Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 01:49 UTC

MasterKale / SimpleWebAuthn

WebAuthn, Simplified. A collection of TypeScript-first libraries for simpler WebAuthn integration. Supports modern browsers, Node, Deno, and more.

TypeScriptMIT★ 2,307 stars⑂ 199 forkssince May 2020View on GitHub ↗

MasterKale/SimpleWebAuthn holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Matthew MillerPersonal account
281 followers59 public repossince Aug 2013Duo Security at @cisco-sbg

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume129 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year129
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases88 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 49 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~58.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count88
latest_release_tagv13.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases58.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
54.5/60Stars2,307 stars
19.1/25Forks199 forks
7.6/15Watchers24 watchers
Inputs used
forks199
stars2,307
watchers24
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.954
How it's scored
40.6/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance228/290 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs228
open_issues10
closed_issues284
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.966
closed_unmerged_prs62
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.6/25Owner reach281 followers of MasterKale
24.9/25Track record59 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers281
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMasterKale
public_repos59
account_age_days4,755
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://simplewebauthn.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswebauthn, typescript, node, browser, umd, fido, passkeys, commonjs, deno, denoland, esm
has_wikino
homepagehttps://simplewebauthn.dev
docs_sitehttps://simplewebauthn.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages2
assessed_packages150
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.1/40Legible commit history17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.17
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingexample/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsexample/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes2/137 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes2,287,555
source_files_sampled137
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,307GitHub stars
21contributors
129commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
88releases
1bus factor
10open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 199 ⇿
0Stars
199Forks
84Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020019842020-072023-072026-07
Major 13Minor 27Patch 44

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 01:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@hexagon/base641.1.28indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@levischuck/tiny-cbor0.2.11indirect
npm@peculiar/asn1-android2.8.0indirect
npm@peculiar/asn1-ecc2.8.0indirect
npm@peculiar/asn1-rsa2.8.0indirect
npm@peculiar/asn1-schema2.8.0indirect
npm@peculiar/asn1-x5092.8.0indirect
npm@peculiar/utils2.0.3indirect
npm@simplewebauthn/server13.1.2indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.12indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.4indirect
npm@types/body-parser1.19.6indirect
npm@types/connect3.4.38indirect
npm@types/express4.17.25indirect
npm@types/express-serve-static-core4.19.8indirect
npm@types/express-session1.19.0indirect
npm@types/http-errors2.0.5indirect
npm@types/mime1.3.5indirect
npm@types/node20.19.43indirect
npm@types/qs6.15.1indirect
npm@types/range-parser1.2.7indirect
npm@types/send0.17.6indirect
npm@types/send1.2.1indirect
npm@types/serve-static1.15.10indirect
npmaccepts1.3.8indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.5indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmarray-flatten1.1.1indirect
npmasn1js3.0.10indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbody-parser1.20.5indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcontent-disposition0.5.4indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.0.7indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmdebug2.6.9indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdestroy1.2.0indirect
npmdiff4.0.4indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmexpress4.22.2indirect
npmexpress-session1.19.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfinalhandler1.3.2indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh0.5.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.4.24indirect
npmignore-by-default1.0.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmlru-cache4.1.5indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer0.3.0indirect
npmmemorystore1.6.8indirect
npmmerge-descriptors1.0.3indirect
npmmethods1.1.2indirect
npmmime1.6.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnegotiator0.6.3indirect
npmnodemon3.1.14indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmon-headers1.1.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-to-regexp0.1.13indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmpseudomap1.0.2indirect
npmpstree.remy1.1.8indirect
npmpvtsutils1.3.6indirect
npmpvutils1.1.5indirect
npmqs6.15.2indirect
npmrandom-bytes1.0.0indirect
npmrange-parser1.2.1indirect
npmraw-body2.5.3indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmsend0.19.2indirect
npmserve-static1.16.3indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsimple-update-notifier2.0.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtouch3.1.1indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-is1.6.18indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmuid-safe2.1.5indirect
npmundefsafe2.0.5indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmutils-merge1.0.1indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmyallist2.1.2indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.6indirecthigh35.0.9
body-parser1.20.5indirectlow12.3.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.