Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 18:07 UTC

Mirix-AI / MIRIX

Mirix is a multi-agent personal assistant designed to track on-screen activities and answer user questions intelligently. By capturing real-time visual data and consolidating it into structured memories, Mirix transforms raw inputs into a rich knowledge base that adapts to your digital experiences.

PythonApache-2.0★ 3,559 stars⑂ 291 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverWeb interfacehow this is determined

Mirix-AI/MIRIX holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (84/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MIRIX-AIPersonal account
24 followers4 public repossince Jul 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPImirix0.1.7-7182 days agoaimemoryagentllmassistantclientapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume335 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year335
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year36
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases5 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 220 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~42.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv0.1.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release220
mean_days_between_releases42.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.6/60Stars3,559 stars
20.5/25Forks291 forks
5.8/15Watchers12 watchers
Inputs used
forks291
stars3,559
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 39% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.387
How it's scored
22.5/42Issue resolution54% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance40/54 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs40
open_issues32
closed_issues37
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.536
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.1/25Owner reach24 followers of Mirix-AI
9.3/25Track record4 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers24
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginMirix-AI
public_repos4
account_age_days763
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 182 days ago
20/20Version history7 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmirix
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish182

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://mirix.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsllm-agents, llm-memory, memory-agents, personal-assistant
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mirix.io/
docs_sitehttps://mirix.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities225 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:mirix@0.1.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 18 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history75 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.75
agent_instruction_files.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,158
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingdashboard/tsconfig.json, pyrightconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, poetry.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsdashboard/tsconfig.json, pyrightconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (dashboard/tsconfig.json, pyrightconfig.json)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes10/307 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes203,678
source_files_sampled307
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)mirix/queue/message.proto
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesmirix/queue/message.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3,559GitHub stars
9contributors
335commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
5releases
2bus factor
32open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 291 ⇿
0Stars
291Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030028892025-062026-012026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 4
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 18:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities225 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 72
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.0.5dashboard/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover^1.0.7dashboard/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.0.2dashboard/package.json
npmaxios^1.6.7dashboard/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.0dashboard/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.0dashboard/package.json
npmframer-motion^11.0.3dashboard/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.330.0dashboard/package.json
npmreact^18.2.0dashboard/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.2.0dashboard/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^6.22.0dashboard/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.2.1dashboard/package.json
PyPIpytzpyproject.toml
PyPInumpypyproject.toml
PyPIpandaspyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxlpyproject.toml
PyPIMarkdownpyproject.toml
PyPIPillow>=10.2.0,<11.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-imagepyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.108.1,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItiktokenpyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-genaipyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenvpyproject.toml
PyPIdemjson3pyproject.toml
PyPIpathvalidatepyproject.toml
PyPIdocstring_parserpyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemypyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpgpyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlitepyproject.toml
PyPIhttpxpyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settingspyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2pyproject.toml
PyPIhumpspyproject.toml
PyPIcomposiopyproject.toml
PyPIcoloramapyproject.toml
PyPIanthropicpyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx_ssepyproject.toml
PyPIrapidfuzzpyproject.toml
PyPIrank-bm25pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutilpyproject.toml
PyPIllama_indexpyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-embeddings-google-genaipyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.104.1pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.31.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpydubpyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipartpyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-apipyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdkpyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlppyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-requestspyproject.toml
PyPISpeechRecognitionpyproject.toml
PyPIpg8000pyproject.toml
PyPIpgvectorpyproject.toml
PyPIjson_repairpyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7.1,<14.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg2-binarypyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcppyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-authpyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-auth-oauthlibpyproject.toml
PyPIaiogooglepyproject.toml
PyPIpytest(>=8.4.2,<9.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIruff(>=0.13.3,<0.14.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyright(>=1.1.406,<2.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIipdb(>=0.13.13,<0.14.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf(>=5.0.0,<6.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIredis(>=7.0.1,<8.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIbcrypt(>=4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT(>=2.10.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIlangfuse(>=3.11.0,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIaiokafka(>=0.13.0,<0.14.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncddgspyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:mirix@0.1.7 pulls in 18 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.