Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 01:04 UTC

NewLifeX / X

Core basic components: log (file / network), configuration (XML / JSON / HTTP), cache (memory / redis), network (TCP / UDP / HTTP), RPC framework, serialization (binary / XML / JSON), APM performance tracking. 核心基础组件,日志(文件/网络)、配置(XML/Json/Http)、缓存(内存/Redis)、网络(Tcp/Udp/Http)、RPC框架、序列化(Binary/XML/Json)、APM性能追踪。

C#MIT★ 1,861 stars⑂ 549 forkssince Jun 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

NewLifeX/X holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (81/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

新生命开发团队Organization · verified domain
529 followers96 public repossince Jun 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetNewLife.Core11.18.2026.801-14521 days agonewlifenewlife.core
NuGetNewLife.Security11.18.2026.801-7321 days agonewlifenewlife.security

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume433 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year433
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year43
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 705 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~1,287.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagBench2024_MemoryCache
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release705
mean_days_between_releases1,287.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53/60Stars1,861 stars
22.8/25Forks549 forks
12.3/15Watchers161 watchers
Inputs used
forks549
stars1,861
watchers161
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65.3/80Total downloads1,909,539 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNewLife.Core, NewLife.Security
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,909,539
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 92% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth79 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled79
top_contributor_share0.915
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance59/64 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues0
closed_issues110
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
19.6/25Owner reach529 followers of NewLifeX
25/25Track record96 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers529
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginNewLifeX
public_repos96
account_age_days3,720

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 21 days ago
20/20Version history145 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNewLife.Core, NewLife.Security
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://newlifex.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnetwork, security, thread, reflection, service, server, serialize, rpc, api, newlife
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://newlifex.com
docs_sitehttps://newlifex.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages29
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 29 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/instructions/xcode.instructions.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.77
agent_instruction_files.github/instructions/xcode.instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes24,587
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapApp1/App1.Android/App1.Android.csproj, App1/App1/App1.csproj, Benchmark/Benchmark.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsApp1/App1.Android/App1.Android.csproj, App1/App1/App1.csproj, Benchmark/Benchmark.csproj, NewLife.Android/NewLife.Android.csproj, NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj, NewLife.Security/NewLife.Security.csproj, Samples/MobileApp/MobileApp.Android/MobileApp.Android.csproj, Samples/MobileApp/MobileApp.iOS/MobileApp.iOS.csproj, Samples/MobileApp/MobileApp/MobileApp.csproj, Samples/Zero.Desktop/Zero.Desktop.csproj, Samples/Zero.EchoServer/Zero.EchoServer.csproj, Samples/Zero.HttpServer/Zero.HttpServer.csproj, Samples/Zero.Server/Zero.Server.csproj, Test/Test.csproj, Test2/Test2.csproj, XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes5/607 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes2,323,500
source_files_sampled607
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,861GitHub stars
79contributors
433commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 549 ⇿
0Stars
549Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500600545302016-062021-072026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 01:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Management9.0.5NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4NewLife.Core/NewLife.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301NewLife.Security/NewLife.Security.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Cng5.0.0NewLife.Security/NewLife.Security.csproj
NuGetNewLife.Stardust3.9.2026.708Test2/Test2.csproj
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.6.2XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives10.0.10XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetNewLife.Modbus2.0.2026.610XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetNewLife.Remoting3.8.2026.706XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetNewLife.UnitTest1.1.2026.102XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Management9.0.5XUnitTest.Core/XUnitTest.Core.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Forms5.0.0.2401App1/App1.Android/App1.Android.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Essentials1.7.2App1/App1.Android/App1.Android.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Forms5.0.0.2401App1/App1/App1.csproj
NuGetXamarin.Essentials1.7.2App1/App1/App1.csproj
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.6.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetNewLife.Modbus2.0.2026.610direct
NuGetNewLife.Remoting3.8.2026.706direct
NuGetNewLife.Stardust2.0.2022.425direct
NuGetNewLife.Stardust3.9.2026.708direct
NuGetNewLife.UnitTest1.1.2026.102direct
NuGetSystem.Management9.0.5direct
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5direct
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Cng5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4direct
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.2direct
NuGetXamarin.Essentials1.7.2direct
NuGetXamarin.Forms5.0.0.2401direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetNewLife.Redis6.5.2026.701indirect
NuGetNewLife.XCode12.0.2026.701indirect
NuGetSystem.Speech10.0.10indirect
NuGetXamarin.Android.Support.Core.Utils28.0.0.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 29 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.