Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 17:49 UTC

NVIDIA / nccl

Optimized primitives for collective multi-GPU communication

C++ · Cuda · CCustom license★ 5,098 stars⑂ 1,416 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗

NVIDIA/nccl holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated today. 10 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NVIDIA CorporationOrganization · verified domain
30,157 followers804 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpacepoints to another repo — not scored1.0.1b147103814 days agodispersivehydrodynamicsdataqualitystraightness
PyPInccl4py0.5.0634,839616 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,062 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,062
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year43

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagnccl4py-v0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases20.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,098 stars
25/25Forks — 1,416 forks
12.3/15Watchers — 167 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,416
stars5,098
watchers167
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
77.4/80Monthly downloads — 634,839 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnccl4py
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads634,839
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
54/54Bus factor — 10 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
20/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 11% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor10
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.11
How it's scored
36/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
7.5/30PR acceptance — 80/318 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/15 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs80
open_issues274
closed_issues1,635
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d19
issue_closed_ratio0.856
closed_unmerged_prs238
first_time_authors_30d11
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d15
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 30,157 followers of NVIDIA
25/25Track record — 804 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers30,157
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginNVIDIA
public_repos804
account_age_days5,242

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 16 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnccl4py
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish16

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), contrib/nccl4rust/Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nccl/user-guide/docs/index.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscommunications, cpp, cuda, deep-learning, gpu, nvidia
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nccl/user-guide/docs/index.html
docs_sitehttps://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/nccl/user-guide/docs/index.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — no dependency manifests — not applicable
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesCargo.lock, uv.lock
manifests—
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages15
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.nvidia.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.nvidia.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, bindings/ir/Makefile, bindings/nccl4py/Makefile, contrib/custom_algos/allreduce/Makefile, contrib/custom_algos/alltoall/Makefile, contrib/nccl4rust/Makefile, contrib/nccl_checkpoint/Makefile, contrib/nccl_checkpoint/python/tests/Makefile, contrib/nccl_ep/Makefile, contrib/nccl_ep/tests/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/benchmarks/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/tests/Makefile, contrib/niin/Makefile, contrib/niin/perftest/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/01_multiple_devices_single_process/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/02_one_device_per_pthread/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/03_one_device_per_process_mpi/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/Makefile, docs/examples/02_point_to_point/01_ring_pattern/c/Makefile, docs/examples/02_point_to_point/Makefile, docs/examples/03_collectives/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/03_collectives/Makefile, docs/examples/04_user_buffer_registration/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/04_user_buffer_registration/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/02_allgather/c/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/01_allreduce_lsa/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/02_alltoall_gin/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/03_alltoall_hybrid/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/04_cft_barrier/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/01_rmsnorm_lsa/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/02_rmsnorm_multimem/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/03_rmsnorm_gin/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/04_rmsnorm_hybrid/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/Makefile, docs/examples/08_ras/01_fault_detection/c/Makefile, docs/examples/08_ras/Makefile, docs/examples/Makefile, docs/userguide/Makefile, pkg/Makefile, pkg/debian/Makefile, pkg/python_wheel/Makefile, pkg/redhat/Makefile, pkg/srctxz/Makefile, pkg/txz/Makefile, plugins/env/example/Makefile, plugins/gin/example/Makefile, plugins/mixed/example/Makefile, plugins/net/example/Makefile, plugins/net/google-fastsocket/Makefile, plugins/profiler/example/Makefile, plugins/profiler/google-CoMMA/Makefile, plugins/profiler/inspector/Makefile, plugins/rma/example/Makefile, plugins/tuner/basic/Makefile, plugins/tuner/example/Makefile, plugins/tuner/example/test/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/device/Makefile, src/diagnostics/device/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), contrib/nccl4rust/Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints])
11/11Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, bindings/ir/Makefile, bindings/nccl4py/Makefile, contrib/custom_algos/allreduce/Makefile, contrib/custom_algos/alltoall/Makefile, contrib/nccl4rust/Makefile, contrib/nccl_checkpoint/Makefile, contrib/nccl_checkpoint/python/tests/Makefile, contrib/nccl_ep/Makefile, contrib/nccl_ep/tests/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/benchmarks/Makefile, contrib/nccl_m2n/tests/Makefile, contrib/niin/Makefile, contrib/niin/perftest/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/01_multiple_devices_single_process/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/02_one_device_per_pthread/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/03_one_device_per_process_mpi/c/Makefile, docs/examples/01_communicators/Makefile, docs/examples/02_point_to_point/01_ring_pattern/c/Makefile, docs/examples/02_point_to_point/Makefile, docs/examples/03_collectives/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/03_collectives/Makefile, docs/examples/04_user_buffer_registration/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/04_user_buffer_registration/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/01_allreduce/c/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/02_allgather/c/Makefile, docs/examples/05_symmetric_memory/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/01_allreduce_lsa/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/02_alltoall_gin/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/03_alltoall_hybrid/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/04_cft_barrier/c/Makefile, docs/examples/06_device_api/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/01_rmsnorm_lsa/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/02_rmsnorm_multimem/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/03_rmsnorm_gin/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/04_rmsnorm_hybrid/c/Makefile, docs/examples/07_kernel_fusion/Makefile, docs/examples/08_ras/01_fault_detection/c/Makefile, docs/examples/08_ras/Makefile, docs/examples/Makefile, docs/userguide/Makefile, pkg/Makefile, pkg/debian/Makefile, pkg/python_wheel/Makefile, pkg/redhat/Makefile, pkg/srctxz/Makefile, pkg/txz/Makefile, plugins/env/example/Makefile, plugins/gin/example/Makefile, plugins/mixed/example/Makefile, plugins/net/example/Makefile, plugins/net/google-fastsocket/Makefile, plugins/profiler/example/Makefile, plugins/profiler/google-CoMMA/Makefile, plugins/profiler/inspector/Makefile, plugins/rma/example/Makefile, plugins/tuner/basic/Makefile, plugins/tuner/example/Makefile, plugins/tuner/example/test/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/device/Makefile, src/diagnostics/device/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscontrib/nccl4rust/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/crates/nccl-device-sys/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/crates/nccl-device/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/crates/nccl-sys/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/crates/nccl/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/tests/cuda-oxide-smoke/Cargo.toml, contrib/nccl4rust/tests/runtime-smoke/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 27/836 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes224,669
source_files_sampled836
oversized_source_files27
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,098GitHub stars
100contributors
1,062commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
10bus factor
274open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'pace_cpp' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'ubx._C' from its registry
  • pypi package 'pace' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Dispersive-Hydrodynamics-Lab/PACE); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • pypi download statistics for 'nccl4py' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'ubx' from its registry
  • pypi download figures for nccl4py carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (killed by SIGKILL — most likely the container's memory limit; 2026/09/17 17:48:11 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,416 ⇿
0Stars
1,416Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

05001,0001,5001,416142021-042023-122026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 5 days.

Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpackaging—bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml
PyPIcuda-core~=1.0bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml
PyPIcuda-pathfinder>=1.5.4,<2.0.0bindings/nccl4py/pyproject.toml
PyPItorch>=2.1contrib/nccl_ubx/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcuda-core1.1.1direct
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.6.0direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPInumpy2.5.1direct
PyPIpackaging26.3direct
PyPItorch—direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103indirect
crates.iobindgen0.71.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iocexpr0.6.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclang-sys1.8.1indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocuda-bindings0.1.0indirect
crates.iocuda-core0.1.0indirect
crates.iocuda-device0.1.0indirect
crates.iocuda-host0.1.0indirect
crates.iocuda-macros0.1.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibloading0.8.9indirect
crates.iolibnvvm-sys0.1.0indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.ionom7.1.3indirect
crates.ionvjitlink-sys0.1.0indirect
crates.ioobject0.36.7indirect
crates.iooxide-artifacts0.1.0indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioreserved-oxide-symbols0.1.0indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.2indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.52indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.52indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.13indirect
PyPIbackports-strenum1.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.3indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings12.9.7indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.2.0indirect
PyPIcuda-python12.9.7indirect
PyPIcuda-python13.2.0indirect
PyPIcupy-cuda12x—indirect
PyPIcupy-cuda13x—indirect
PyPIdocutils0.20.1indirect
PyPIduckdb—indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImatplotlib—indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImpi4py—indirect
PyPImpi4py4.1.2indirect
PyPInccl4py—indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvdisasm13.3.73indirect
PyPInvidia-cutlass-dsl4.7.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-base4.7.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-core4.7.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-cu124.7.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-cu134.7.0indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.30.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.30.7indirect
PyPIpandas—indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpyarrow—indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mpi—indirect
PyPIpytest-mpi0.6indirect
PyPIpytest-run-parallel0.10.0indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsphinx7.1.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-llm1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme2.0.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItqdm—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.