Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-26 22:57 UTC

OSS-Docs-Tools / code-owner-self-merge

A GitHub Action for letting CODEOWNERS merge PRs via green PR reviews

JavaScriptMIT★ 62 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Sep 2019View on GitHub ↗
#github-actions#actions#javascript

OSS-Docs-Tools/code-owner-self-merge holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (62/100) and lowest on Vitality (30/100). It was last updated 102 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OSS Docs ToolsOrganization
1 follower5 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmchalkpoints to another repo — not scored6.0.01,844,770,272440 days agocolorcolourcolorsterminalconsoleclistringansistylestylesttyformattingrgb256shellxtermlogloggingcommand-linetext
npmdebugpoints to another repo — not scored4.4.32,732,434,27777316 days agodebuglogdebugger
npmcommanderpoints to another repo — not scored15.0.01,814,382,33112458 days agocommandercommandoptionparsercliargumentargsargv
npmansi-regexpoints to another repo — not scored6.2.22,099,009,58220321 days agoansistylescolorcolourcolorsterminalconsoleclistringttyescapeformattingrgb256shellxtermcommand-linetextregexregexprematchtestfindpattern
npmcodeownerspoints to another repo — not scored5.1.12,364,950141865 days agocodeownersgithubgitlab
npmcolor-namepoints to another repo — not scored2.1.11,345,669,728134 days agocolor-namecolorcolor-keywordkeyword
npmconcat-mappoints to another repo — not scored0.0.2572,336,08531383 days agoconcatconcatmapmapfunctionalhigher-order
npmansi-stylespoints to another repo — not scored7.0.02,757,337,564290 days agoansistylescolorcolourcolorsterminalconsoleclistringttyescapeformattingrgb256shellxtermlogloggingcommand-linetext

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

15Critical
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 102 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push102
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 21 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 490 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~151.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tag1.6.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release490
mean_days_between_releases151.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak
How it's scored
29/60Stars — 62 stars
10.3/25Forks — 18 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars62
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 76% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 44 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.764

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance — 26/30 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs26
open_issues11
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of OSS-Docs-Tools
16.8/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginOSS-Docs-Tools
public_repos5
account_age_days2,042

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

70Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgithub-actions, actions, javascript
has_wikino
homepage—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 44 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

54Moderate
How it's scored
10.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: @octokit/webhooks 7.9.3 (high 8.2), @actions/core 1.2.4 (moderate 5.0)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
30.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,124 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories31
affected_packages19
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 9, moderate 6, low 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40Legible commit history — 28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.28
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.json
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/2 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes15,050
source_files_sampled2
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—

Key facts

62GitHub stars
5contributors
2commits, last 12 months
102days since last push
21releases
1bus factor
11open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'code-owner-self-merge' from its registry
  • npm package 'chalk' points at a different repository (https://github.com/chalk/chalk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'debug' points at a different repository (https://github.com/debug-js/debug); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'commander' points at a different repository (https://github.com/tj/commander.js); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'ansi-regex' points at a different repository (https://github.com/chalk/ansi-regex); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'codeowners' points at a different repository (https://github.com/beaugunderson/codeowners); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'color-name' points at a different repository (https://github.com/colorjs/color-name); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'concat-map' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ljharb/concat-map); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'ansi-styles' points at a different repository (https://github.com/chalk/ansi-styles); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • deps.dev does not index npm:chalk@6.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04812161612020-032023-022026-02
Major 0Minor 4Patch 14

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-26 22:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests1 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 44 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@actions/core^1.2.4package.json
npm@actions/github^4.0.0package.json
npm@octokit/webhooks^7.9.3package.json
npm@types/jest^26.0.9package.json
npmcodeowners^4.2.0package.json
npmclean-stack^2.0.0node_modules/aggregate-error/package.json
npmindent-string^4.0.0node_modules/aggregate-error/package.json
npm@types/color-name^1.1.1node_modules/ansi-styles/package.json
npmcolor-convert^2.0.1node_modules/ansi-styles/package.json
npmbalanced-match^1.0.0node_modules/brace-expansion/package.json
npmconcat-map0.0.1node_modules/brace-expansion/package.json
npmansi-styles^3.2.1node_modules/chalk/package.json
npmescape-string-regexp^1.0.5node_modules/chalk/package.json
npmsupports-color^5.3.0node_modules/chalk/package.json
npmcommander^6.0.0node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmfind-up^2.1.0node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmignore^3.3.3node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmis-directory^0.3.1node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmlodash.intersection^4.4.0node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmlodash.maxby^4.6.0node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmlodash.padend^4.6.1node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmtrue-case-path^1.0.2node_modules/codeowners/package.json
npmcolor-name~1.1.4node_modules/color-convert/package.json
npmsafe-buffer~5.1.1node_modules/convert-source-map/package.json
npmpath-key^3.1.0node_modules/cross-spawn/package.json
npmshebang-command^2.0.0node_modules/cross-spawn/package.json
npmwhich^2.0.1node_modules/cross-spawn/package.json
npmms^2.1.1node_modules/debug/package.json
npmonce^1.4.0node_modules/end-of-stream/package.json
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 109 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@actions/core1.2.4direct
npm@actions/github4.0.0direct
npm@octokit/webhooks7.9.3direct
npm@types/color-name1.1.1direct
npm@types/jest26.0.9direct
npmansi-styles3.2.1direct
npmansi-styles4.2.1direct
npmbalanced-match1.0.0direct
npmclean-stack2.2.0direct
npmcodeowners4.2.0direct
npmcolor-convert1.9.3direct
npmcolor-convert2.0.1direct
npmcolor-name1.1.3direct
npmcolor-name1.1.4direct
npmcommander6.0.0direct
npmconcat-map0.0.1direct
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5direct
npmfind-up2.1.0direct
npmignore3.3.10direct
npmindent-string4.0.0direct
npmis-directory0.3.1direct
npmlodash.intersection4.4.0direct
npmlodash.maxby4.6.0direct
npmlodash.padend4.6.1direct
npmms2.1.2direct
npmonce1.4.0direct
npmpath-key3.1.1direct
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2direct
npmshebang-command2.0.0direct
npmsupports-color5.5.0direct
npmsupports-color7.1.0direct
npmtrue-case-path1.0.3direct
npmwhich2.0.2direct
npm@actions/http-client1.0.8indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/core7.11.1indirect
npm@babel/generator7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-create-class-features-plugin7.10.5indirect
npm@babel/helper-function-name7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-get-function-arity7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-member-expression-to-functions7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-optimise-call-expression7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-plugin-utils7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-replace-supers7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-simple-access7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-split-export-declaration7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/highlight7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/parser7.11.3indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import7.8.3indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-import-meta7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-typescript7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/plugin-transform-typescript7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/preset-typescript7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/template7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.11.0indirect
npm@babel/types7.11.0indirect
npm@jest/types25.5.0indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token2.4.2indirect
npm@octokit/core3.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint6.0.5indirect
npm@octokit/graphql4.5.3indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest2.3.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods4.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/request5.4.7indirect
npm@octokit/request-error2.0.2indirect
npm@octokit/types5.4.0indirect
npm@pika/babel-plugin-esm-import-rewrite0.6.1indirect
npm@pika/plugin-ts-standard-pkg0.9.2indirect
npm@pika/types0.9.2indirect
npm@types/istanbul-lib-coverage2.0.3indirect
npm@types/istanbul-lib-report3.0.0indirect
npm@types/istanbul-reports1.1.2indirect
npm@types/minimist1.2.0indirect
npm@types/node14.0.27indirect
npm@types/yargs15.0.5indirect
npm@types/yargs-parser15.0.0indirect
npmaggregate-error3.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.0indirect
npmbefore-after-hook2.1.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmchalk3.0.0indirect
npmconvert-source-map1.7.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdebug4.1.1indirect
npmdeprecation2.3.1indirect
npmdiff-sequences25.2.6indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmexeca2.1.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.1indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmglob7.1.4indirect
npmglob7.1.6indirect
npmglobals11.12.0indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-plain-object4.1.1indirect
npmis-stream2.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjest-diff25.5.0indirect
npmjest-get-type25.2.6indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsesc2.5.2indirect
npmjson52.1.3indirect
npmlocate-path2.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.19indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmminimist1.2.5indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.5indirect
npmnode-fetch2.6.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path3.1.0indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmp-finally2.0.1indirect
npmp-limit1.3.0indirect
npmp-locate2.0.0indirect
npmp-try1.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists3.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.6indirect
npmpretty-format25.5.0indirect
npmpump3.0.0indirect
npmreact-is16.13.1indirect
npmresolve1.17.0indirect
npmsemver5.7.1indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.3indirect
npmsource-map0.5.7indirect
npmstandard-pkg0.5.0indirect
npmstrip-final-newline2.0.0indirect
npmto-fast-properties2.0.0indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent6.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@babel/traverse7.11.0indirectcritical18.0.0-alpha.4
minimist1.2.5indirectcritical11.2.6
@octokit/webhooks7.9.3directhigh114.0.2
ansi-regex5.0.0indirecthigh16.0.1
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh45.0.8
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
json52.1.3indirecthigh12.2.2
lodash4.17.19indirecthigh54.18.0
minimatch3.0.4indirecthigh410.2.3
node-fetch2.6.0indirecthigh23.1.1
semver5.7.1indirecthigh17.5.2
@actions/core1.2.4directmoderate21.9.1
@babel/helpers7.10.4indirectmoderate18.0.0-alpha.17
@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest2.3.0indirectmoderate111.4.1
@octokit/request5.4.7indirectmoderate19.2.1
@octokit/request-error2.0.2indirectmoderate16.1.7
path-parse1.0.6indirectmoderate11.0.7
@babel/core7.11.1indirectlow18.0.0-rc.6
debug4.1.1indirectlow14.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with OSS-Docs-Tools/code-owner-self-merge. Read them side by side →

95github/gh-awGitHub Agentic WorkflowsExceptional94githubnext/gh-awGitHub Agentic WorkflowsExceptional99RocketChat/Rocket.ChatThe Secure CommsOS™ for mission-critical operationsExceptional99carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional99eslint/eslintFind and fix problems in your JavaScript code.Exceptional99processing/p5.jsp5.js is a client-side JS platform that empowers artists, designers, students, and anyone to learn to code and express themselves creatively on the web. It is based on the core principles of Processing. Looking for p5.js 2.0? http://beta.p5js.orgExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.