Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-10 23:50 UTC

MarshalX / yandex-music-api

Неофициальная Python библиотека для работы с API сервиса Яндекс.Музыка

PythonLGPL-3.0★ 1,276 stars⑂ 103 forkssince May 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#python#yandex#yandex-music#api#library#yandexmusic#yandex-api#async#asyncio#asynchronous

MarshalX/yandex-music-api holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Security (30/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Ilya SiamionauPersonal account
535 followers76 public repossince Oct 2015@Datadog

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIyandex-music3.2.215,018290 days agoapiclientlibrarymusicpythonwrapperyandex

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

67Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
16.1/18Commit volume — 61 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year61
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~265.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv3.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases265.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

76Good
How it's scored
50.4/60Stars — 1,276 stars
16.7/25Forks — 103 forks
8.4/15Watchers — 33 watchers
Inputs used
forks103
stars1,276
watchers33
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (LGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good
How it's scored
55.7/80Monthly downloads — 15,018 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesyandex-music
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads15,018
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.857

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
40.1/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 283/332 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs283
open_issues17
closed_issues361
prs_merged_7d16
prs_decided_7d16
prs_merged_30d22
prs_decided_30d22
issue_closed_ratio0.955
closed_unmerged_prs49
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.6/25Owner reach — 535 followers of MarshalX
25/25Track record — 76 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers535
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginMarshalX
public_repos76
account_age_days3,997
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesyandex-music
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ym.marshal.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, yandex, yandex-music, api, library, yandexmusic, yandex-api, async, asyncio, asynchronous
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ym.marshal.dev
docs_sitehttps://ym.marshal.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

24At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 62 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier24
security_posture_before_jurisdiction49
High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

56Moderate
How it's scored
14.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: requests 2.26.0 (moderate 6.1), requests 2.32.4 (moderate 5.5), requests 2.32.5 (moderate 5.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
28/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,237 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories248
affected_packages32
assessed_packages189
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 14, moderate 14
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 189 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

38Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.4/40Legible commit history — 72 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.72
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — yandex_music/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsyandex_music/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (yandex_music/py.typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/617 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes81,574
source_files_sampled617
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — docs/source/_extra/api/openapi.json
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/source/_extra/api/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,276GitHub stars
28contributors
61commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
17open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:yandex-music@3.2.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 103 ⇿
0Stars
103Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010010022019-072023-022026-09
Major 3Minor 2Patch 0

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-10 23:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities62 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.4.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 189

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 182 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIrequests2.26.0direct
PyPIrequests2.32.4direct
PyPIrequests2.32.5direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPItyping-extensions3.10.0.2direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.13.2direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIaiofiles24.1.0indirect
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.4.4indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.10.11indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.5indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.3.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.12indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIatomicwrites1.4.0indirect
PyPIattrs21.2.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.9.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbetterproto1.2.5indirect
PyPIblack21.9b0indirect
PyPIblack24.8.0indirect
PyPIblack25.11.0indirect
PyPIblack26.10.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2021.5.30indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer2.0.6indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.2indirect
PyPIclick8.0.1indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcodecov2.1.12indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage5.5indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.2indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcryptography47.0.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.17.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.5.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgrpclib0.4.8indirect
PyPIgrpclib0.4.9indirect
PyPIh24.1.0indirect
PyPIh24.3.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhpack4.0.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.1.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.0.1indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIidna3.2indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimagesize1.2.0indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata4.8.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig1.1.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.0.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.0.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.4indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.1.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions0.4.3indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.0.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.10.15indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.5indirect
PyPIorjson3.12.0indirect
PyPIpackaging21.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathspec0.9.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs2.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.12.3indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.0.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.2.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.4indirect
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.36.2indirect
PyPIpy1.10.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.27.2indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.49.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.10.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing2.4.7indirect
PyPIpyrefly1.3.2indirect
PyPIpysocks1.7.1indirect
PyPIpytest6.2.5indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.5indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov2.12.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2021.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIregex2021.8.28indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruff0.16.10indirect
PyPIsetuptools75.3.4indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.1.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.10indirect
PyPIsphinx4.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-docsearch0.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-last-updated-by-git0.3.8indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme1.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-sitemap2.9.0indirect
PyPIsphinxawesome-theme6.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp1.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp1.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp1.0.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml1.1.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph0.13.0indirect
PyPIstringcase1.2.0indirect
PyPItokenize-rt6.0.0indirect
PyPItokenize-rt6.2.0indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomli1.2.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItypes-aiofiles24.1.0.20241221indirect
PyPItypes-aiofiles25.1.0.20251011indirect
PyPItypes-aiofiles25.1.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.0.20241016indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20261006indirect
PyPIujson4.1.0indirect
PyPIujson5.10.0indirect
PyPIujson5.11.0indirect
PyPIujson6.0.0indirect
PyPIunasync0.6.0indirect
PyPIurllib31.26.6indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets13.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.15.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.25.1indirect
PyPIzipp3.5.0indirect
Dependency advisories 32

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 189 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 32 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
aiohttp3.10.11indirectcritical663.14.3
black21.9b0indirectcritical426.3.1
black24.8.0indirectcritical326.3.1
black25.11.0indirectcritical326.3.1
aiohttp3.13.5indirecthigh283.14.3
certifi2021.5.30indirecthigh62024.7.4
cryptography47.0.0indirecthigh750.0.0
idna3.2indirecthigh43.15
jinja23.0.1indirecthigh103.1.6
orjson3.10.15indirecthigh23.11.6
orjson3.11.5indirecthigh13.11.6
setuptools75.3.4indirecthigh483.0.0
ujson4.1.0indirecthigh115.13.0
ujson5.10.0indirecthigh85.13.0
ujson5.11.0indirecthigh85.13.0
urllib31.26.6indirecthigh202.8.0
urllib32.2.3indirecthigh162.8.0
urllib32.6.3indirecthigh102.8.0
requests2.26.0directmoderate82.33.0
requests2.32.4directmoderate22.33.0
requests2.32.5directmoderate22.33.0
h24.1.0indirectmoderate44.4.1
h24.3.0indirectmoderate24.4.1
hpack4.0.0indirectmoderate24.2.0
hpack4.1.0indirectmoderate24.2.0
multidict6.7.1indirectmoderate16.9.1
pygments2.10.0indirectmoderate42.20.0
pytest6.2.5indirectmoderate29.0.3
pytest8.3.5indirectmoderate29.0.3
pytest8.4.2indirectmoderate29.0.3
setuptools82.0.1indirectmoderate283.0.0
zipp3.5.0indirectmoderate23.19.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with MarshalX/yandex-music-api. Read them side by side →

98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional98mem0ai/mem0The Memory Layer for AI Agents - Drop-in memory infrastructure for AI agents and apps. Context that persists. Built for production.Exceptional98python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-botWe have made you a wrapper you can't refuseExceptional98microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.