Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 03:30 UTC

LordMike / MBW.HassMQTT

Client library to interact with Home Assistant over MQTT. Implements models, services and helpers to help model HASS entities and update them

C#No license detected★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2020View on GitHub ↗

LordMike/MBW.HassMQTT holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Security (58/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (28/100). It was last updated 45 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Michael BisbjergPersonal account
144 followers119 public repossince Sep 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices4.0.0-2954 days agohome-assistanthassmqttdiscovery
NuGetMBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels4.0.0-2954 days agohome-assistanthassmqttdiscovery
NuGetMBW.HassMQTT4.0.0-2954 days agohome-assistanthassmqttdiscovery

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 45 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
11.7/18Commit volume — 19 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year19
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push45
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 30 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 52 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~195.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv5.0.0-alpha
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release52
mean_days_between_releases195.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52/80Total downloads — 99,965 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices, MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels, MBW.HassMQTT
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads99,965
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 19/20 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs19
open_issues2
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.5/25Owner reach — 144 followers of LordMike
25/25Track record — 119 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers144
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginLordMike
public_repos119
account_age_days5,483
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices, MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels, MBW.HassMQTT
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshome-assistant, hass, mqtt
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 17 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.8/40Legible commit history — 39 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.39
agent_instruction_filesMBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,794
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — MBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices/MBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators/MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsMBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices/MBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators/MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj, MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/184 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes35,455
source_files_sampled184
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
19commits, last 12 months
45days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 03:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests11 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices/MBW.HassMQTT.CommonServices.csproj
NuGetEnums.NET5.0.0MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj
NuGetFluentValidation12.1.1MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj
NuGetFody6.9.3MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj
NuGetPropertyChanged.Fody4.1.0MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels/MBW.HassMQTT.DiscoveryModels.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators/MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.11.0MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators/MBW.HassMQTT.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetMQTTnet.Server5.2.0.1603MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5MBW.HassMQTT.Tests/MBW.HassMQTT.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.10MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
NuGetMQTTnet5.2.0.1603MBW.HassMQTT/MBW.HassMQTT.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetEnums.NET5.0.0direct
NuGetFluentValidation12.1.1direct
NuGetFody6.9.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMQTTnet5.2.0.1603direct
NuGetMQTTnet.Server5.2.0.1603direct
NuGetPropertyChanged.Fody4.1.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 17 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.