Public recordWeak
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 01:22 UTC
MaterializeInc / rust-postgres
Native PostgreSQL driver for the Rust programming language
MaterializeInc/rust-postgres holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (29/100). It was last updated 282 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
39
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Materialize, Inc.Organization · verified domain
209 followers160 public repossince Feb 2019
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | codegenpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.3.0 | 113,425 | 7 | 287 days ago | — |
| crates.io | postgrespoints to another repo — not scored | 0.19.14 | 1,083,580 | 110 | 99 days ago | databasepostgrespostgresqlsql |
| crates.io | postgres-typespoints to another repo — not scored | 0.2.14 | 6,154,641 | 21 | 99 days ago | databasepostgrespostgresqlsql |
| crates.io | tokio-postgrespoints to another repo — not scored | 0.7.18 | 5,775,738 | 38 | 99 days ago | asyncdatabasepostgrespostgresqlsql |
| crates.io | postgres-derivepoints to another repo — not scored | 0.4.9 | 678,814 | 19 | 99 days ago | — |
| crates.io | postgres-opensslpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.5.3 | 191,958 | 10 | 173 days ago | — |
| crates.io | postgres-protocolpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.6.12 | 6,177,159 | 29 | 99 days ago | — |
| crates.io | postgres-native-tlspoints to another repo — not scored | 0.5.3 | 870,892 | 11 | 173 days ago | — |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
34
Development activity
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 3.6/36 | Push recency — last push 282 days ago |
| 6.2/36 | Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits |
| 15/18 | Commit volume — 46 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 46 |
| human_commit_share | 0.98 |
| days_since_last_push | 282 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 9 |
Release discipline
48Weak
How it's scored
| 16.2/27 | Ships releases — 9 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| 0/36 | Release recency — latest release 3,449 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~30.9 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 9 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.11.12 |
| releases_from_tags | yes |
| days_since_latest_release | 3,449 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 30.9 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
29
Popularity & adoption
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 21.4/60 | Stars — 22 stars |
| 11.5/25 | Forks — 25 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 1 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 25 |
| stars | 22 |
| watchers | 1 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | no |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
54
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 3.4/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 85% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 98 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 98 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.847 |
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 17.3/30 | PR acceptance — 15/26 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 15 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 11 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 16.7/25 | Owner reach — 209 followers of MaterializeInc |
| 25/25 | Track record — 160 public repos, account ~7 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 209 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | MaterializeInc |
| public_repos | 160 |
| account_age_days | 2,773 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
36
Engineering practices
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 1 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 12/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 0/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | no |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | no |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
57
Security posture
46Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 1.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 35 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 3 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:codegen@0.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
61
Agent context & guidance
37Weak
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 37/40 | Legible commit history — 68 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.694 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive-test/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Rust (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | Cargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive-test/Cargo.toml, postgres-derive/Cargo.toml, postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml, postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml, postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml, postgres-replication/Cargo.toml, postgres-types/Cargo.toml, postgres/Cargo.toml, tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.02 |
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed) |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/134 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Rust |
| largest_source_bytes | 57,569 |
| source_files_sampled | 134 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Key facts
22GitHub stars
98contributors
46commits, last 12 months
282days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Community profile unavailable
- crates package 'codegen' points at a different repository (https://gitlab.com/yovoslav/codegen.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres-types' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'tokio-postgres' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres-derive' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres-openssl' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres-protocol' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- crates package 'postgres-native-tls' points at a different repository (https://github.com/rust-postgres/rust-postgres); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿
0Stars
25Forks
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Each point covers 5 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 6 | CI-Tests | 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 35 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 83
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | phf_codegen | 0.13 | codegen/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | regex | 1.0 | codegen/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | marksman_escape | 0.1 | codegen/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | linked-hash-map | 0.5 | codegen/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | syn | 2.0 | postgres-derive/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | proc-macro2 | 1.0 | postgres-derive/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | quote | 1.0 | postgres-derive/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | heck | 0.5 | postgres-derive/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | native-tls | 0.2 | postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1.0 | postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-native-tls | 0.3 | postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-postgres | 0.7.14 | postgres-native-tls/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | openssl | 0.10 | postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1.0 | postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-openssl | 0.6 | postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-postgres | 0.7.14 | postgres-openssl/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | base64 | 0.22 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | byteorder | 1.0 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.0 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | fallible-iterator | 0.2 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hmac | 0.12 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | md-5 | 0.10 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | memchr | 2.0 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand | 0.9 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha2 | 0.10 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | stringprep | 0.1 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | getrandom | 0.3 | postgres-protocol/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.0 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | memchr | 2.0 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | byteorder | 1.0 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-protocol | 0.6.7 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-types | 0.2.7 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-postgres | 0.7.11 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures-util | 0.3 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pin-project-lite | 0.2 | postgres-replication/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.0 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | fallible-iterator | 0.2 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-protocol | 0.6.9 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-derive | 0.4.7 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | array-init | 2 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bit-vec-06 | 0.6 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bit-vec-07 | 0.7 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bit-vec-08 | 0.8 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | chrono-04 | 0.4.16 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | cidr-02 | 0.2 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | cidr-03 | 0.3 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | eui48-04 | 0.4.6 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | eui48-1 | 1.0 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | geo-types-06 | 0.6 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | geo-types-0_7 | 0.7.8 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | jiff-01 | 0.1 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | jiff-02 | 0.2 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde-1 | 1.0.221 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde_json-1 | 1.0.144 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | uuid-08 | 0.8 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | uuid-1 | 1.0 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | time-02 | 0.2.7 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | time-03 | 0.3.5 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | smol_str-01 | 0.1.23 | postgres-types/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.0 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | fallible-iterator | 0.2 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures-util | 0.3.14 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | 0.4 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-postgres | 0.7.15 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1.0 | postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-trait | 0.1 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.0 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | byteorder | 1.0 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | fallible-iterator | 0.2 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures-channel | 0.3 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures-util | 0.3 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | 0.4 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | parking_lot | 0.12 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | percent-encoding | 2.0 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pin-project-lite | 0.2.11 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | phf | 0.13 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-protocol | 0.6.9 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | postgres-types | 0.2.10 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde | 1.0 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1.27 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-util | 0.7 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand | 0.9.0 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | whoami | 1.4.1 | tokio-postgres/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies 57
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 40 direct and 17 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | array-init | — | direct |
| crates.io | async-trait | — | direct |
| crates.io | base64 | — | direct |
| crates.io | byteorder | — | direct |
| crates.io | bytes | — | direct |
| crates.io | fallible-iterator | — | direct |
| crates.io | futures-channel | — | direct |
| crates.io | futures-util | — | direct |
| crates.io | getrandom | — | direct |
| crates.io | heck | — | direct |
| crates.io | hmac | — | direct |
| crates.io | linked-hash-map | — | direct |
| crates.io | log | — | direct |
| crates.io | marksman_escape | — | direct |
| crates.io | md-5 | — | direct |
| crates.io | memchr | — | direct |
| crates.io | native-tls | — | direct |
| crates.io | openssl | — | direct |
| crates.io | parking_lot | — | direct |
| crates.io | percent-encoding | — | direct |
| crates.io | phf | — | direct |
| crates.io | phf_codegen | — | direct |
| crates.io | pin-project-lite | — | direct |
| crates.io | postgres-derive | — | direct |
| crates.io | postgres-protocol | — | direct |
| crates.io | postgres-types | — | direct |
| crates.io | proc-macro2 | — | direct |
| crates.io | quote | — | direct |
| crates.io | rand | — | direct |
| crates.io | regex | — | direct |
| crates.io | serde | — | direct |
| crates.io | sha2 | — | direct |
| crates.io | stringprep | — | direct |
| crates.io | syn | — | direct |
| crates.io | tokio | — | direct |
| crates.io | tokio-native-tls | — | direct |
| crates.io | tokio-openssl | — | direct |
| crates.io | tokio-postgres | — | direct |
| crates.io | tokio-util | — | direct |
| crates.io | whoami | — | direct |
| crates.io | bit-vec | — | indirect |
| crates.io | chrono | — | indirect |
| crates.io | cidr | — | indirect |
| crates.io | criterion | — | indirect |
| crates.io | env_logger | — | indirect |
| crates.io | eui48 | — | indirect |
| crates.io | futures-executor | — | indirect |
| crates.io | geo-types | — | indirect |
| crates.io | jiff | — | indirect |
| crates.io | postgres | — | indirect |
| crates.io | serde_core | — | indirect |
| crates.io | serde_json | — | indirect |
| crates.io | smol_str | — | indirect |
| crates.io | socket2 | — | indirect |
| crates.io | time | — | indirect |
| crates.io | trybuild | — | indirect |
| crates.io | uuid | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 0
Installing crates:codegen@0.3.0 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.