Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 02:27 UTC

NatLabRockies / REopt_API

The model for the REopt API, which is used as the back-end for the REopt Webtool (reopt.nrel.gov/tool), and can be accessed directly via the NREL Developer Network (https://developer.nlr.gov/docs/energy-optimization/reopt)

Python · PowerBuilderCustom license★ 125 stars⑂ 68 forkssince Dec 2018View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

#nrel #renewable-energy #optimization #reopt-lite-api #reopt-api #reoptjl

NatLabRockies/REopt_API holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

National Laboratory of the RockiesOrganization

1,492 followers809 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.1/36	Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 514 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	514
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	42

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 79 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	79
latest_release_tag	v3.23.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	24
mean_days_between_releases	28.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate

How it's scored

34/60	Stars — 125 stars
15.2/25	Forks — 68 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	68
stars	125
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

79Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	18
top_contributor_share	0.327

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate

How it's scored

20.5/42	Issue resolution — 49% of issues closed
24.4/30	PR acceptance — 517/636 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	517
open_issues	44
closed_issues	42
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.488
closed_unmerged_prs	119
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

78Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
22.8/25	Owner reach — 1,492 followers of NatLabRockies
25/25	Track record — 809 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1,492
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	NatLabRockies
public_repos	809
account_age_days	5,195

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

56Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
8/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://developer.nlr.gov/docs/energy-optimization/reopt
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	nrel, renewable-energy, optimization, reopt-lite-api, reopt-api, reoptjl
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://developer.nlr.gov/docs/energy-optimization/reopt
docs_site	https://developer.nlr.gov/docs/energy-optimization/reopt
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak

How it's scored

5.2/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1/2.5	CI-Tests — 2 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 153 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	259
affected_packages	32
assessed_packages	238
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 4, high 16, moderate 9, low 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 238 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

12Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.3/40	Legible commit history — 23 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.23
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.05
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54/55	Manageable file sizes — 12/635 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	354,673
source_files_sampled	635
oversized_source_files	12

Key facts

125GitHub stars

18contributors

514commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

79releases

2bus factor

44open issues

PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 68 ⇿

0Stars

68Forks

75Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 37Patch 35

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 02:26 UTC

7	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
4	CI-Tests	2 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	153 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	db-syncer	`—`	db-syncer/Gemfile
RubyGems	rails-sql-tasks-enhancer	`—`	db-syncer/Gemfile
RubyGems	vault_env_secrets	`~> 2.0.0`	db-syncer/Gemfile
RubyGems	rails	`~> 8.1.3`	db-syncer/Gemfile
RubyGems	pg	`~> 1.6.3`	db-syncer/Gemfile

All dependencies 238

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 235 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	pg	`1.6.3`	direct
RubyGems	rails	`8.1.3`	direct
RubyGems	vault_env_secrets	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	adal	`1.2.7`	indirect
PyPI	amqp	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	asgiref	`3.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	autopep8	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	azure-core	`1.35.0`	indirect
PyPI	backcall	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	bandit	`1.8.6`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	billiard	`4.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	bleach	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	blosc2	`3.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`5.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	celery	`5.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2025.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	click-didyoumean	`0.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	click-plugins	`1.1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	click-repl	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	cligj	`0.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coolprop	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`45.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	cython	`3.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	deepdish	`0.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	deprecated	`1.2.18`	indirect
PyPI	django	`4.2.26`	indirect
PyPI	django-celery-results	`2.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	django-extensions	`4.1`	indirect
PyPI	django-picklefield	`3.3`	indirect
PyPI	django-tastypie	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	docopt	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	et-xmlfile	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastjsonschema	`2.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	fiona	`1.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	future	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	geopandas	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.45`	indirect
PyPI	google-api-core	`2.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	google-api-python-client	`2.181.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth	`2.40.3`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth-httplib2	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth-oauthlib	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.70.0`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	gunicorn	`23.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	h5py	`3.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	h5pyd	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	httplib2	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.10`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.12.3`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-genutils	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	isodate	`0.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	jdcal	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-client	`8.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-core	`5.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab-pygments	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	kombu	`5.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mistune	`3.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	msgpack	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	msrest	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	msrestazure	`0.6.4.post1`	indirect
PyPI	munch	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	nbclient	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	nbconvert	`7.16.6`	indirect
PyPI	nbformat	`5.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	ndindex	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	numexpr	`2.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`1.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	numpy-financial	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	oauthlib	`3.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	openpyxl	`3.1.5`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`25.0`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pandocfilters	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.5`	indirect
PyPI	pathlib2	`2.3.7.post1`	indirect
PyPI	pbr	`7.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pickleshare	`0.7.5`	indirect
PyPI	pipreqs	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	proto-plus	`1.26.1`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`6.32.0`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg2	`2.9.10`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	py-cpuinfo	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycodestyle	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`2.23`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyogrio	`0.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyproj	`3.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-mimeparse	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytz-deprecation-shim	`0.1.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyzmq	`27.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`6.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	indirect
PyPI	requests-oauthlib	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests-unixsocket	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	rollbar	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.27.1`	indirect
PyPI	rsa	`4.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`80.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	shapely	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8`	indirect
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.43`	indirect
PyPI	sqlparse	`0.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	tables	`3.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	toml	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	uritemplate	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	vine	`5.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.2.13`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`1.17.3`	indirect
PyPI	xlrd	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	xlsxwriter	`3.2.5`	indirect
PyPI	yarg	`0.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.0`	indirect
RubyGems	action_text-trix	`2.1.19`	indirect
RubyGems	actioncable	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	actionmailbox	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	actionmailer	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	actionpack	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	actiontext	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	actionview	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activejob	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activemodel	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activerecord	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activestorage	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	activesupport	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	base64	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	builder	`3.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.6`	indirect
RubyGems	connection_pool	`3.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	crass	`1.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	date	`3.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	domain_name	`0.6.20240107`	indirect
RubyGems	drb	`2.2.3`	indirect
RubyGems	erb	`6.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	erubi	`1.13.1`	indirect
RubyGems	globalid	`1.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	highline	`3.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	http-accept	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	http-cookie	`1.1.6`	indirect
RubyGems	i18n	`1.14.8`	indirect
RubyGems	io-console	`0.8.2`	indirect
RubyGems	irb	`1.18.0`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.19.5`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	loofah	`2.25.1`	indirect
RubyGems	mail	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	marcel	`1.2.1`	indirect
RubyGems	mime-types	`3.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	mime-types-data	`3.2026.0414`	indirect
RubyGems	mini_mime	`1.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	mini_portile2	`2.8.9`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`6.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	net-imap	`0.6.4`	indirect
RubyGems	net-pop	`0.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	net-protocol	`0.2.2`	indirect
RubyGems	net-smtp	`0.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	netrc	`0.11.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nio4r	`2.7.5`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`1.19.3`	indirect
RubyGems	pp	`0.6.3`	indirect
RubyGems	prettyprint	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	psych	`5.3.1`	indirect
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rack	`3.2.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rack-session	`2.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rack-test	`2.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rackup	`2.3.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rails-dom-testing	`2.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rails-html-sanitizer	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	railties	`8.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rdoc	`7.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reline	`0.6.3`	indirect
RubyGems	rest-client	`2.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	securerandom	`0.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	stringio	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	thor	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	timeout	`0.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	tsort	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	tzinfo	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	uri	`1.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	useragent	`0.16.11`	indirect
RubyGems	websocket-driver	`0.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	websocket-extensions	`0.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`2.8.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 32

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 238 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 32 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
activestorage	`8.1.3`	indirect	critical	1	`8.1.3.1`
cryptography	`45.0.7`	indirect	critical	13	`50.0.0`
django	`4.2.26`	indirect	critical	37	`6.0.8`
gitpython	`3.1.45`	indirect	critical	56	`3.1.60`
azure-core	`1.35.0`	indirect	high	2	`1.38.0`
click	`8.2.1`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`
concurrent-ruby	`1.3.6`	indirect	high	3	`1.3.7`
geopandas	`1.1.1`	indirect	high	2	`1.1.2`
httplib2	`0.30.0`	indirect	high	2	`0.32.0`
lxml	`6.0.1`	indirect	high	2	`6.1.0`
mistune	`3.1.4`	indirect	high	30	`3.3.0`
msgpack	`1.1.1`	indirect	high	2	`1.2.1`
protobuf	`6.32.0`	indirect	high	2	`6.33.5`
pyasn1	`0.6.1`	indirect	high	10	`0.6.4`
pyjwt	`2.10.1`	indirect	high	13	`2.13.0`
soupsieve	`2.8`	indirect	high	6	`2.9.0`
sqlparse	`0.5.3`	indirect	high	11	`0.6.0`
tornado	`6.5.2`	indirect	high	21	`6.5.8`
urllib3	`2.5.0`	indirect	high	8	`2.7.0`
websocket-driver	`0.8.0`	indirect	high	4	`0.8.2`
bleach	`6.2.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`6.4.0`
idna	`3.10`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
loofah	`2.25.1`	indirect	moderate	3	`2.25.2`
mail	`2.9.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.9.1`
nbconvert	`7.16.6`	indirect	moderate	6	`7.17.1`
net-imap	`0.6.4`	indirect	moderate	3	`0.6.4.1`
nokogiri	`1.19.3`	indirect	moderate	8	`1.19.4`
requests	`2.32.5`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.33.0`
setuptools	`80.9.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`
json	`2.19.5`	indirect	low	1	`2.19.9`
pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect	low	2	`2.20.0`
rails-html-sanitizer	`1.7.0`	indirect	low	1	`1.7.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records