-websocket-servlet12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10:jetty-ee10-annotations12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10:jetty-ee10-plus12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee10:jetty-ee10-servlet12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee:jetty-ee-webapp12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.websocket:jetty-websocket-core-client12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.websocket:jetty-websocket-core-common12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.websocket:jetty-websocket-core-server12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-alpn-client12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-annotations12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-client12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-io12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-jndi12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-plus12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-session12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-util12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty:jetty-xml12.1.14indirect
Mavenorg.javassist:javassist3.29.0-GAindirect
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-engine6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core5.24.0indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-junit-jupiter5.24.0indirect
Mavenorg.objenesis:objenesis3.3indirect
Mavenorg.opentest4j:opentest4j1.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.ow2.asm:asm9.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.ow2.asm:asm-commons9.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.ow2.asm:asm-tree9.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.unbescape:unbescape1.1.6.RELEASEindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 97 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.